The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss program version 25

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. Version 25 provides data management, statistical analysis, and modeling capabilities. The core function of the program is to enable users to analyze data and make statistical inferences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

39 protocols using spss program version 25

1

SPSS Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Responses were collected and analyzed by using the statistical packages for the social sciences (SPSS) program version 25 released in 2017 from IBM SPSS statistics cooperation, USA. The frequency and percentage of responses were tabulated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS program version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the obtained data statistically. The mean and standard error were used to summarize our data. For comparisons between groups, variance analysis (ANOVA) was used with a multiple comparisons post hoc test for every two groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Factors Predicting Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables recorded during the study were summarized. Frequencies and percentages (with 95% confidence interval [CI] for the primary endpoint) were provided for categorical variables. Mean and standard deviation were provided for continuous variables. The analysis was stratified by type of patient (surgical vs. medical), type of surgery, country, and specialty of the doctors. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted using the baseline factors to assess their effect as predictors of the appropriate use of VTE prophylaxis. A p-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS program version 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Predicting COVID-19 Severity Using Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS program version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, RRID:SCR_016479) was used to analyze the data. The study variables were explained using descriptive statistics (e.g., frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and range). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis, each marker was plotted against COVID severity with the value of state variable set as (2) indicating severe COVID infection. Logistic regression to determine the predictors, Chi square to determine the difference between DM and non-DM participants, and ANOVA tests was used to determine the difference between different degree of DM patients. P-value for our study was determined at level of (.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean (M)±standard deviation (SD) of experimental data were statistically analyzed by the SPSS program version 25 (IBM, USA). ANOVA followed by LSD test was conducted to identify the intergroup comparisons (significant values at P<0.05). The mean ± SD of the results were used in the present study because they are not affected by the sample size and indicate how accurately the mean represents the sample of data. At first, the normality tests (skewness and Kurtosis) were performed and revealed the normal data distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and continued with the Tukey post-hoc test. Normality test was conducted, where a p>0.05 was considered normally distribute data. Statistical significance was considered at a value of p<0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS program version 25 (IBM, New York, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IBM-SPSS program version 25 was used for statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc analysis were carried out to compare more than two groups, and if only two groups were compared, t-test independent samples were used. The findings of three independent experiments are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analyzing Blood Vessel Density via SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS program version 25 (IBM, Armonk, City, NY, USA) was used. Descriptive statistics included mean, standard deviation, median, and percentiles. Group comparisons were performed using a Mann-Whitney test. The linear correlation between two variables was measured by Pearson correlation coefficient. Linear regression model was used to predict blood vessel density by several independent parameters. A threshold of p ≤ 0.05 was set to determine significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analyzing Workers' Perception and Reliability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After obtaining all the data, the Microsoft excel version 2018 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS program version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) were used to analyze such information.
The categorical variables were described by their absolute and relative frequency and the measures of central dispersion (mean, median, confidence intervals at 95% (CI), and interquartile range (IQR)). To compare the goodness-of-fit to an average distribution of data from continuous or discrete quantitative variables, the Shapiro–Wilk test and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov were applied accordingly to the variables, and the Levene test contrasted the homoscedasticity of variances. The normalization tests indicated that the data did not follow normality (p < 0.01). For the comparison of two independent arithmetic means, the Mann–Whitney U test was used, as indicated. The chi-square U, Kendall’s tau-b, Phi and Cramer’s V, and Spearmen’s correlations tests were used accordingly. Furthermore, multivariant models, such as regressions, were used accordingly. The Cronbach’s alpha test was used for determining the reliability of the survey, showing a really good reliability of the test to measure the workers’ perception (0.85).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predictive Biomarker for Tolvaptan Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistics were performed using the SPSS program version 25 (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Continuous and categorical variables are expressed as medians (range) and numbers, respectively. Changes in values during TLV treatment were analyzed using Friedman's test. Continuous and categorical variables of responders and non-responders were compared using Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to determine correlations between WFA + -M2BP levels before TLV treatment and clinical features. The optimal cut-off value for predicting the response of TLV was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. All tests were two-sided, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!