The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss v 21.0 statistical software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS v.21.0 is a statistical software package designed for data analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical analysis, and visualization. The software supports a wide range of data types and statistical techniques, making it suitable for a variety of research and business applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using spss v 21.0 statistical software

1

Canine Gut Microbiome and Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data on the growth performance (feed intake, body weight), ATTD, routine blood parameters, serum biochemical parameters, and SCFA content were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM). All the data mentioned above were validated by a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and the results showed that all data followed normal distribution. These data were then analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc multiple comparison tests using SPSS v.21.0 statistical software.
The data on 16S RNA processing are described in the “Data processing” section. The statistical differences in the final data were also expressed as mean ± SEM except the relative abundance of the top 10 bacteria at the phylum level (Fig 1A). Fig 1A also describes the relative abundance in each dog. The data on 16S RNA processing was also analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc multiple comparison tests using SPSS v.21.0 statistical software.
A P value < 0.05 was considered significant, whereas 0.05 < P value < 0.10 was considered a tendency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Survival Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS v.21.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism v.8.01 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) were employed for statistical analyses and mapping. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. An independent t-test was applied for comparisons among groups. Count data were expressed as the number of cases/percentages and tested by X2 test. The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the survival curve was drawn. COX regression model was adopted to analyze the factors affecting postoperative survival. P-value of < 0.05 was indicative of statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS v21.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to process the data. All data were first subjected to the Shapiro‒Wilk test to determine the normality of data distribution. Normally distributed data were represented as mean ± standard deviation, and the paired samples t-test was used to compare the data between treatment time points. Non-normally distributed data with uneven variance are represented by mean [25th percentile, 75th percentile]. The signed-rank test was used to compare the data between treatment time points. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical data between treatment time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric and Body Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS V.21.0 statistical software (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, USA) was used for data analysis. After testing the data distribution and variance homogeneity, the measurement data, such as height, weight,age, body composition measurements and other components were normally distributed variables and expressed as the mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups were made using independent-sample t- tests. Height-for-age z score, weight-for-age z score and BMI-for-age z score were non-normally distributed variables and expressed as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) and the non-parametric Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test was used between two groups. The classification data, such as sex, were expressed as numbers and compared by χ2 test. Statistical significance was set at a p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Measurement Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS V.21.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the measurement data, and the mean ± standard deviation is shown in the figures. Student's t‐test and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the means of two or more groups depending on whether the data was normally distributed. Spearman's correlation test was used for correlation analysis. Significance was determined as *p < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Statistical software R (The R Group for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) were used to visualize the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the experimental data were assessed using SPSS v21.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc.), and the values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Data distribution was determined by measuring kurtosis and skewness. Statistical significance was determined by a Student’s t-test or ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Abnormal Liver Function ADR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NCCS data were analysed by χ2 test, Wilcoxon test, and univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses. Abnormal liver function ADR was the dependent variable, while possible causes like admission condition, allergy history, payment method, comorbidities, solvent type, dosage, duration of administration, and top 43 frequently combined drugs were independent variables(Supplementary Table 1). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V21.0 statistical software. Meta-analysis data were processed using R3.5.0 software. The confidence interval for each effect variable was expressed as 95% CI. Homogeneity test (Q test) was used to evaluate heterogeneity. The test level was α = 0.1, and the size of heterogeneity was quantitatively determined by combining I2 (judgment criterion P ≥ 0.1 or I2 ≤ 50%)25 (link),26 (link). Heterogeneity was considered significant when p < 0.1 and I2 > 50%. When P ≥ 0.1 and I2 ≤ 50%, the fixed-effect model was used for the meta-analysis; otherwise, a random-effect model was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!