The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsr fortessa 2

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland

The BD LSR Fortessa II is a flow cytometry analyzer designed for high-performance cell analysis. It features a compact design and offers multiple excitation laser options to accommodate a wide range of fluorescent dyes and applications. The core function of the LSR Fortessa II is to provide researchers with a versatile and reliable platform for multiparameter flow cytometry analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

120 protocols using lsr fortessa 2

1

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the detection of 4T1-GFP and E0771-GFP cells, single cells from the lungs were stained with Fixable Viability Dye, eFluor 780 (Thermofisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions, resuspended in 400 μL FC buffer (1% FBS/PBS) and measured by LSR Fortessa II (BD) using appropriate controls. Absolute numbers of cells were determined using CountBright beads (Thermofisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For the intracellular detection of IL-22 production, single cells from the lungs of control and tumor-injected mice were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in complete RPMI containing 50 ng/mL PMA, 1 μg/mL Ionomycin, 1 μL/mL of GolgiPlug (BD), 0.7 μL/mL GolgiStop (BD), 1 μL/mL 2-Mercaptoethanol.125 (link) After incubation, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with TruStain FcX (Biolegend) in FC buffer for 15 min at 4°C followed by washing with FC buffer and staining with antibodies for extracellular antigens and viability dye for 20 min at 4°C according to the Key resources table. Then, cells were washed with FC buffer, fixed and permeabilized by Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD) following manufacturer’s instructions and incubated with intracellular antibody in Wash buffer (BD) for 30 min at 4°C, washed by Wash (BD) buffer, resuspended in 400 μL FC buffer and analyzed by LSRFortessa II (BD). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Flowjo LLC, BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FITC-GAG Labeling and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded on PEI and PEMs with the terminal two single layers of FITC-labelled GAG and cultured for 48 h as described in the aforementioned section of CLSM. The cells were scraped after trypsinization, centrifuged, washed once with PBS and resuspended in 200 µL PBS. Then, a flow cytometry device (LSR Fortessa II, BD Bioscience, Germany) was used to measure the 100 µL cell suspension, which was transferred to 96-well plate. FACS-Diva software (LSR Fortessa II, BD Bioscience, Germany) (version 6.2) was used for data analysis [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell suspensions were stained with the antibodies indicated (Table S3) in Brilliant stain buffer (BD Biosciences) containing 4% normal mouse serum according to standard techniques. The cells were stained with 7-AAD and analyzed on an LSR Fortessa 2 (BD Biosciences) using Flowjo software (Treestar).
For the Legendscreen assay (Biolegend), each antibody was first resuspended in 35 µl of FACS buffer (PBS with 5% FCS and 0.05% sodium azide). Up to 300x10 6 cells were stained with the antibody backbone panel (Table S4), washed and resuspended in PBS with 5% FCS. 40 µl of cell suspension was aliquoted into each well of V-bottom 96-well plates containing 10 ul of the PEconjugated antibody per well. The cells were analysed using an LSR Fortessa 2 with High Throughput Sampler (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Cell Staining and Sorting for Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To stain the yeast cells for flow cytometric analysis, 0.1 OD of cells were stained with 100 μL of 67 nM M2B10 or M1H5 and 1H6 in HBSC-1% BSA, followed by detection with 1:200 dilution of the secondary antibodies (Alexa647 anti-human Fc and Alexa488 anti-mouse Fc). To determine whether the antibody binding was dependent on the RTX conformation, yeast cells were either stained in the absence of CaCl2 or heated at 85°C on a thermal cycler for 30 min before staining. Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a LSR Fortessa II (BD). All flow data were analyzed with Flowjo software.
For sorting, 5 OD of cells were stained with 5mL of 13.4 nM M2B10 or M1H5 and 1H6; 0.1 OD of positive and negative control were stained with 100 μL of antibodies at the same concentrations, followed by detection with 1:200 secondary antibodies (Alexa647 anti-human Fc and Alexa488 anti-mouse Fc), and sorted on a FACSAria (BD). Gates were drawn around populations with diminished binding (P4) and normal binding (P7) to respective antibodies. Another gate (P5) in between was drawn to circumvent the population with reduced binding. Sorted cells were collected in tubes containing YNB-CAA-glucose medium and grown at 30°C until OD600 >2.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies used are displayed in
Table 1.
The lineage cocktail consisted of CD3, CD8α, CD19 and Gr1 (Biolegend, London, UK). Dead cells were excluded using fixable viability dye eFluor 450 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) (4°C, 15 minutes). Surface staining was carried out in PBS supplemented with 1% FCS (4°C, 15 minutes). Intracellular staining was carried out using Human FoxP3 Buffer (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were acquired on an LSRFortessa II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo v.X.0.7 (RRID SCR_008520; Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometry Profiling of Hepatic Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry assay (using BD LSR Fortessa II) was carried out on hepatic non-parenchymal cells which are composed of the total profile of hepatic leukocyte population. The experiments were performed as published (18 (link)). The following pre-conjugated antibodies were used: CD11B (552850, BD bioscience), CD45 (553083, BD bioscience). Briefly, Hepatic macrophages were defined as viable CD45+ CD11B+ F4/80+ cells from digested livers and used to identify macrophage subsets. Subsets were expressed as proportions of total hepatic macrophages or CD45+ cells. And we collected 10,000 cells every time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometry Protocol for Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed in adherence to Cossarizza et al. (89 (link)). Flow cytometric Abs are shown in Supplemental Table 2. Cells were extracellularly stained in the presence of the fixable viability dye eFluor 780 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to exclude dead cells. Staining for intracellular markers was performed using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data were acquired using an LSR Fortessa II, A5 Symphony (BD Biosciences), or CytoFLEX (Beckman Coulter) cell analyzer and analyzed using FlowJo, version 10.7.1 (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mitophagy Assay in SH-SY5Y and ARPE-19 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SH‐SY5Y and ARPE19 cells, stably expressing mcherry‐GFP‐FIS1, were grown on 6‐cm dishes until reaching 70% confluency and treated with either DMSO or PF‐04620110 (5 μM) and PF‐06424439 (5 μM), as indicated, for 24 h in the presence or absence of DFP. Cells were harvested for analysis by washing once with PBS, followed by trypsinisation with trypsin–EDTA (0.25%) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cells were then fixed in 3.7% PFA/10 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, for 15 min and finally re‐suspended in 0.4 ml of Dulbecco’s PBS containing 1% FBS into 5‐ml Falcon round‐bottom polystyrene test tubes 12 × 75 mm (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Flow cytometry data were acquired on an LSR Fortessa II with DIVA software (BD Biosciences). Cells were gated according to their forward‐ and side‐scatter profiles. 488‐nm laser was used to detect GFP in emission filter 530/30 and 561‐nm laser to detect mCherry in emission filter 610/20. Data were analysed using FlowJo software v10.7.1 (BD Biosciences). 20–50,000 cells were analysed per condition, with fluorescent detection in green and red channels. Increased mitophagy was determined for individual cells by detecting decreased green versus red fluorescence, based on gating determined by the green and red fluorescence of vehicle (DMSO)–treated control cells. For treatments, cells were at 60–70% confluency for FACS on the day of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Surface Staining and Cytokine Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell surface staining, antibodies conjugated to FITC, PE, APC, Alexafluor 647 (A647), APC-efluor780 (APCe780), and PerCPCy5.5 were obtained from either BD Pharmingen, eBioscience or Biolegend. Fc receptors were blocked using Fc Block (BD Pharmingen). Antibody clones used were: CD4 (RM4-5), CD8a (53-6.7), TCRβ (H57-597), CD44 (IM7), CD45.1 (A20), CD45.2 (104) and CD98 (RC388). Cells were fixed using 1% paraformaldehyde. Standard intracellular cytokine staining protocols were followed for IFNγ (clone XMG1.2; Biolegend) staining. Data were acquired on a LSR Fortessa II with DIVA software or a FACSVerse flow cytometer with FACSuite software (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FlowJo software version 9.9.5 (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Cycle Analysis of THP-1 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell cycle analysis was carried out as previously described [29 (link)]. THP-1 cells were treated with ATC cell-derived CM or DMEM (control) for 24 h, after which cells were collected and fixed with cold 70% ethanol and stored at −20 °C for at least 2 h. Then, the cells were washed in PBS buffer and incubated with 1 µg/mL 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution for 10 min before being analyzed. The cell cycle profiles were determined using flow cytometry (LSR Fortessa II, BD Bioscience) and analyzed with FlowJo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!