The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

45 protocols using uv visible spectrophotometer

1

Quantification of Mineralized Matrix

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 21 days of co‐culture, the samples were rinsed three times with PBS, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and finally the fixed samples were stained with ARS dye for 30 min. The stained samples were rinsed three times with deionized water to remove excess ARS dye. Images of the stained samples were obtained using fluorescence inverted microscopy. For further quantitative analysis of calcium deposition, the stained samples were reacted with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma‐Aldrich, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, and the supernatant was taken in a 96‐well plate, and the absorbance at 562 nm was measured by UV–visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In vitro Biodegradation of Cypermethrin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

In vitro biodegradation of cypermethrin was performed in 100 ml flask with 50 ml minimal salt medium, supplemented with 50 ppm cypermethrin and inoculated with 1 ml SG2 culture before optimization the biodegradation conditions. Bacterial inoculum was prepared by inoculating single colony in 50 ml of MSM. Inoculated flask was incubated in an incubator shaker @ 100 rpm at 30 °C. Bacterial cells from the log phase, harvested by centrifugation (5000 rpm for 10 min) and washed with minimal medium were used for the subsequent studies. Uninoculated medium acted as control. Bacterial growth was monitored by taking absorbance using UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer) and the residual cypermethrin concentration was measured by HPLC (Dionex), after extraction according to Anastassiades et al. (2003 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant Capacity Determination via DPPH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antioxidant molecules were extracted from 1 g of ground sample, using 5 mL of a methanol/water (70:30 v/v) solution, kept under motion for 60 min at room temperature, and then paper filtered. The solvent was evaporated, and the extract was then dissolved in 10 mL of methanol, thus centrifuged at 5040× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Analyses were performed in triplicate mixing 100 μL of surnatant and 1 mL of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) methanolic solution (0.2 mm), bringing the mix to a final volume of 2.4 mL with methanol. The absorbance of the solution was recorded at 517 nm by a Perkin Elmer UV-Visible spectrophotometer after an incubation time of 30 min in the dark at room temperature. Blank was prepared and analyzed following the same procedure, using 100 μL of methanol instead of sample. The radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
where Abs0 was the absorbance of the blank and Abs1 was the absorbance of the sample. The Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity value (TEAC) expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents/gram of dry weight (μmol TE/g of dw) of the samples was calculated from the calibration curve obtained by measuring the absorbance at 517 nm of Trolox methanolic solutions at different concentrations. Three replicates were analyzed for each treatment condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spectroscopic Characterization of Compound 1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on a Bellingham Stanley ADP 400 Polarimeter. UV and IR readings were measured on a PerkinElmer UV-Visible spectrophotometer and a PerkinElmer spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrophotometer, respectively. 1H, 13C, and 2D NMR spectra, including COSY, HSQC and HMBC, were recorded in CDCl3 on a 400 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer using the residual solvent signal (δH 7.26 and δC 77.4) as internal standards. Additional 1D selective NOE and NOESY spectra were obtained on a 600 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer using the residual solvent signal (δH 7.26 and δC 77.4) as internal standards. HPLC isolation and purification of 1 was conducted on a Shimadzu LC-8A preparative LC coupled to a Shimadzu SPD-M10A VP diode array detector. Both HRESIMS data and LC-HRMS/MS analyses were obtained on a Waters Xevo G2-XS qTOF with an ESI positive ion mode and data-dependent acquisition mode. An Agilent 1100 series coupled with an Agilent LC/MSD (Liquid Chromatography/Mass Selective Detector) trap XCT mass spectrometer, equipped with an ESI interface system in negative mode, was used for the detection of the L-Marfey’s-derivatized L/D-valine, proline, N-methylphenylalanine, and alanine moieties from benderamide A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glutaredoxin Activity Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soluble protein was extracted from leaves using method previously described by Fouad and Rathinasabapathi (2006) (link). Grx activity was determined with a coupled enzyme reaction described by Holmgren (1989) (link). In this assay, NADPH-dependent reduction of 2-hydroxyethyl disulfide (HED) in the presence of glutathione reductase (GR) was monitored at 340 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA). The assay mixture contained 100 mg mL-1 of bovine serum albumin, 1 mM GSH, 6 μg mL-1 yeast GR, 0.4 mM NADPH, 0.1 M Tris–HCl, 2 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 8.0, and 0.7 mM HED in a total volume of 800 μL. Non-enzymatic NADPH-dependent reduction of HED was measured for the background. Total protein was estimated by Bradford method. The enzyme activity was expressed as nmol mg-1 protein min-1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DPPH Antioxidant Scavenging Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DPPH radical scavenging ability was measured by modifying the Blois [46 (link)] method. Briefly, 90 μL DPPH solution and 10 μL of the AS-W and AS-E extracts were mixed and then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and absorbance was measured at 515 nm (UV/Visible spectrophotometer, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The experiment was replicated in triplicates and expressed as percentages (%).
DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) = (1 − Absorbance of the sample added group/Absorbance of the non-added group) × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of GZNC Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of powder sample of GZNC was recorded on MiniFlex II benchtop XRD system (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 30 kV and a current of 15 mA with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). The diffracted X-rays were recorded from 20° to 80° at 2θ angles. For the FTIR spectroscopic measurement of GZNC powder was mixed with spectroscopic grade potassium bromide (KBr) in the ratio of 1 : 100 and spectra were recorded in the range of 400–4000 wavenumber (cm−1) on Perkin Elmer FTIR Spectrum BX (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, CT, USA) in the diffuse reflectance mode at a resolution of 4 cm−1 in KBr pellets. The synthesis of GZNC in ethanol solution was monitored by measuring the absorbance (A) using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, CT, USA) in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm. The thermal stability of the GZNC was investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. The microstructure and morphology analyses of sample were done using a JEOL transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEM-2010) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM-6510LV) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ATP Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues from all the groups were cut, ground, and mixed with boiling ddH2O to a final concentration of 10%. The homogenate was then boiled in water for another 10 min. The supernatant was used for the ATP assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China), after centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 15 min. The absorbance values of all samples were analyzed by UV/Visible Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, USA) and the ATP content in the organization was calculated by using the general formula.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Total Polyphenol Content Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of total polyphenols was determined by the colorimetric assay Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) [47 ]. For each reaction, 500 µL of extract were added to 3950 µL of distilled water, 250 µL of F-C reagent (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), and 750 µL of a sodium carbonate saturated solution (Na2CO3). Samples were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was recorded by UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Double beam Perkin Elmer UV/Visible spectrophotometer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at 795 nm. The spectrophotometric results were compared to a pre-made gallic acid standard (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) curve. Total phenolic content was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per 100 g of leaves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Flavonoids in Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of flavonoids was determined by the aluminum chloride method [48 (link)]. Briefly, 500 µL of extract were added to 1500 µL of 95% ethanol, 100 µL of 10% aluminum chloride solution (AlCl3), 100 µL of 1 M potassium acetate solution (CH3CO2K) and 2800 µL of distilled water. The obtained solution was left 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, absorbance was recorded by UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Double beam Perkin Elmer UV/Visible spectrophotometer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) set at 415 nm. Total flavonoid content was calculated in relation to a quercetin standard (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) from a calibration curve and values were expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents (QeE) per 100 g of leaves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!