The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

30 protocols using ata 27

1

Constructing Tissue Microarray Blocks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were used for construction of TMAs. For epithelioid tumors, six to nine representative tumor areas were marked on H&E-stained slides. For biphasic tumors, six tumor areas were selected from a predominantly morphologic sarcomatoid lesion. Cylindrical 0.6 mm tissue cores were arrayed from the marked areas of corresponding paraffin blocks onto a recipient block using an automated tissue arrayer (ATA-27; Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI); this resulted in five TMA blocks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tissue Microarray Construction from FFPE Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue microarrays were constructed from FFPE tumor samples (tumor and adjacent normal). Cores were precisely arrayed into a new recipient paraffin block using an automated arrayer (ATA-27, Beecher Instruments, Silver Spring, MD) with the method described by Kononen et al32 (link). Documentation for each tissue core’s location was done on a ready-made grid using the program Microsoft Excel. MCF-7 and Hela cells were purchased from ATCC. Cells were allowed to reach semi-confluence, then collected and fixed in 10% neutral formalin for 15 min. Cell blocks were prepared by embedding cells in HistoGel and processing as a piece of tissue, then arrayed into a TMA block as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Microarray Construction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were used for construction of tissue microarrays. For epithelioid tumors, six representative tumor areas and three tumor-related stromal areas were marked on H&E-stained slides. For biphasic and sarcomatoid tumors, six representative areas of sarcomatoid morphologic pattern were marked on H&E-stained slides. Cylindrical 0.6-mm tissue cores were arrayed from the marked areas of corresponding paraffin blocks into a recipient block by use of an automated tissue arrayer (ATA-27; Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA), resulting in five tissue microarray blocks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tissue Microarray Construction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMAs were constructed as previously described14 (link). In brief, three 0.6 mm cores were taken from the tumorous areas and two 0.6 mm cores were taken from the surrounding tumor free liver tissue of each tissue block. The tumorous areas with vital tissue were marked by an experienced pathologist using archived H&E glass slides. The TMAs were made using an automated tissue-arrayer ATA-27 (Beecher Instruments, Silver Springs MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Retrospective Collection of Tissue Samples for TMA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described (Boman et al, 2013b (link)), the tissue from the cohorts (described above) were retrospectively collected for the production of the TMA (cohorts I and II). Representative tissue areas were identified by pathologist, classifying the tumours according to the WHO grading system of 2004 (Sauter et al, 2004 ). In addition, the TMA was constructed using an automated instrument, ATA-27 (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA). All tissue samples were represented in duplicate tissue cores (1 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multi-Tissue Microarray for Cancer Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three 0.6-mm cores were taken from the tumorous area of 133 patients and two
0.6-mm cores were taken from the corresponding TFL tissue of 105 of these
patients. The tumorous as well as the TFL areas with vital tissue were
marked by an experienced pathologist using archived H&E glass slides. In
each TMA we included cores of testis, placenta, tonsil, ovary, stomach,
prostate, bladder, kidney, lung and liver as control tissues. The TMAs were
made using a Beecher automated tissue-arrayer ATA-27 (Beecher Instruments,
Sun Prairie, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Triplicate TMA Analysis of ER+ Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMA was prepared using an ATA 27 (Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA). 408 paraffin‐embedded primary, ER positive breast cancer tissues derived from patients treated with first line tamoxifen upon recurrence were used to prepare the TMA. Tissue cores of 0.6 mm were taken from each tissue paraffin block and transferred in triplicate into a TMA recipient block. For each tumor tissue sample, three different areas of the tumor were taken as biological replicates. TMA slides were digitalized and analyzed using Slidepath software (Leica Microsystems, Solms, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Tissue Microarray Analysis of Breast Cancer Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor cell analysis was conducted via large-core tissue microarray (TMA, OriGene, Rockville, MD, USA). TMA blocks were constructed by extracting 1.5-mm-diameter cylinders from the center of the tumor. A tissue array instrument (Model # ATA-27, Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA) was used to extract tissue cores and arrange them into blank recipient paraffin blocks. The TMA blocks were cut into 4-µm sections and processed for IHC. Antibodies, including ER antibody (dilution 1:50), PR antibody (dilution 1:50), HER2 antibody (dilution 1:50), pCHK2-Thr68 and pCDC25C-Ser216 antibody (dilution 1:40) were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Boston, MA, USA). Immunostaining was performed using the Envision System with diaminobenzidine (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark).
The protein expression of pCHK2-Thr68 and pCDC25C-Ser216 was determined semi-quantitatively by two senior pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological status of the participants. The staining was quantified using visual scoring for the staining intensity (absent, 0; light brown, 1; brown, 2; dark brown, 3) and the extent of staining (percentage of positive tumor cells; ≤10%, 0; 11%–25%, 1; 26%–50%, 2; 51%–75%, 3; >75%, 4). The product of the two scores ranged from 0 to 12. High expression was classified with a score of ≥5 and low expression with a score of ≤4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tissue Microarray Construction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMAs were constructed according to a method previously described (Kononen et al, 1998 ). Representative tumour areas were chosen from haemotoxylin and eosin-stained sections from paraffin blocks and duplicate cores with a diameter of 1 mm tissue were transferred to a recipient block using an automated device (ATA-27; Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Tissue Microarray Construction from Tumor Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously reported by our group,25 (link),26 (link) histologic subtyping of tumors was based on review of H&E slides from the surgical resection specimens. We then used the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens to construction our tissue microarrays. In brief, four to nine representative tumor areas from the most predominant histologic pattern or the second most predominant pattern were marked on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained slides, and cylindrical 0.6-mm tissue cores were arrayed from the corresponding paraffin blocks into a recipient block by an automated tissue arrayer (ATA-27; Beecher Instruments, Sun Prairie, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!