The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

53 protocols using 96 pin woundmaker

1

ARPE-19 Cell Wound Healing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ARPE-19 cells were cultured in 96-well ImageLock Microplates (Essen Bioscience Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, United States) to confluence (n = 8), and scratches were made using a 96-pin WoundMakerTM (Essen Bioscience Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, United States). The wells were then washed with PBS to remove cell debris. Wound images were acquired automatically by the IncuCyteTM software system (Essen Bioscience Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, United States). Images were collected at 1-h intervals for the duration of the experiment (72 h). The data were then analyzed via IncuCyte S3 Software (Essen Bioscience Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, United States) using the Relative Wound Confluence integrated metric.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prostate Cancer Cell Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The migration rate of androgen independent prostate cancer cells was assessed using the real-time cell imaging system (IncuCyteTM live-cell ESSEN BioScience Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). A scratch was made using the 96-pin WoundMakerTM (ESSEN BioScience Inc.) in cells growing in 96 well plate. Cell migration was monitored in real time over a period of 14 h, and images were automatically acquired and analyzed using IncuCyteTM 96-well Cell Migration Software Application Module (ESSEN BioScience Inc.). Data is represented as the Relative Wound Density (RWD), which is a representation of the spatial cell density in the wound area relative to the spatial cell density outside of the wound area at every time point (time-curve).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Live-cell Imaging for Cell Proliferation and Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proliferation rates, which were based on cell confluence, were determined by live-cell imaging (IncuCyte ZOOM System, Essen BioScience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), as described previously [32 (link)]. To analyze cell migration, the cells were cultured in 96-well ImageLock Plates (Essen BioScience) to reach confluence prior to wound creation. A scratch was made in confluent monolayers while using a 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen BioScience, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The cells were washed with PBS and then incubated using the IncuCyte ZOOM System. Cell migration was analyzed at 2 h intervals throughout the duration of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scratch Wound Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The effect of treatment on cell migration was assessed in a scratch−wound assay using the IncuCyte® Zoom Kinetic Imaging System (Essen BioScience, USA). UW-CSCC1 and UW-CSCC2 were seeded (n = 10) onto collagen 1−coated 96−well ImageLock plates (Essen BioScience, USA) and grown to near confluency in their respective growth media. To prevent proliferation and isolate migratory effects, cells were serum−starved prior to investigation of their motility. This was achieved by replacing media in the wells with a 1% FCS analogue of the relevant growth factor−free culture media. After 24 h incubation in this low serum containing media, the cells were scratched according to manufacturer’s instructions using the 96−pin Woundmaker™ (Essen BioScience, USA). The cells were subsequently washed with serum−free media, then incubated in low serum media containing at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and imaged over 48 h at ×10 objective to track cell motility and wound width. IncuCyte™ ZOOM software (Essent BioScience, USA) was used to interpret wound width reduction over time. Output was analysed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, USA), applying a one−way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple−comparison post−test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fibroblast Scratch Wound Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) (2 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates (Essen Bioscience, Newark, United Kingdom). Once fibroblast reached confluence, a scratch was made using the 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen Bioscience). Then, cell media was replaced by fresh serum-free DMEM supplemented with 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin. At that point, CBD treatments were added in combination with either TGFβ1 or rhIL-4 (10 ng/ml) to induce cell proliferation. Images were taken every 3 h for 48 h, and data analysed using IncuCyte HD software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Migration Evaluation: Wound Healing and Transwell Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration was evaluated with wound-healing and transwell assay. For the wound-healing assay, cells (3×104cells/well) were seeded into 96-well culture plates (Corning-Costar, NY, USA). When cells reached >90% confluence, at 12 hours after seeding, wound scratches were made by a 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen BioScience), and relative wound densities were measured by the IncuCyte Zoom system over a 2-day period. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
In transwell chamber migration and invasion assays, 3×104 cells were put into each chamber, providing with serum-free medium, and permitted to pass through a polycarbonate filter, which had been either precoated by 100 μg Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) for the invasion assay or left uncoated for the migration assay. The outside of chambers was filled with DMEM, containing 10% FBS. Cells on the upper surface of the filters were erased after 24 hours (SGC-7901) or 48 hours (HGC-27, BGC-823 and MGC-803) in migration assays. Cells on the upper surface of the filters were erased after 48 hours (SGC-7901) or 72 hours (HGC-27, BGC-823 and MGC-803) in invasion assays. The membranes were fixed with methanol for 15 minutes and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 15 minutes. The cells on the underside of the filter were photographed and counted in five randomly selected microscopic views.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wound Healing Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The modulation of cell migration was analyzed by wound-healing assays. Briefly, NHDFs were seeded in a 96-well Essen ImageLock plate (Essen BioScience) and were grown to confluence. After 24 h, the scratches were made using the 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen BioScience), followed by incubation of the cultures in media with 10 ng/ml of mitomycin C to block cell proliferation. VCE-004.8 and TGFβ1 or rhIL-4 (10 ng/ml) were added and wound images were taken every 60 min for 36 h, and the data analyzed by the integrated metric Relative Wound Density part of the live content cell imaging system IncuCyte HD (Essen BioScience).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scratch Wound Assay with Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated (40,000 cells/well) on a 96-well Essen ImageLock plate. Adherent cells were serum-starved for 16 h and a scratch wound was made using a 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen Bioscience), then treated as described. Wound images were taken every 4 h for 24 h and the relative wound confluency was calculated at each time point. When indicated, cells were pretreated with vehicle (DMSO), 1μM Lapatinib for 12 h or 1 μM ANA-12 for 2 h prior to scratch wound. Treatments were performed in 5-replicates in at least two independent experiments. For invasion assays, cells were treated as above, but wounds were filled with matrigel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PLXND1 Regulation of Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scratch would healing assay, HUVECs transfected for 48 hrs with control or Plxnd1-targeting siRNAs were seeded in 96-well plate at 50,000 cells/well in complete EBM-2 media. After 24 hrs, the cell monolayer was scratched with a 96-pin Wound Maker (IncuCyte, Essen Bioscience). Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated for 18 hrs in complete MN media with or without recombinant Sema3C-Fc (500 ng/ml; R&D Systems Cat# 5570-S3). The wound area was imaged every 15 min using the IncuCyte Zoom system and the rate of gap closure was quantified automatically with IncuCyte Analysis Software by measuring the relative wound confluence at each time point. For cell proliferation assay, 30,000-40,000 control or Plxnd1 knockdown HUVECs were seeded in 24-well plate containing either complete EBM-2 media or MN media, let recover for 1 hr and imaged with IncuCyte system for 36 hrs to automatically measure cell growth rates based on normalized confluence area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scratch Wound Assay with Matrigel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated (35,000 cells/well) in 5% Charcoal Stripped FBS in regular media, on 96-well Essen ImageLock plates. Adherent cells were serum-starved for 6 hours and a scratch wound was made using a 96-pin WoundMaker (Essen Bioscience), and wounds were filled with Matrigel Growth Factor Reduced (GFR) Basement Membrane Matrix (Corning). Wound images were taken every 4 hours for 24 hours and the relative wound confluency was calculated at each time point using an IncuCyte S3 System (Essen BioScience). When indicated, cells were pretreated with doxycycline (1 μg/mL) for 48 hours before scratch wound and during assay. Treatments were performed in 6-replicates, and each experiment repeated at least twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!