The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uhplc ms

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The UHPLC-MS is an analytical instrument that combines Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) technologies. The UHPLC component provides high-resolution separation of complex samples, while the MS component enables sensitive and precise detection and identification of the separated compounds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using uhplc ms

1

Quantification of Flavonoid Compounds in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of the samples was identified by UHPLC-MS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The chromatographic column was ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm × 1.7 μm). The ratio of formic acid and water was 1:1000 in mobile phase A. Methanol was chosen as mobile phase B. Gradient elution conditions were as follows: 0–15.0 min, 5% B; 15.0–18.0 min, 5–80% B; 18.0–18.1 min,100–5% B; 18.1–21 min, 5% B. The flow rate was 0.3 mL·min−1. The column temperature was 30 °C. The injection volume was 1 μL. The electrospray ionization was 300 °C. The transfer capillary temperature was 320 °C. The spray voltage in positive ion mode was 3.0 kV. The scan modes were selected as Full MS and Full MS/dd-MS2, respectively. The primary and secondary scan resolutions were 70,000 and 17,500. The flow rates of sheath gas and auxiliary gas were 206 and 69 kPa. The mass range was 100–1000 Da.
The content of the characteristic flavonoid component was determined by the external standard method. The standard working curve of flavonoids was established by the ratio of peak area and sample concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Analysis of Cell Wall Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mild acidolysis was performed as the described method (de Souza et al., 2018 (link); Eugene et al., 2020 (link); Lapierre et al., 2019 (link)) with slight modifications. In brief, 10 mg of CWRs was mixed with 1 ml of 50 mM TFA (Sigma‐Aldrich) and incubated at 100 °C for up to 4 h with shaking at 750 rpm. The samples were then centrifuged at 19 500 g. 400 μL of supernatant was dried and re‐dissolved in 100 μL of 80% methanol. 2 μL of them was analysed via UHPLC‐MS (ThermoFisher Scientific) as described above. For alkaline digestion, the rest 500 μL of the TFA supernatant was dried and then treated with 2 N NaOH for 24 h at RT followed by neutralization with 6 N HCl. The samples were then extracted twice with 300 μL of water‐saturated ethyl acetate containing 100 μm t‐o‐coumaric acid as the internal standard. The combined extracts were dried and resuspended in 50% methanol with 0.1% formic acid. 3 μL of each sample were analysed in UHPLC‐MS as described for wall‐bound phenolics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LC-HRMS Analysis of Mouse Urine Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-HRMS analysis was
performed on a Waters Synapt XS HDMS coupled
with an ACQUITY UPLC I-Class system. Separation was carried out on
the Acquity Premier CSH C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm).
Mouse urine (25 μL) was diluted (10×) with solvent A. The
separation was performed using a binary gradient with 0.1% formic
acid in UHPLC-grade water (Honeywell) as solvent A and 0.1% formic
acid in acetonitrile as solvent B (UHPLC–MS, Thermo Scientific).
Gradient conditions: 0.0–11.0 min, 100–77% A; 11.0–14.6
min, 77–5% A; 14.6–17.0 min, 5% A; and 17.05–20.0
min, 100% A. The following settings were used: flow rate, 0.5 mL/min;
sample injection volume, 1 μL; column temperature, 50 °C;
sample temperature, 5 °C. Synapt XS HDMS data were acquired in
the negative ion MSe mode. Authentic standards of 3HPMA and 23HPMA
in water (100 ng/mL) were also prepared and analyzed using identical
conditions to confirm and validate the assignments in urine samples
(retention time, MS/MS, and external database match). The Waters UNIFI
software package was used for data analysis and metabolite identification.
The El-Maven and PollyPhi packages (Elucidata, MA) were used to assign 13C-labeled isotopologues, as well as to correct for the natural
abundance of 13C, as described previously.37 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THSWD was diluted 10 times with double-distilled water. The reference substances of gallic acid, ferulic acid, paeoniflorin, hydroxysafflor yellow A, amygdalin, and ligustilide were accurately weighed and dissolved in methanol to make the mass concentrations respectively 0.2037, 0.02625, 0.3159, 0.0565, 0.1287, 0.5000 mg/mL single reference solution. And the single reference solution was stored at − 20 ℃.
Samples were filtered with a 0.22 μm membrane before UHPLC-MS (Thermo Fisher, United States) analysis. Analytes were separated using a SunFire-C18 column (3.0 mm×150 mm, 3.5 μm) with a column temperature of 25℃ and a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Mobile phase B was acetonitrile, and the mobile phase A was water containing 0.5% formic acid. A gradient elution program was applied (0–10 min, 5–7% B; 10–35 min, 17–22% B; 35–40 min, 22–65% B; 40–45 min, 65–80% B; 45–50 min, 80% B). The detection wavelengths are, respectively, 210, 230, 328, and 403 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification of Bioactive Compounds via UHPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We obtained an OFF1 of 4.6 g. The fraction OFF1 was selected and identified by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (thermoultimate 3000) coupled to mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS, Thermo Scientific, Pleasanton, CA, USA) according to our previous report [23 (link)]. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: Hypersil GOLD aQ C18 (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.9 μm); column temperature: 40 °C; flow rate: 0.4 mL/min; mobile phase: acetonitrile (A) and water (B); gradient elution program: 2% A (0–2 min), 2–98% A (2–15 min). The mass spectrometric conditions were as follows: ion source: HESI-source (positive and negative ion mode); capillary temperature: 320 °C; auxiliary gas temperature: 350 °C; sheath gas: 40 arb; aux gas: 10 arb; spray voltage: 4.00 kV (+)/2.80 kV (−); resolution: 70,000 (full scan), 17,500 (dd-MS2); normalized collision energy: 20, 30, 40 Ev; scan range: 100–1500 m/z. We identified the main compounds in bioactive fraction by Predicted Compositions, mzCloud Search, MassList Search, mzVault Search and ChemSpider Search Library.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolomic Analysis of Huh7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells used for the metabolomic analysis were cultured in a 10 cm dish until Huh7 reached 70% confluence, and the DFO was added to the medium to reach the desired concentration. Three days after DFO addition, adherent cells were detached and collected, washed 3 times with PBS, stored at −80 °C, and sent to Metabolon Inc. for further analysis (n = 3). Metabolomic and statistical analyses were carried out at Metabolon (Morrisville, NC, USA), following previously described methods [17 (link),18 (link)]. In summary, cellular pellets (5 × 105 cells) were subjected to methanol extraction. The resulting extract was then subdivided into portions for analysis using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS,) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in positive, negative, or polar ion modes, as well as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Identification of metabolites was accomplished by matching ion features against a reference library of chemical standards using an automated process, which was subsequently followed by visual inspection to ensure quality control. For statistical computations and data presentation, any absent values were treated as being below the detection thresholds, and these values were estimated using the lowest compound value available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!