The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using nanowizard 2 afm

1

AFM Characterization of VSMC Mechanics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) characterization of the cells, a Nanowizard II AFM (JPK Instruments AG, Berlin, Germany), as described previously, was used. For a control group, VSMC were cultured in serum-free DMEM for 24 h. We divided the experimental group into three subgroups, RASMC treated with M2 Macrophage supernatant, RASMC co-cultured with M2 macrophages in a Transwell (membrane pore =0.4 µm) plate and RASMC treated with M2Es for 24 h, respectively. Imaging of the washed VSMC was done in contact mode in air and under PBS with silicon and V-shaped silicon nitride probes (SICON-Applied Nanostructures and PNP-TR-Nanoword). The resultant spring constant was evaluated as 0.01 N m-1. Force spectroscopy on the living cells was conducted with V-shaped soft silicon nitride probes (MLCT. Bruker). The force curves were analyzed by Atomic J to calculate the sample Young's modulus using the Hertz model 17 (link). AFM image processing of the samples was done using the JPK data processing software (v.4.4.29). Each group analyzed at least ten cells, and for each cell at least twenty points were measured. The stiffness of each cell was calculated from the average stiffness of all of the effective points on each cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Simultaneous AFM and Microscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a Nanowizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) mounted on a Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). This configuration allows to carry out AFM measurements and simultaneously observe the cells using phase contrast or fluorescence modes. This AFM is also equipped with the 'CellHesion' module (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany). This module enables a long-range vertical displacement of the stage up to 100 µm which makes force spectroscopy measurements possible including cell-cell interactions. In parallel, a vertical piezotranslator (PIFOC, Physik Instrumente, Karlsruhe, Germany) is mounted on the microscope objective to move the objective concurrently with the microscope stage and focus on cells while carrying out AFM measurements. All the measurements were carried out at 37°C using the Petri Dish Heater (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing Cable Bacteria Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The outer surface of cable bacteria was investigated by a combination of FISH and atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging. Single filaments were picked with a sterile glass hook under microscopic guidance (Pfeffer et al., 2012 (link)), cleaned in MilliQ water and transferred to gelatine-coated cover slides. Samples were dehydrated, and FISH was performed as described above with probe DSB706. Optical and AFM imaging were performed on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M fluorescence microscope combined with a Nanowizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany). The coverslip was placed on the inverted microscope, and fluorescence images were obtained on the dry cells without any anti-bleaching agent using Zeiss filterset 43 to detect the CY3-labeled FISH probe. AFM images were then obtained from the same cells in ambient conditions using Olympus OMCL-AC160TS silicon cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 26 N m−1 in intermittent contact mode at a target frequency of 332 Hz, target amplitude of 1.5 V, set-point value of 0.95 V and a scan rate of 1 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Biomechanics Characterization by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCFS measurements were performed using a NanoWizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) mounted on top of an Axiovert 200 inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). For the cell mechanical properties measurements, standard pyramidal tipped cantilevers OMCLTR 400PSA HW (Olympus) had a nominal spring constant of 0.02 N/m. The cantilevers were calibrated by the thermal noise method before each experiment [30 (link)]. Cells were cultured on glass coverslips (ϕ 24 mm) for 24 h before the experiment. All experiments were performed at 37 °C using a temperature-controlled BioCell chamber JPK Instruments (Berlin, Germany). Force-distance curves were collected with a force load of 0.4 nN and at a rate of 2.5 μm/s. Measurements were always performed over the nuclear region of the cells. Five curves were acquired for every cell, and in every experiment, a minimum of 30 cells was analyzed. Force-distance curves were analyzed with JPK data processing software. Cell mechanical properties were acquired by evaluating Young’s modulus (E) of the cell, applying the Hertz-Sneddon model [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adhesion Force Analysis via AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acquisition of adhesion data was performed using a NanoWizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, UK) employing a CellHesion module (JPK Instruments, UK), operating in force spectroscopy mode at 18°C. The sample and cantilever were immersed in acidic and alkaline aqueous solutions, contained within a clean glass Petri dish. The solutions were manufactured using dH2O and pH adjusted with NaOH 0.01 M or HCl 0.01 M, to achieve solutions of pH 3, 5, 7 and 9. The samples were immobilised using a double-sided Shintron adhesive tape (Agar Scientific, UK).
The vertical deflection and z-axis displacement data were recorded at a frequency of 10 kHz. A grid of 100 force-displacement curves was acquired for each sample/liquid combination, equally spaced over an area of 100 μm × 100 μm. The force-displacement data were analysed using JPK Data Processing software (JPK Instruments, UK).
A schematic of the measured forces is shown in Fig. 1. The out-of-contact repulsion force (Frep) was measured in the first peak from right to left of the approaching curve, the height of the triangle that was formed in the peak from the origin to the highest part of the peak until the signal was stable in the approach curve was measured as the force. The jump to force (FJT) was measured in the minimum point of the approach curve, and the pull-off force (FPO) was measured in the minimum point of the retract curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Graphene Oxide and Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size, zeta potential, and size distributions of GO and its related compounds
were analyzed by photon correlation spectroscopy using a Zetasizer instrument (ZEN3600,
Nanoseries, Malvern, UK). Shape and surface morphology was analyzed using atomic force
microscopy (AFM). For AFM analysis, 20 µl of the sample was placed on mica slide,
air-dried, and visualized under the Nanowizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Germany)
microscope. The images were acquired in contact mode under ambient conditions. The
chemical composition and the surface functional groups were analyzed by Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo-Nicolet spectrometer) with KBr pellets in the range of
400–4000 cm−1. UV-Vis spectrometer (Hitachi Inc., U-2910) was used to measure
the optical absorption properties of GO and related products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mapping Hydrogel Mechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Young’s moduli of the patterned hydrogels were measured on a NanoWizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) in the force mapping mode with MLCT C tip cantilevers (Bruker, Palaiseau, France) with a nominal spring constant of 0.01 N/m. Young’s moduli were fitted from the indentation curves using a Hertz–Sneddon model [36 ]. Rigidity maps were sampled every 0.3 to 1 µm, depending on the size of the pattern.
The sizes of the rigid dots were determined via comparison to the AFM data. A new image was generated, composed of the sliding average of the AFM data on squares of 3 pixel sides. The limits of the stiff dot were set at places where the gradient of the sliding average was larger than 500 Pa/µm. This region was then filled with the largest disk. The center and the radius of this disk defined the geometric parameters of the stiff dots. The mean of the rigidity was calculated on this area. The average on the 3 to 5 dots was performed and taken as the rigidity of the stiff dots. The limit of the soft region was defined using the same methodology. The largest disk that fills the region limited by the edges of the soft background shares the same center as the disk that fits the stiff dot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force Microscopy of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy images were collected using a JPK NanoWizard II AFM (JPK, Cambridge, UK) mounted on a Zeiss AxioObserver, in contact mode. Silicon nitride cantilevers (Veeco, Cambridge, UK) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

AFM Visualization of Graphene Oxide Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM has been used to observe at high resolution the effects of GO on bacteria morphology without altering the samples by complex dehydration and metallization. For AFM measurements, samples were prepared as explained elsewhere [36 (link)]. Briefly, 20 μL of GO were deposited on sterile cover glass slides, air-dried and washed once with ultrapure water (37 °C) to remove salt deposits interfering with the measurements. After sample preparation, measurements were immediately performed with a NanoWizard II AFM (JPK Instruments AG, Berlin, Germany). The images were acquired using silicon cantilevers with high aspect-ratio conical silicon tips (CSC37 Mikro-Masch, Tallinn, Estonia) characterized by an end radius of about 10 nm and a half conical angle of 20°. Cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 0.4 n/m were accurately calibrated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Atomic Force Microscopy of Fibril Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples containing fibrils were diluted to give a fibril concentration of 2 μM (monomer equivalent) in 20 mM phosphate buffer at the same pH as that of the sample. Diluted samples (30–50 μl) were deposited on cleaved mica (G 250-1, Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK), which was fixed onto glass microscope slides (Thermo Scientific, Paisley, UK) and left to dry. Once dry, the slides were washed twice using 100–200 μl of double-distilled water (Elga, High Wycombe, UK) and allowed to dry before storage at room temperature (RT).
AFM images were acquired using a NanoWizard II AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin, Germany) equipped with HQ:NSC36/No Al 65–130 kHz 0.6–2 N m–1 chips from μmasch (Innovative Solutions Bulgaria Ltd., Sofia, Bulgaria) in intermittent-contact mode in air and processed using Gwyddion (; https://www.gwyddion.net)51 and ImageJ.52 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!