The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

91 protocols using r program

1

Statistical Analysis and Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were conducted using the R program (version 4.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Joinpoint software (version 4.9.0.0. March 2021; Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute). Data visualization was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., USA), QGIS (version 3.22; QGIS Geographic Information System), and R program (version 4.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bioinformatics Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Modeling, data analysis, and data mining were performed using the BRB array tool25 (link) and R-program (version 2.14.2; www.r-project.org). Consensus clustering analysis was performed using GenePattern from the Broad Institute with the “ConsensusClustering” and “NMFConsensus” modules and pipelines26 (link). Statistical analyses for association tests were performed using Stata/IC statistical software (version 12; StataCorp, TX) or the R-program (version 2.14.2; www.r-project.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Assessing Ischemic Stroke Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations (mean ± SD) and compared by using the Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages (n, %) and compared by using the Chi-square test. Considering that the proportional hazards assumption showed no strong evidence of departure, cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for ischemic stroke by the components of DBI-16 and the indicators of diet quality. The level of statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05 of two-side probability. All analyses were performed using the R program (version 4.0.4, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and all figures were performed by using GraphPad Prism software (version 9, GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Outcomes in Transplant Complications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were expressed as medians (25%‐75% interquartile range [IQR]). The chi‐square test or 2‐sided Fisher’s exact test was used for qualitative variables, and the Student t test or Mann‐Whitney U test was used for quantitative variables. Survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier curve method and compared using the log‐rank test. As the variable ABC during the 12 months following transplantation (first‐year ABC) was time dependent, we used the robust score test in the Cox proportional hazards model. Multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox proportional hazards model and tested with the robust score test in ascending steps with a P value at 5%.
Correlation factor (ρ) was obtained by the method of Schemper et al.(23) Survival rates and correlations included every arterial or biliary complication, graft loss, or death within 60 months.
All variables with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat version 12.0 (Systat Software Inc., Erkrath, Germany) and R program version 3.3.3 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ordination Methods for Vegetation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We explored several ordination methods available in the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AT) through the JUICE vegetation analysis package (Tichý, 2002). Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA; Hill & Gauch, 1980) provided the clearest, most easily interpreted separation of plots along complex environmental gradients. Plot and species similarities were calculated using the Sørenson similarity index. Rare species were down‐weighted and the axes scaled according to the program defaults. The four main DCA axes 1, 2, 3 and 4 were correlated with continuous and ordinal environmental variables in each plot using species–environment correlations in the program CONOCO via JUICE. Only variables with ≤ 0.002 determined by global permutation test with forward selection (number of permutations: 499) are shown in the biplot diagrams.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Regression Analysis of Arterial Stiffness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages and quantitative variables as means ± standard deviation. Quantitative variables were compared using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the effect of variables on AIx@75 and PWV. Variables with p<0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in a saturated model and assessed with a stepwise strategy. The quality of fit was assessed by the R2 value and residual analysis. Analyses were performed using the R program (The R Foundation, Auckland, New Zealand), version 3.3.2, and a significance level of 5% was adopted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Transcriptomic Analysis of Colorectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA expression data (level 3) of CRC patients—obtained from 622 CRC cancer tissues and 51 adjacent non-tumor normal tissues (up to June 13, 2018)—were downloaded from the TCGA data portal. The expression profiles of RNA and miRNA from the 673 samples had been derived from the IlluminaHiSeq RNASeq and the IlluminaHiSeq miRNASeq sequencing platforms. The mRNAs, lncRNAs, and pseudogenes were identified based on the annotation from the Ensembl database (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html, version 93). RNAs not included in the Ensembl database were excluded from the present study. We mainly used the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/) for analysis of RNA data. Raw counts data were normalized by the edgeR package [6 (link)] and then transformed by the limma package [7 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Characterization of Dental Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental comparison between groups was performed with one-way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) and post-hoc, with Duncan’s multiple comparison test; examined properties included microhardness, shear bond strength, antibacterial test, cell viability test, and pH cycle test. ARI was verified with the Kruskal-Wallis test. All statistical analysis was performed with the R program (version 3.5.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Predictors of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistical analysis was applied to ascertain baseline characteristics. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as means with standard deviations and were analyzed using Student’s T-test. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to test for the normality of data distribution in all datasets. To identify predictors of outcomes, intergroup covariates, including the binary variable of complication development, were evaluated using multivariate analysis, which was independently performed by logistic regression using the “enter” method. Age (e.g., child, adult, and older adult), surgical history, time from onset, and time to antibiotics from onset were adjusted.
We used the Jamovi statistical program (version 2.3.18, The Jamovi project, Sydney, Australia) and R program (version 4.2.2, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for all statistical analyses. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Association of Glycemic Measures with Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations (mean±SD) and compared by using Student's t-test. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages (n, %) and compared by using Chi-square test.
Restricted cubic-spline (RCS) plots with three knots were used to explore the shape of the association of FPG or 2h-PG with the primary outcomes (Figure 2). Age-adjusted and multi-adjusted cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for each tertile of or per one SD increase in baseline level of FPG and 2h-PG. Analyses were also conducted among participants within normal glycemia level and free of diabetes. Considering the possible effect modification by metabolic states, we repeated the above analysis in participants stratified by baseline level of SBP, TG or BMI, as well as the status of hypertension, dyslipidemia or obesity. Subgroup analysis were also performed in subgroups stratified by demographic factors (age, gender, ethnic group, and area).
The level of statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05 of two-side probability. All analyses and figures were performed by using R program (version 4.1.0, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!