The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using osteomeasure image analysis system

1

Histopathological Analysis of Murine Joints

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hind paws were prepared and analyzed by using previously described histopathologic techniques [32 (link)-35 (link)]. Staining with H&E allowed a general assessment, and toluidine blue (TB) destaining was performed to determine cartilage matrix loss. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed to identify osteoclasts. Histomorphometric parameters (area of cartilage destruction, inflammation and erosion, as well as osteoclast numbers) were quantified by using the OsteoMeasure™ image analysis system (OsteoMetrics, Decatur, GA, USA).
Additional immunohistochemistry was done for T cells (anti-CD3; Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK), B cells (anti-CD45 receptor; BD Biosciences PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), macrophages (clone F4/80; AbD Serotec, Puchheim, Germany) and granulocytes (MCA771G; AbD Serotec) as reported previously [33 (link)-35 (link)], followed by quantitative analysis of the inflammatory infiltrate by tissue cytometry using HistoQuest™ software (TissueGnostics, Vienna, Austria) [36 (link),37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histomorphometric Analysis of Tumor Burden

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Legs, including femora and tibiae, were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, decalcified in 14% EDTA, and embedded in Tissue-Tek. Frozen sections (8μm thick) were cut using a Leica CM1850 cryostat (Leica, German). 1) Sections were mounted with a mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Lab., Burlingame, CA, USA) for GFP+ tumor burden examination. 2) Adjacent sections were stained with H&E for general histology. Histomorphometric analyses were performed on sections cut at 3 representative levels in each sample using CMSR SOPs (43 (link),44 (link)). In brief, sections were numbered blindly and were converted to digital images using an Olympus VS120 whole slide imaging system (Olympus, Center Valley, PA). GFP+ areas were analyzed using Image Pro-Plus version 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). The percentage of trabecular bone area over total tissue area was analyzed using OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System (OsteoMetrics, Decatur, GA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Bone Histomorphometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone histomorphometry analysis was performed on the L3-L5 vertebrae, as previously described 25 (link), 26 . Femur sections were processed in Periodate- Lysine-Paraformaldehyde Fixative (TIANDZ) for 24h. A Shandon Finesse ME microtome was used to section unstained femur sections that were 4 µm thick before they were examined under fluorescence microscopy prior to calcein double labeling analysis. The average width along with the labeling period (days between injections of 10 μg/g calcein intraperitoneally at 7 days and 2 days before euthanasia) was then used to calculate the mineralizing surface (MS/BS, %), bone formation rate (BFR, μm3μm-2 per day) and mineral apposition rate (MAR, μm per day).
L3-L5 vertebrae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h and subjected to 48 hours of exposure to 70% ethanol before being decalcified in 10% EDTA for 14-21 days. The processed samples were finally paraffin-embedded, sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm, and stained by hematoxylin-eosin staining (H&E) and tartaric acid-resistant acid phosphatase staining (TRAP). The bone histomorphometry parameters, including osteoblast surfaces (Ob.S/BS, %), number of osteoclasts (N.Oc/B.Pm, /mm) and osteoclast surfaces (Oc.S/BS, %), were analyzed by an investigator blinded to sample collection and group assignment using an OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System (Osteometrics, Decatur, GA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Bone Formation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcein (10 mg kg−1) and xylenol orange (90 mg kg−1) (both from Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were injected subcutaneously on days 13 and 3 before sacrifice, respectively. After termination, femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution, followed by dehydration using gradient ethanol, vitrification by xylene and embedded in methyl methacrylate. The bones were cut coronally into 10 µm thick sections with the RM2155 hard tissue microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The double labeling images of bone slices were captured using a fluorescent microscope (Leica DM5500 system, Germany). Cortical bone formation was analyzed in four randomly selected visual fields in the midshaft of femur. Mineral apposition rate (MAR) was analyzed by OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System (Osteometrics, Decatur, GA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Femur Decalcification and Osteoclast Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right femurs were decalcified at room temperature in 10% buffered ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 2 weeks. Then, the bones were dehydrated using gradient ethanol, vitrified by xylene, and embedded in paraffin. 5 µm thick sections were prepared with a rotary microtome (RM2255; Leica Microsystems, Germany), then followed by TRAP staining and counterstained with Fast Green. For the analysis of osteoclasts, five fields of view in the distal femur were randomly selected for each bone slice. The Oc. N/BS, mm−1 was analyzed using an OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System (Osteometrics, Decatur, GA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluation of Bone Marrow Adiposity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For evaluation of bone marrow adiposity in proximal tibia, longitudinal sections (5 µm thick) were cut on a Jung Reichart microtome as described [60 (link)]. Measurements were performed in unstained sections under ultraviolet illumination in a sampling site located in the metaphysis, immediately below the growth plate. All measurements were performed with the OsteoMeasure Image Analysis system (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Decatur, GA, USA). Bone marrow adiposity (adipocyte area/tissue area, %), adipocyte number (number/tissue area, #/mm2), and adipocyte size (µm2) were determined as described [61 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Analysis of Murine Joint Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For μCT, knee joints were dissected free of soft tissue, fixed overnight in 10% buffered formalin, and scanned at high resolution (10.5 μm) on a VivaCT40 μCT scanner (Scanco Medical) using 300ms integration time, 55 kVp energy, and 145 μA intensity. 3D images were generated using a constant threshold of 275 for all samples. For histology and histomorphometric analyses, knee and ankle joints were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, decalcified in 10% EDTA, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 4 μm thickness for 3 levels (50 μm apart). Sections were stained with H&E for routine histology and for TRAP activity to identify osteoclasts. The stained sections were digitized using a whole slide imaging system (Olympus VS120). Osteoclast numbers/mm bone surface, bone volume/tissue volume, inflamed area/tissue area and eroded surface/bone surface were analyzed on one section from each level using an osteomeasure image analysis system (Osteometrics)8 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histomorphometric Analysis of Vertebral Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After micro-CT scanning, L3-L5 vertebrae were decalcified for 3 wk using 10% EDTA at 4°C, processed, and embedded in paraffin. 3-μm-thick sections at the center of the vertebrae with fewest trabeculae, selected from a series of continuously cut sections to ensure the measurement of all the sections was comparable, were blindly quantified for histomorphometric parameters, including the structural trabecular bone parameters, BV/TV (%), Tb.Th (μm), Tb.N (#/mm), Tb.Sp (μm), and OB surfaces on H&E-stained sections, and OC parameters on TRAP-stained sections using an OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System (Osteometrics, Decatur, GA) 50 (link),51 (link) following the recommendations of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee 53 (link). T12 to L2 vertebrae were processed as LR white plastic-embedded blocks, as we reported previously 50 (link),51 (link). 3 μm-thick plastic sections were cut using a carbide steel knife on a Shandon Microtome. Sections at the center of the vertebrae were collected to evaluate the dynamic parameters of bone formation using an OsteoMeasure Image Analysis System, as we reported previously 50 (link),51 (link), following the recommendations of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee 53 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Mineralization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 4 days and 1 day prior to sacrifice, mice were injected subcutaneously with calcein (10 mg/kg) to label mineralizing bone. Distal femora were processed for static and dynamic histomorphometry as previously described. (18 (link)) Sections were stained according to the Von Kossa method with a tetrachrome counter stain (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) for assessment of cell-based measurements. Unstained sections were used for assessment of bone area and dynamic histomorphometry. Bone area/tissue area (%), trabecular number (mm-1), trabecular thickness (μm), trabecular spacing (μm), mineralizing perimeter/bone perimeter (double-labeled perimeter + ½ single-labeled perimeter, %), mineral apposition rate (μm/day), bone formation rate/bone perimeter (μm2/μm/y), bone formation rate/bone area (%/year) and osteoclast perimeter/bone perimeter (%) were determined using the Osteomeasure image analysis system (OsteoMetrics Inc., Atlanta, GA) as described. (18 (link)) Additionally, mineralizing perimeter/bone perimeter (%), mineral apposition rate (μm/day) and bone formation rate/bone perimeter (μm2/μm/y) were determined on the endocortex of the femoral diaphysis. All data are reported using standardized units and nomenclature for bone histomorphometry. (27 (link))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!