The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Brightview

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands, Japan, United States

BrightView is a laboratory equipment product from Philips. It is designed to provide high-quality imaging and analysis capabilities for various applications. The core function of BrightView is to capture and process images for scientific and research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using brightview

1

Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging for ATTR-CM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DPD scans were performed by using either a hybrid SPECT/CT gamma camera (BrightView, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) or a SPECT gamma camera (Symbia, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) following the injection of ∼700 MBq DPD.
The imaging protocol involved an early (5 min) and late (3 h) planar whole-body image, with a SPECT/CT or SPECT only scan of the chest at 3 h. If a CT scan was not performed in the same sitting, then a contemporary CT scan of the chest was used for attenuation correction and SUV analysis (n = 9 patients). DPD scans were reported by 2 experienced clinicians using the Perugini grading system (6 (link)), with grade 0 being negative and grades 1 to 3 increasingly positive.
Planar whole-body scans were performed at a scan speed of 20 cm/min; the matrix size was 256 × 1,024 on the Siemens Symbia and 512 × 1,024 on the Philips BrightView. SPECT acquisitions used a contoured orbit with 120 views in a 360° orbit, with 20 s per view and a matrix size of 128 × 128. CT acquisitions of the chest (performed as part of the SPECT/CT imaging) were low dose, ungated, free-breathing, and noncontrast.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dipyridamole-induced Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the myocardial perfusion imaging, patient baseline blood pressure was recorded. Dipyridamole with a dosage of 0.56 mg per kilogram body weight was used to induce the vasodilatation of coronary arteries. With electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, a slow intravenous injection of dipyridamole for 4 min was performed. Four minutes later, 3 mCi of the radioisotope Tl-201 was then injected. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed with an L-shaped, double-headed gamma-camera (BrightView, SPECT Gamma camera, Philips) equipped with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator. The collection conditions were 180-degree arc photography with step capture from the patient′s right anterior oblique (RAO) position to the left posterior oblique (LPO) position (RAO 45 degrees to LPO 45 degrees). The matrix size of each image was 64 × 64, and one set was taken for 60 s to collect 32 plane images. Three to four hours after the stress imaging acquisition, the patients underwent resting imaging with the same acquisition conditions as for the stress imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiac MIBG Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At discharge, all patients underwent myocardial imaging with 123I‐MIBG (MyoMIBG‐I 123 injection; FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) using a conventional rotating gamma camera (BrightView; Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) equipped with a low‐energy type, cardiac high‐resolution collimator. An 111 MBq dose of I‐123 MIBG was injected intravenously at rest after an overnight fast. Initial and delayed image acquisitions were performed in the anterior chest view at 20 and 200 min after isotope injection as previously described.14, 15 A clinician who was unaware of the clinical status of the patients assessed the cardiac MIBG uptake. The MIBG heart‐to‐mediastinum ratio (HMR) was determined by dividing the counts/pixel in a visually drawn heart region of interest by the counts/pixel in an upper mediastinum region of interest. Background subtraction was performed with the upper mediastinal region of interest. After considering the radioactive decay of I‐123, the cardiac MIBG washout rate (WR) was calculated from the initial and delayed images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MPS Assessment of CRT Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were referred for a resting protocol of MPS after at least 12 months of CRT. Under bi-ventricular pacing, ECG-gated MPS was performed using a dual-head SPECT camera (BrightView, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio) 1 h after intravenous injection of 20 mCi of 99mTc-sestamibi. The images were acquired with a step-and-shoot acquisition, 25 s per stop, 32 stops over the 180° orbit, 64 × 64 matrix with 6.4 mm per pixel, and 8-bin gating. The images were reconstructed using standard iterative reconstruction (ordered subsets expectation maximization with 3 iterations and 8 subsets) and Butterworth filtering (cut-off frequency 0.4 cm per cycle and power of 10).
After reconstruction, Emory Cardiac Toolbox with phase analysis was used for generating quantitative parameters, including LVEF, myocardial scar (total areas with myocardial activity < 50% of maximal normalized activity on polar map), phase standard deviation (phase SD), and bandwidth as the previously used protocol.13 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaging Collimator Evaluation for I-123 SPECT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired projections of the background (without a source) and an I-123 capsule source of ~0.2 mCi on a dual-head SPECT/CT system (Philips, BrightView) using three different parallel-hole collimators and a pinhole collimator: LEHR, medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP), high-energy general-purpose (HEGP), and single pinhole (SPH). Table 1 summarizes the specifications of these collimators. The capsule source was placed on the patient table ~10 cm away from the parallel-hole collimator faces and the aperture of the pinhole collimator. The projections of this source were simultaneously acquired using the LEHR/SPH and MEGP/HEGP collimator pairs at 180° mode over 20 minutes. The same acquisition protocol was followed for the background measurements. The energy spectra and projections presented in this work are obtained after the subtraction of the background counts from the corresponding source projections followed by their decay correction. In this way, a total of 7.4, 1.6, 1.0 and 0.78 million counts were collected within the full spectrum for LEHR, MEGP, HEGP, and SPH respectively. The corresponding values within the 15% photopeak energy window (147–171 keV) were 0.95, 0.59, 0.52, and 0.48 million counts, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lymphoscintigraphy of Hand Lymphatic System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lymphoscintigraphy images were obtained at 1 and 2 h after subcutaneous injection of 99mTc-phytate (100 nm, filtered) into the second and/or third web space of both hands with a dose of 37 MBq/0.1 mL per web space. After 99mTc-phytate injection, patients were instructed to exercise (clench and unclench) with rubber balls for 30 min to increase lymphatic flow. Anterior and posterior whole body images were acquired in a 256 × 1024 matrix with the patient in a supine position. One of three different dual-head gamma camera system devices was used: BrightView (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands), Infinia (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA), or Symbia Evo Excel (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), with a low-energy high-resolution parallel whole collimator at a scan speed of 13 cm/minute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Liver Function with 99mTc-GSA Scintigraphy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
99mTc-GSA scintigraphy was performed for all subjects before surgery using PRISM-IRIX (Picker Corp., Cleveland, Ohio, USA/Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) until October 2012 and then BrightView (Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH) thereafter. These were carefully calibrated to obtain the same result when the systems were changed over. All patients received 185 MBq of 99mTc-GSA (3 mg of GSA; Nihon Medi-Physics, Nishinomiya, Japan). After administration, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and dynamic imaging were performed. The scintigraphy requires approximately 40–50 min in total for each patient. There were no apparent contraindications when performing this test. Liver function in 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy included the HH15, LHL15, LU15, and the GSA indices. Of these indices, the LHL15, LU15, and GSA gave higher values with improved liver function, whereas the HH15 showed lower values with improved liver function. Both total liver and FLR of these indices were obtained, except for the HH15. The HH15 can be calculated only for the total liver. The FLR count of 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy was calculated by fusing the 3D computed tomography images and 99mTc-GSA scintigraphy using a volume analyzer system (Synapse Vincent, Fujifilm, Japan). A case of fusion is shown in Fig 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cardiac Amyloidosis Imaging with DPD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DPD scans were performed by using either a hybrid single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT gamma camera (Philips BrightView, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania) or a SPECT gamma camera (Symbia, Siemens Healthineers USA, Malvern, Pennsylvania) following the injection of 700 MBq DPD. The imaging protocol consisted of an early and late (5 min and 3 h, respectively) planar whole-body image, with a SPECT/CT scan or SPECT scan only of the chest at 3 h. DPD scans were reported by 2 experienced clinicians using the Perugini grading system (28 (link)), with grade 0 being negative and grades 1 to 3 increasingly positive. DPD scan findings were independently reviewed by the National Amyloidosis Centre (London, United Kingdom). All patients with a positive DPD scan were discussed with the managing clinicians and, where appropriate, referred to the National Amyloidosis Centre for further review.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!