The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

164 protocols using jmp pro 10

1

Genotypic Relatedness Analysis in Blueberries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotypic relatedness based on pedigree and biochemical profiles were compared using hierarchical cluster analyses. Two-way ward cluster analysis of genotypic relatedness based on pedigree information was performed in R (R, Vienna, Austria). Two-way ward cluster analysis of genotypic relatedness based on biochemical profiles was constructed in JMP® Pro 10 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Pair-wise correlations and significance between sensory measurements and primary biochemical components were calculated, with panelist as a random effect. Least Square Means (LSMeans) of the sensory data for each sample were obtained to account of the random effect of panelist. A partial least squares (PLS) analysis was constructed in JMP® Pro 10 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to reveal effectors of sensory ratings [33 –37 ]. The response variables (Y) considered corresponded to LSMeans of overall liking, sweetness, sourness, and blueberry flavor intensity. Glucose, fructose, sucrose, TA, pH, and 52 volatile compounds (S2 Table) were considered as explanatory variables (X). The inclusion of texture liking was evaluated independently given that no explanatory physical measure was made for sample texture. Variables were centered and scaled (hence, correlation matrices were used), and a 20-fold cross-validation method was used. The model was created without texture for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multivariate Analysis of Ocular Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics for data were reported as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. A multivariate data analysis was performed to classify the subjects on the pre-existing different groups based on ocular variables collected using Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). The QDA classifier produced a group of five discriminative functions and each subject was classified according to the cut-off point. The assumptions required to apply QDA were tested as described by Hair [39 ]. In order to detect potential problems with multicollinearity, the pooled within-group correlation was tested between all variables. As recommended, all the correlation coefficient were lower than 0.8 [39 ].
Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was built to determine the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC was used to evaluate the classification performance of individuals in different diseases [40 (link)]. All analyses were performed using JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Associations Between Social Problems and Self-Rated Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographic characteristics including sex, age, and race/ethnicity were obtained. The distributions of social problems were analyzed according to social problem domain and summarized according to sex. Continuous variables were compared using t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA), and dichotomous variables were compared using chi-square tests. To determine the correlation between social problems, which were captured as present =1, absent =0, phi coefficient was estimated. Mean self-rated health was calculated according to sex, race/ethnicity, and social problem domain. Unadjusted univariable regression models assessed the independent relationship of the social problems with self-rated health. Social problems often do not occur in isolation, therefore we also constructed multivariable regression models (adjusted for sex, age, race/ethnicity) to assess the association between all the social problems with self-rated health. All tests employed two-tailed significance testing. All analyses were performed using JMP® Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and IBM SPSS 20.0® (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Logistic Regression for Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Univariate logistic regression analysis and descriptive statistics were calculated using JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biological Age Determination in OA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Age associations were determined by linear regression analysis (Prism5, GraphPad Software Inc). Asp-RR was compared across joint sites by multivariable regression (JMP Pro 10.0, SAS Institute Inc) with age, gender and joint location as independent variables. The biological age for an OA specimen was determined by interpolation from an age by Asp-RR linear regression analysis of non-OA cartilage. The relative age was determined by subtracting the biological age of the sample from the known chronological age of the sample with significance by joint site determined by Mann Whitney test (Prism5). The method of calculating half-lives of collagen for OA knee and hip cartilage is described in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fibrosis Markers and HCC Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was conducted using JMP pro 10.0 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Kruskal-Wallis tests and Wilcoxon tests were used to assess whether there were any significant differences in the clinical or serological characteristics between groups. The diagnostic performances were assessed by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The probabilities of a true positive (sensitivity) and a true negative (specificity) assessment were determined for the selected cutoff values and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for each index. The Youden index was used to identify the optimal cutoff points. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the parameters that significantly contribute to the estimation of hepatic fibrosis. The diagnostic effectiveness of combinations of fibrosis markers were assessed using the logistic regression analysis and likelihood ratio test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the cumulative incidence of HCC, and the groups were compared using the log-rank test. The differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Consequences of Polyploidization in Mimulus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To address whether polyploidization in Mimulus neoallotetraploids has immediate and direct phenotypic consequences, we calculated the mean value of all floral traits. Principal components analyses were first conducted using all phenotypic traits to visualize the distribution of F1 and F2 classes relative to parental and M. sookensis phenotypes. Principal component 1 (PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2) were subsequently included in all mean and variance calculations. To test if ploidy has a significant effect on phenotype, Tukey-Kramer HSD tests were performed among all classes (e.g., IM-2x, IM-4x, F1-2x, F1-4x). We verified that comparison of means and variances by class (e.g., F1-2x) was appropriate by testing for significant differences in the means within each reciprocal cross (e.g., F1G-2x, F1N-2x) using a t-test. To test for normality, a Shapiro-Wilkes W test was conducted on each class for each trait. All statistical analyses of means and distributions were performed in JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Statistical Analysis Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Survival curves (Kaplan–Meier plots) were compared using the log-rank test. Pathological grades were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparisons of the numbers or contents of other results were carried out using the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. P values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using the Student two-tailed t test and ANOVA with repeated measures (general linear model, SPSS). Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD unless specified otherwise. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC), JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute, Inc.), or SPSS software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Priority Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington) was used to calculate priority scores (see EPM above). JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS, Cary, North Carolina) was used to calculate median, interquartile ranges and generate figures and tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!