Endnote x9

Following the search, all identified citations will be collated and uploaded into EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA) and duplicates removed. Titles and abstracts will then be screened by two independent reviewers (IMO, IS) for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. For this step, the Rayyan [36 (link)] platform will be used to facilitate reviewer independence. Potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full and their citation details imported into the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (Joanna Briggs Institute, Adelaide, Australia) [37 (link)]. The full text of selected citations will be assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers (PLS, HJJ) using JBI critical appraisal tools. Reasons for exclusion of full-text studies that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be recorded and reported in the systematic review. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the study selection process will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. A PRISMA flow diagram showing details of studies included and excluded at each stage of the study selection process will be provided [38 (link)].

This review will include studies relevant to individuals with disability from CALD backgrounds and their health and support service needs. Following the search, all identified citations will be collated and uploaded into Endnote X9 (Clarivate Analytics, PA, USA), and duplicates will be removed. Prior to each stage of screening, reviewers will pilot the eligibility criteria on a random sample of 20 titles/abstracts and 5 full-text studies, with further pilot rounds conducted on an as-needed basis. Titles and abstracts will be screened by at least two independent reviewers (JP, DL, AT, KC) for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. An initial calibration will be conducted on 5 randomly selected articles to ensure high inter-rater agreement. The full text of selected literature will be retrieved and assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria (see Additional file 3). Full-text papers that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded, and reasons for exclusion will be provided in an appendix in the final scoping review report. The results of the search will be reported in full in the final report and presented in a PRISMA flow diagram [42 (link)] (see Additional file 4). Any disagreement that arises between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion and consensus.

To identify the studies, we systematically searched Medline (through Pubmed), Scopus, ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Global Index Medicus, Scielo, Cochrane Library and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences). A search of the gray literature was performed through Google Scholar and MedRxiv. In addition, we performed a manual search identifying the journals of internationally recognized organizations in tuberculosis (Suplementary File 2) and by reviewing the bibliographic references of the review articles and included studies. Search terms such as “Community-Based related”, “Community-based interventions”, “participatory action research”, “participatory engagement”, “Community Participation” and “tuberculosis” were used (the complete list of search terms can be found in the Suplementary File 3). The choice of terms and search strategies were developed and refined through a discussion with the research team (Suplementary File 3). For the importation of articles and the elimination of duplicates, the reference manager used was Endnote X9 (Clarivate).

A systematic literature research of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), was conducted from the date of inception to January 31, 2022. References were imported into EndNote™ X9 software (Clarivate™, London, UK) for deduplication.The following search terms were used for PubMed: (“laparoscopy” [MeSH Terms] OR“laparoscopy”[All Fields]) AND (“shoulder pain”[MeSH Terms] OR (“shoulder”[All Fields]) AND ((“lung”[MeSH Terms] OR “lung”[All Fields] OR “pulmonary”[All Fields]) AND (“recruit”[All Fields] OR “recruitment”[All Fields] OR “recruitments”[All Fields]) AND (“maneuver”[All Fields] OR “maneuvered”[All Fields] OR “maneuvering”[All Fields] OR “maneuverings” [All Fields] OR “maneuvers”[All Fields]).
The titles and abstracts of the articles were screened, and the full texts of relevant articles were studied further. DX and LH independently reviewed all resulting search entries against the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then extracted data from the included studies using a data extraction form. Data on the author’s name, year of publication, type of surgery, interventions used and relevant outcomes were collected from each study.

We will use EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics) reference software to store, organize, and manage all the search results and ensure an efficient study selection process by removing the duplicate records. Two reviewers will independently evaluate the title and abstract of all studies identified through the search against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any disagreement between the individual judgments will be resolved by an additional reviewer. The screening process will be conducted in Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd), which is systematic review management software. The full text of the selected studies will then be retrieved. In the case of trial registrations, the full text is defined as all associated files and information. If the reviewer is uncertain about the eligibility of any study, the full text will be obtained for further information. An additional reviewer will be consulted, should there be any uncertainty or disagreement of the eligibility of studies. Disagreement on study eligibility will be resolved through consensus. Excluded studies and the reasons for exclusion will be recorded and documented.

Following the search, all identified records will be collated and uploaded into EndNote X9 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and duplicates removed. Following a pilot test, titles and abstracts will then be screened by two independent reviewers (A.Z. and S.M.) for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Potentially relevant papers will be retrieved in full and their citation details imported into the JBI System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI; JBI, Adelaide, Australia) [21 (link)]. The full text of selected citations will be assessed in detail against the inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Reasons for exclusion of full-text papers that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be recorded and reported in the scoping review. To select only the original indices and exclude the adapted and updated indices, at the full-text screening stage the earliest published papers will be first read. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the selection process will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer (S.S.). The results of the search will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram [22 (link)].