The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pm160t

Manufactured by Thorlabs
Sourced in United States

The PM160T is a high-performance optical power meter from Thorlabs. It is designed to measure optical power in a wide range of applications. The device features a large, easy-to-read display and supports a variety of detectors and modules for versatile measurements.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using pm160t

1

Laser Power Density Measurement in Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dogs were administered with 0.2-0.3 mg/kg of diazepam intravenously (IV) and 0.3-0.5 mg/kg of morphine sulfate intramuscularly. The surgical site was clipped and the tissue thickness was measured in each dog using ultrasonography (Logic® S7, GE, USA) with a frequency of 10 MHz and a broad-spectrum linear probe (9L-D) by the same operator. A cephalic IV catheter was placed, and lactated Ringer’s solution was given at 10 ml/kg/h. Each dog was anesthetized using thiopental sodium 10 mg/kg IV and maintained with isoflurane 1-2% in pure oxygen.
The 830 nm diode LILT (Class 3B laser: BTL 5000 series, BTL Industries Ltd., UK) was set at a power of 200 mW as in the previous studies [22 (link),23 (link)]. The radiant exposure was set at 4 J/cm2 which has been recommended for the treatment of inflammation, wounds, and superficial pain [24 ]. Both CW and PW modes with frequency of 50 Hz were irradiated for 60 s over the power meter without tissue (air) as the control and with tissues (skin-muscle tissue and skin) (Figures-1 and 2). The power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs®, USA) was used to measure the laser power density, which was represented by MOP. The laser probe was held above the tissue surface at different distances at 0 (contact), 1, and 5 cm tissue-laser probe distances. The MOPs were recorded at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 s using Thorlabs power meter software (Figure-3a and b).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Emissivity-Calibrated Temperature Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the temperature measurement, the emissivity of each sample was measured. A black tape (HB-250, OPTEX Co., Ltd., Shiga, Japan) with a known emissivity of 0.95 was used as a reference for the emissivity measurement. The paper and the black tape were heated to 50 °C by a temperature controller (SBX-303, Sakaguchi E.H VOC Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Then, a digital thermometer (MT-309, MotherTool Co. Ltd., Ueda, Japan) with a thermal couple sensor (TP-11, MotherTool Co. Ltd., Ueda, Japan) was used to ensure that both the paper and the black tape achieved the same temperature. By adjusting the temperature of the paper measured with an infrared thermal camera (FLIR ETS320, FLIR Systems. Inc., Wilsonville, USA), according to the reference temperature of the black tape, the emissivity of the paper was measured. In the temperature measurement, a solar simulator (AM1.5G, wavelength: 350–1800 nm, HAL-320W, Asahi Spectra Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used as the light source. The power intensity was measured by a thermal sensor power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs, Inc., New Jersey, USA). The samples were placed on an acrylic plate, which had a hole (Φ 70 mm) in the middle. After emissivity calibration of each sample, the surface temperature changes of the samples during illumination of solar simulator were recorded by the infrared thermal camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

One-Photon Optogenetic Stimulation in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For V1 one-photon optogenetic experiments, an optical fiber (400μm diameter, 0.39 nA; Thorlabs Inc.) coupled to a 455 nm LED (M4553, Thorlabs) and attached to a LED driver (LEDD1B, Thorlabs), was placed above the mouse’s window using a micromanipulator. Light power was calibrated daily and measured from the tip end of the fiber using a power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs). The light power used during photostimulation was 2.0 mW for all mice. Optogenetic stimulation trials were 33% of all trails in intermittent blocks, pseudo-randomly distributed in blocks. Light was delivered at a random time prior to the stimulus onset, between 300 – 3000 ms, to avoid cueing the mouse to the trial start. Light was sustained until the end of the response window. A custom designed removable light blocking system was attached to the head of the mouse to prevent the mice from seeing the optogenetic stimulation light. A masking light and a plastic eye patch over the left eye were also placed to prevent additional extraneous cues.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photostimulation During Contrast Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-photon (1p) photostimulation during contrast detection task was delivered using an optical fiber (400μm diameter, 0.39 nA; Thorlabs Inc.) coupled to a 470-nm LED (M470F3, Thorlabs) driven by an LED driver (LEDD1B; Thorlabs Inc.) and positioned using a micromanipulator over the location of V1 at the posterior of the window. Light power was calibrated at the end of the fiber using a power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs). Stimulation power was calibrated to each mouse and ranged from 0.05 to 0.4 mW out of the fiber. For control wildtype mice, 0.5 mW was used for all mice. To prevent photostimulation from interfering with behavioral performance, we attached a custom designed light-blocking cone to the mouse head and illuminated blue LED masking lights during the entire session. To further reduce any extraneous cues, we covered the left eye with a plastic eye patch. Light was delivered from the onset of the stimulus to the end of the response window on 33% of trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polarized and Unpolarized FTIR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unpolarized FTIR absorption spectra were collected at 2 cm−1 spectral resolution, and light-induced unpolarized spectra at 4 cm−1 resolution, using either a Vertex 80v or a Vertex 80 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker) equipped with a photovoltaic MCT detector. Polarized absorption spectra were collected at 4 cm−1 resolution on a Nicolet 5700 (ThermoFisher) FTIR spectrometer equipped with a photoconductive MCT, using a BaF2 holographic wire grid polarizer (Thorlabs) mounted on a motorized rotational stage (Thorlabs, PRM1/MZ8). Polarized light-induced FTIR difference spectra were measured similarly, but on a Vertex 80 FTIR spectrometer. Illumination during transmission experiments was achieved using @365 nm and @447 nm LEDs, with power densities at the sample of ∼400 mW/cm2 and ∼200 mW/cm2, as measured with a powermeter (Thorlabs, PM160T). For ATR experiments the samples were illuminated from the top, with @365 nm and @455 nm LEDS coupled to optical fibers, with power densities at the sample of ∼20 mW/cm2. All the experiments were conducted at room temperature (∼25°C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

3D Printing of Osteochondral Defects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The G-code for the 3D printing operation was obtained using Repetier Host software and an STL file of a previously obtained osteochondral defect model. A first layer height of 0.25 mm, layer height of 0.1 mm, infill density of 100%, printing nozzle feed of 3 mm/s and printing nozzle size of 0.84 mm were selected for this experiment. In addition, the G-code was manually modified to exclude unnecessary/not currently supported commands (all commands with F operation codes) and later sent to the manipulator controller using Repetier Host software.
The 365 nm ultraviolet (UV) light required for material curing was delivered by three light-emitting diodes (NCSU276AT-0365, Nichia, Japan). The UV light intensity was verified using a hand-held optical power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs, USA) and found to be 39 mW/cm2 at 365 nm, in plane, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the attachment, at the tip of the nozzle.
The 3D printing attachment was mounted on the manipulator, and its position was registered using the autocalibration function in the manipulator’s firmware. The 3D printing setup is shown in Fig. 4(C).
UV light was used during the entire printing process, as well as 10 minutes after, for fully curing the most superficial layers of the print.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optogenetic Manipulation of Sensory Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For optogenetic experiments light was delivered via a 400μm diameter optical fiber resting on the thinned skull over S1 or V1. Either a 470nm LED (M470F3, Thorlabs) at 8–12mW (for eGtACR1 expressing or PV-Cre::Ai32 mice) or 617nm LED (M617F2, Thorlabs) at 15–18 mW (for eNpHR3.0 expressing mice) was used. Light intensity was controlled by analog outputs to the LED driver (LEDD1B, Thorlabs) and calibrated with a photodiode and power meter (PM160T, Thorlabs). For behavioral experiments, a square light pulse was applied for 2 second intervals. To ensure photoinhibition before the first whisker contact and throughout the response window, optogenetic stimulation started 1 second prior to the stimulus reaching the target position and was sustained until the end of the response window. Optogenetic stimulation trials were randomly chosen on 33% of all trials. A masking light (blue for eGtACR1 and PV-Cre∷Ai32 experiments, red for eNpHR3.0 experiments) was used to control for LED stimulation on all trials and an eye patch was positioned over the right eye of the mouse to prevent any visual cue which may have been gained through the masking light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!