The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using anti cd146

1

Multiparametric Plaque Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD45-positive cells were stained using a suitable antibody (Biolegend). Macrophage content of the atherosclerotic lesion was analyzed using an anti-CD68 antibody (Abcam). Additionally anti-CD146, anti-CD4 (both Abcam), anti-CD8 (Bioss Antibodies), and MPO (R&D Systems) antibodies were used for the differentiation of cell populations within the plaque. ICAM-1 as well as E-selectin (both Biolegend) staining was performed to visualize adhesion molecules on the plaque surface/area. A Zeiss Axio observer microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca Flash (Hamamatsu) was used for fluorescence microscopy, whereas a Zeiss LSM 700 (Carl Zeiss AG) was utilized for broad-field imaging. Tissue sections were automatically analyzed using TissueFAXS (TissueGnostics) and ImageJ (NIH). All analyses were carried out by a blinded member of the study team.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescent Analysis of Periosteal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For additional immunofluorescent staining, either CD146+ periosteal pericytes in culture or cryosections (12–16 μm) of human periosteum, adipose, and intramuscular implants were used. All specimens were blocked with 5% serum in PBS for 1 h at 25 °C. Antigen retrieval was by trypsin enzymatic antigen retrieval solution (Cat# ab970; Abcam) for 5 min. Specimens were incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-CD146 (Abcam, 1:50), anti-CD31 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:320 or Abcam, 1:100), anti-Gli1 (Abcam, 1:100), anti-PDGFRα (Abcam, 1:200), anti-PDGFRβ (Abcam, 1:100), anti-OCN (Abcam, 1:200), and anti-CXCR4 (Abcam, 1:150). The Dylight 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) polyclonal (Vector, 1:200), Goat anti-armenian hamster IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 647 (Abcam, 1:200) or Goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) Alexa Fluor 488 or 647 (Abcam, 1:200) were used as secondary antibodies. Sections were counterstained with DAPI mounting medium (Cat# H-1500, Vector laboratories). All histological sections were examined with a Zeiss 780 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) or microscopy of Leica DM6 B (Leica Microsystems Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin and 3-μm sections were cut and stained for caspase-3, Ki-67 and CD146 using respectively rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-3 (Cell Signaling), anti-Ki67 (Dako), anti-CD146 (Abcam) antibodies. Immunodetection was performed using DAB Substrate-Chromogen (Dako) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Quantification of relative caspase-3 positive surface, Ki-67 positive cells and CD146 immunostaining in tumor tissue were evaluated by ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD) softwares.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction and concentration determination were performed as previously described [7]. Briefly, equal amounts of total protein (30–45 μg) were prepared in 4× Laemmli buffer and heated to 95 °C for 5 min prior to being loaded on SDS‐PAGE gels. After the proteins were separated and transferred to PVDF membranes, the membranes were blocked and subsequently probed with the following antibodies: anti‐phospho‐ERK1/2 (1 : 1000) from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐WNT5A (1 : 100) and anti‐RND3 (1 : 1000) from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA), and anti‐MLC (phospho Ser 20) (1 : 1000), anti‐CD146 (1 : 1000), and anti‐β‐actin (1 : 30 000) from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). After washing, the membranes were incubated with either HRP‐conjugated rabbit anti‐goat secondary antibodies or HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Following a second wash, the separated protein bands were visualized using Immobilon™ Western Chemiluminescence HRP substrate (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and imaged and analyzed using the ChemiDoc™ imaging system (Bio‐Rad Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). Densitometric quantification of relative protein expression was carried out by calculating the intensity of each band using image lab 6.0 software (Bio‐Rad Laboratories Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of hBMSCs with CD146 and Ki-67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1 × 104 hBMSCs were seeded onto 96-well plates and cultured in the presence of amino acids for 48 h in basal medium. The cells were subsequently fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, permeabilized with PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked with 5% normal goat serum (Invitrogen), and then incubated with primary antibody anti-CD146 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-Ki-67 (Abcam) or the respective IgG (Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. Cells were then incubated with secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated IgG (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature, and observed under a fluorescence microscope (BZ-X700, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan). Cell nuclei were stained with 4′6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Invitrogen) [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Endothelial Cell Protein Expression Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVECs were exposed to the EP4 antagonist (AH23848; 100 μM, Sigma, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan) with or without L-902,688 (1 µM) or TGF-β (5 ng/mL) for 24 h. Western blotting was performed using anti-eNOS (BD), anti-E-cadherin (E-cad) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CD146 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-α-SMA (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA), and anti-Twist (Novus, Frauenfeld, Switzerkand) primary antibodies. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling) were administered as secondary antibodies. Blots were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham, UK). Samples were normalized to GAPDH (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and quantified by densitometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotyping of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GMSCs were collected and fixed using 80% methanol. Then primary anti-CD44, anti-CD146 and anti-CD45 antibodies (1 μg/106 cells, Abcam) were used to incubate the cells for 30 min at 4 °C. The samples were incubated using the secondary antibodies of PE goat anti-mouse IgG and goat antirabbit IgG (1 μg/106 cells, Cell Signaling Technology) for one hour in the dark. Flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD Bioscience) was utilized to test the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The third-passage PDLSCs were sub-cultured into six-well plates until confluent. The culture medium was then removed, and cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Zhonghuihecai, Xi’an, CN) for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Zhonghuihecai) for 5 min, and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-pan-cytokeratin, 1:300, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; anti-vimentin, 1:500, Abcam; anti-STRO-1, 1:200, Abcam; anti-CD146, 1:200, Abcam) overnight at 4°C. The cells were then washed with PBS and incubated with CY3/FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500, Zhuangzhi, Xi’an, CN) in darkness for 30 min, and then washed with PBS. Finally, the nuclei were counterstained with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Zhuangzhi), and fluorescent images were captured with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cell Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of proliferation (e.g., transient receptor potential canonical 1, TRPC1), stemness (e.g., CD146), and neuronal differentiation (e.g., Nestin and MAP-2) markers was determined in d-DPSCs cultured in the different media by immunofluorescence staining as described previously (Luo et al., 2018a (link)). At the designated time points after culture, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and incubated for 30 min in a blocking solution containing 5% BSA (Amresco) and 0.1% Triton X-100 (Solarbio) at room temperature. The cells were incubated with the following primary antibodies at 4°C overnight: anti-TRPC1 (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-CD146 (1:200; Abcam), anti-Nestin (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich), and anti-MAP-2 (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich). The secondary antibodies were donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L and donkey anti-mouse IgG H&L (1:500; Abcam). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (Beyotime), and images were taken by fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse 80i; Nikon, Japan). Both the culture of undifferentiated DPSCs in complete α-MEM containing 10% FBS for 6 days and the culture of DPSCs in continuous neuronal differentiation medium for 12 days (the neural-induction group) served as control groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunophenotyping of PDLSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PDLSCs were cultured on 24-well plates with glass coverslips at a density of 105 cells/well overnight. Then, PDLSCs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with anti-CD146 (1:100; Abcam, USA), anti-CD105 (1:100; Abcam, USA), and anti-CD45 (1:200; Abcam, USA) primary antibodies. The samples were then treated with rhodamine/FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Jurkat cells were stained with anti-CD45 antibody as a positive control. The images were captured with a fluorescence microscopy (OLYMPUS, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!