The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistics software 24

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics software 24 is a comprehensive analytical software package designed to efficiently manage and analyze data. It offers a wide range of statistical and data management capabilities, enabling users to effectively explore, visualize, and draw insights from their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

17 protocols using spss statistics software 24

1

Comparative Analysis of CN Ratios

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software 24.
CN ratios were compared between paired tissue samples using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and between the two individual groups using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Differences and correlations were considered significant when p 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prognostic Factors in Radiotherapy Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical data and the expression level assay data were calculated with the IBM SPSS Statistics software 24. Survival status was calculated empirically according to the Kaplan-Meier method and was measured from the day of radiotherapy. Association of the change rate of PDGF-BB with clinical variables was analyzed by the Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed basing on the Cox proportional hazards model. A probability level of P<0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Calculating Fold Change Variability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P-values were calculated as described in the individual Fig legends. The average fold change (FC) in each experiment was calculated using the variable bootstrapping method, measuring the fold change between each potential pair of flies to determine the variability of the mean [12 (link)]. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using one sample t-test of log2FC values to determine the significance of distribution of the mean relative to the null using IBM SPSS Statistics Software 24 [60 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spatial Mapping of CAF Subtypes in ILC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To calculate each cell population, and for visual display (Supplementary Table 3), each cell was classified to one of 18 groups: CK+, CD45+, FAP+, aSMA+, Thy1+, FSP-1+, aSMA+/FAP+, FAP+/Thy1+, FAP+/FSP-1+, aSMA+/Thy1+, aSMA+/FSP-1+, FSP-1+/Thy1+, aSMA+/FAP+/Thy1+, aSMA+/FAP+/FSP-1+, FAP+/FSP-1+/Thy1+, aSMA+/FSP-1+/Thy1+, aSMA+/FAP+/FSP-1+/Thy1+, or “other”. Pericytes are known to express alpha-SMA (39 (link)). To avoid misinterpretation, based on histology, we deselected the areas of blood vessels in the stroma and the selected ROIs were composed only of tumor, tumor stroma interface and stroma (excluding the blood vessels), so that pericytes are not included in the final data. We then generated 19 possible marker expression patterns based on the expression of α-SMA, Thy-1, FAP+, and FSP-1. In our cohort we had equal numbers of two different subsets of ILC (classic ILC vs Pleomorphic ILC). Patterns of distribution according the nearest neighbor distance were calculated for each CAF phenotype to tumor cells using the X and Y coordinates of each cell with Phenoptr script from R studio (Akoya Biosciences). We then compared the proximities of each CAF subtype to the tumor cells between the two histological subtypes of ILC using IBM SPSS statistics software 24.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stress and Lifestyle Behaviors During COVID-19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics (i.e., mean, SD, frequencies, and percentages) were computed to examine the participants’ demographic and behavioral characteristics. Spearman–Brown correlations were computed to examine the associations between stress levels and healthy lifestyle behaviors. We also computed a hierarchical multiple regression analysis with three sequential steps. Step 1 consisted of demographic predictors such as gender, employment status, age, annual income, friends or family tested positive for COVID-19, years in college, and race. In Step 2, we tested whether behaviors such as time spent in physical activity, sitting, sleeping, and connecting with family and friends were significant predictors of stress after controlling for the demographic variables. In Step 3, we examined whether a decrease in the time spent exercising, sleeping, or connecting with friends and family after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic were significant predictors of stress after controlling for the demographic and behavioral characteristics. In each step, the backward procedure was used to eliminate predictors that did not significantly add to the prediction of stress. Significance was based on a value of p ≤ 0.05. We used IBM SPSS statistics software 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) for all statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Factors Affecting Malignant Glaucoma in PACG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics software 24 (International Business Machines Corporation, USA). The numerical variables are described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) while the categorical variables are described as numbers and percentages.
Differences in mean values between young and old PACG eyes were examined using the unpaired t-test. To determine the possible factors affecting the occurrence of malignant glaucoma in young PACG patients, all the variables measured by A-scan and UBM were assessed using univariate logistic regression analysis. Variables with P < 0.1 in univariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Consequently, insignificant factors were removed using a stepwise approach. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Retrospective Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A retrospective descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher's exact test, with Student's t test for continuous variables. All statistical analyses were performed using Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics Software 24. Where possible based on limitations in data availability and skewing, data are represented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Checklist-Based Protocol Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were treated as nonparametric. The items from the checklist answered with 'yes' or 'no' responses were treated as dichotomous variables, a Fisher's exact test was run due to small, expected frequencies (Fleiss, 2003) . Checklist items 6 and 14 answered with a number, as well as the DISCERN, LIDA and FKGL, were treated as continuous variables and analyzed by use of the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Statistical significance was set at p 0.05. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Dunn's (1964) procedure with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, where statistical significance was accepted at the p < 0.0083 level. Scores for DISCERN and LIDA instruments were analyzed for inter-rater reliability using the intra-class correlation (ICC) with a two-way mixed model for absolute agreement, indicating moderate scores for DISCERN (0.73 (95% CI, 0.52-0.86)) and LIDA (0.8 (95% CI, 0.64-0.90)) (McCool, Wahl, Schlecht, & Apfelbacher, 2015; (link)Shrout, 1998) (link). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software 24 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Biomaterial-Induced MSC and Monocyte Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was analyzed in a series of MANOVAs in blocks of responses that were connected, i.e., bone-related gene expression (ALP, BMP-2, COL1A1, RUNX2, OPN and TGF-β), cartilage- or adipose-related gene expression (SOX9 and PPAR-γ), proliferation-related gene expression (KI67, PCNA), death-related gene expression (CASP3, P53), MSC cell numbers (adherent + supernatant cells) and viability, and monocyte cell numbers and viability. In MANOVAs related to MSCs, the model was defined by the factors LPS (with or without), material (PPi0, PPi1, PPi2, PPi3), the condition (CM, CtrM, DEM) and the interaction LPS×condition. In the MANOVA related to the monocytes, only the factors LPS and material were used. Individual factor-level effects were analyzed using estimated marginal means with Bonferroni correction. Further details on MANOVA results and associated complementary ANOVA analyses are found in the Online Resource 1 (Supplementary Table S2). Residual analyses were carried out to check the model assumptions. If the assumption of homoelasticity was doubtful, a sensitivity analysis using bootstrapping was carried out. The data were statistically evaluated in SPSS Statistics software 24.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and a statistical significance level of 5% was used. Bar graphs represent the means ± standard error of the mean (SE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Seasonal Trends in Disease Search

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
By means of paired sample t-tests, mean search activity during winter months was compared to mean search activity during summer months for a 10-year period for each of the aforementioned diseases. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Software 24.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!