The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using captiva

1

Analytical Standards Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analytical standards used in this study were >97% purity and purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), or AccuStandard (New Haven, CT). Isotopically labelled internal standards were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA) or Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON) and were >98% purity. Acetonitrile (ACN; LCMS grade) and methanol (MeOH; LCMS grade) were acquired from Honeywell – Burdick & Jackson (Muskegon, MI). Tert-butyl methyl ether (MTBE, HPLC grade) was obtained from ACROS organics (Morris Plains, NJ). Phosphoric acid (85% w/w%) solution (99.99% trace metals basis), formic acid (ACS grade), and ammonium fluoride (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrochloric acid, ammonium hydroxide and sodium phosphate were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH). Double-deionized (DDI, 18.2MOhm*cm) low TOC (<50ppb) water was produced by a Milli-Q® Integral 5 Water Purification System. Solid Phase Extraction cartridges were purchased from Waters (Oasis HLB, 60 um particle size, 500 mg, 6 cc, Milford, MA) and Agilent Technologies (Bond Elut Plexa (45 um particle size, 500 mg, 6 cc, Santa Clara, CA), Bond Elut ENV (45 um particle size, 500 mg, 6 cc, Santa Clara, CA)). PTFE syringe filters were purchased from Agilent Technologies (Captiva, 15mm diameter, 0.2um pore size).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasma Metabolite Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard working solutions were prepared by adding 10 μL of each concentration of the mixed standard solution dilutions in 50 μL purified water (blank matrix). Prepare the standard working solution according to the Plasma Sample Pretreatment. Quality control (QC) samples of the mixed standards at low, medium and high levels were prepared with different vials of standard working solutions. The frozen plasma samples were thawed at 4 °C before analysis. A pooled QC sample was prepared by mixing the same volume (10 μL) of each sample. 10 μL of MeOH solvent and 5 μL of mixed internal standards were added to each tube for the 50 μL plasma samples. Then, 150 μL of acetonitrile (stored at 4 °C; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 5 min on a vortex mixer (IKA, MS) at 2500 rpm and then centrifuged at 10 000 rpm and 4 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and evaporated to dryness in a Doprah A502200 (Xueyu Technology Co. Ltd.). The residues were reconstituted in 50 mL of reconstitution solution (acetonitrile/0.1% aqueous formic acid, 98 : 2, v/v), mixed for 5 min at 2500 rpm on a vortex mixer and then centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatants were filtered with a 96-well plate filter (Captiva, Agilent Technologies, USA) for LC-MS analysis, and 5 μL was injected into the LC-MS/MS system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Succinic Acid and Sugar Consumption Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The succinic acid content in the final samples of the AF trials was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) following the method of Zhu et al. (2020 ). All samples were previously filtered by injecting them through 0.2 μm Captiva filters (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara CA, USA). The chromatograms were analysed using Agilent ChemStation Plus software.
The sugar (glucose + fructose) consumption rate was calculated from the decrease in density (g/cm3 at 20 °C) from 0 to 48 h and converting it to a sugar concentration, following the recommended conversion of OIV (2022 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Analysis of Skin Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried skin was weighted (0.0140 g) and extracted with 200 μL of methanol and 1.4 mL of acetone/water/TFA (70:29.95:0.05). The solution was extracted under sonication for 10 min and stirred at 40 rpm for 20 min, repeated twice. The extraction was carried out at 4 °C in the absence of light and the extract was centrifuged and thermostated at 4 °C, 10,000 rpm, for 10 min. Then, a fraction of 0.5 mL of the supernatant was dried with nitrogen under pressure. At this stage, and unless chromatographic analysis was followed immediately, the samples were stored as concentrates in the deep freezer (−80 °C). The concentrate was redissolved with a mixture of 250 μL methanol and 750 μL water 0.134% formic acid. Subsequently, the solution was led to an ultrasonic device again at 4 °C in the dark for 30 min. The extract was centrifuged and thermostated at 4 °C, for 14,000 rpm, for 15 min, and the supernatant was filtered through 0.22-μm RC syringe filters (RC) (Captiva, Agilent Technologies) prior to chromatography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Amino Acid Profiling of Transfected HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were transfected with MCT7/pEGFP-C1 by using polyethylenimine and cultured for 48 h. The cells were incubated in the Na+-free buffer consisted of 10 mM Hepes/Tris (pH 7.4), 273 mM mannitol, 5.4 mM KCl, 4.2 mM KHCO3, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 0.49 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM MgSO4, 0.34 mM K2HPO4, and 5.6 mM D-glucose for designed time. The amino acid contents of the cells were analyzed by LC-MS/MS system. The cells were scraped with ice-cold distilled deionized water, and the cell suspensions were deproteinated by adding acetonitrile. The samples were passed through a 0.45-μm PVDF filter (Captiva; Agilent Technologies), and the filtrates were used for analysis. The analysis was operated in positive ionization mode using a Waters Acquity UPLC H-Class connected with the Xevo TQD system (Milford). LC separation was performed at a 0.6 ml/min flow rate on an Intrada Amino acid analytical column (50 × 3 mm, 3 μm) (Imtakt). The separation was done by using a gradient program. The gradient program was composed of solvent A (20 mM ammonium formate buffer in water) and solvent B (acetonitrile) as follows: 10% A for 0 to 1.0 min, 10% to 100% A for 1.0 to 2.3 min, 100% A for 2.3 to 2.9 min, and 10% A for 2.9 to 3.8 min. The column temperature was set at 35 °C. Mass Lynx software, version 4.1, software was used to control the instrument and to collect data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isotopically Labeled Internal Standards Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isotopically labeled internal standards were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA) or Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON) and were >98% purity. Solvents and reagents were acquired from Honeywell – Burdick & Jackson (Muskegon, MI), ACROS organics (Morris Plains, NJ), Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), and Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH). Deionized water (> 18 MΩ) was acquired using a Milli-Q® Integral 5 Water Purification System. Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) cartridges (Bond Elut Plexa, 45 μm particle size, 500 mg, 6 cc) and PTFE syringe filters (Captiva, 15 mm diameter, 0.2 μm pore size) were purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA). α-Minimal Essential Medium (α-MEM) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from InVitrogen, phenol red-free Dulbecco’s MEM and 17β-estradiol (E2) from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MI), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) from EMD Chemicals (Burlington, MA), fetal bovine serum (FBS) and charcoal-stripped FBS from Atlanta Biologicals (Atlanta, GA), and L-glutamine and trypsin from Gibco (St. Louis, MI). Luciferin reagent and lysis buffer were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction and Analysis of Bark and Dietary Supplements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five grams of the bark samples (powder or previously pulverised sticks) were sonicated in 20 ml of 80% (v/v) MeOH and fi ltered to a 50 ml volumetric fl ask. The procedure was repeated, fi ltrates were combined, and the fi nal volume was adjusted to 50 ml.
Ten tablets of each dietary supplement were pulverised with mortar and pestle, adequate amounts were weighted (6.7 g for sample S1 and 6.2 g for sample S2) and extracted in the same manner as bark samples. Fifty millilitres of obtained fi ltrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure (Rotavapor RII, Büchi) and redissolved in 5 ml of 80% (v/v) MeOH. Prior to injection, extracts were fi ltered through a 0.45 μm syringe fi lter (Captiva, Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!