The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using calibrated digital scale

1

Infant Weight Gain Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Birth weight was measured using calibrated digital scales (Seca, UK). The 2-year assessment was performed by a research nurse during a home visit, in which weight was measured using calibrated digital scales (Seca Ltd, UK). Infant weight gain was calculated by subtracting birth weight from weight at 2 years.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric Measures and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight (kg) was measured without shoes using a calibrated digital scale (SECA GmbH & Co. KG). Two measures were recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg, and a third measure was obtained if the first and the second measures differed by > 0.2 kg. The average of the measures was reported.
Body height (cm) was measured without shoes using an automatic weighing scale (SECA GmbH & Co. KG). Two measures were recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm, and a third measure was obtained if the first and the second measures differed by > 1.0 cm. The average of the measures was reported.
Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters squared) and categorized based on the Asian cut-off points (underweight: < 18.5 kg/m2; normal weight: 18.5-22.9 kg/m2; overweight: 23.0-24.9 kg/m2; pre-obese: 25.0-29.9 kg/m2, and obese: ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) (18 (link)). Body fat mass (kg) and lean body mass (kg) were assessed using a bioimpedance analysis instrument (SFB7, ImpediMed Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized Smartphone-Based Body Composition Scanning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our procedures for visual body composition scanning have been previously reported(19 (link)) but are summarised below. Participants reported to the laboratory after abstention from food, beverages, supplements/medication and exercise for ≥ 8 h. Upon arrival participants were asked to remove any external accessories (jewelry, shoes, etc.) and/or loose clothing and underwent measurements of height collected by a digital stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany), weight collected by a calibrated digital scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) and WC and HC collected using an aluminum tape measure. Following tape measurements, participants were lead to a specific area of the laboratory to complete the smartphone-based assessments. For scanning on each mobile application, participants were instructed to wear minimal form-fitting clothing. For example, female participants were instructed to wear a sports bra and tight-fitting shorts/leggings, and male participants were instructed to wear compression shorts/tights only. Higher waisted shorts that covered the participants bellybutton were altered to expose the participants entire abdominal region to the smartphone camera. Participants with long hair were instructed to tie their hair up so that no hair was present below the shoulder line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty one subjects met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Weight measurement was done using a calibrated digital scale (Seca gmbh & co. kg. Germany). A stadiometer (Seca gmbh & co. kg. Germany) calibrated before each measurement, was used for height measurement. Abdominal and hip circumferences were assessed by a trained nurse, using a cloth tape. The waist was defined at the midpoint between the highest point of the iliac crest and the lowest part of the costal margin in the midaxillary line, and the hip was measured at the level of the greater femoral trochanters. These measurements were used for calculating the body mass index (BMI), and the waist to hip ratio (WHR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anthropometric and Blood Pressure Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nurses measured height by a tape meter (Seca, Germany) while patients stood with heads and heels touching the wall surface without shoes. Weight was measured by a calibrated digital scale (Seca, Germany) without heavy clothes or shoes. Blood pressure was measured when participants were comfortable with their right hand at heart level using an automated oscillometric device (Glamor, Germany). Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg or higher, diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or higher, or routine use of antihypertensive medications. WC was measured by wrapping a tape meter around patients’ waist, in the middle line between anterior superior iliac spine and the last rib, after they breathed out [8 (link)], and HC was determined by measuring around the largest part of buttocks. Body surface area (BSA) was calculated by Dubois formula: BSA = 0.20247 [weight 0.425 × (height/100)0.725] [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Anthropometric Measurements in Growth Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight was measured using a calibrated digital scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height was measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer (Holtain, Crosswell, UK) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was determined by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters. Height velocity was calculated as the amount of growth in centimeters divided by the time interval between measurements in years. All values were expressed in z-scores [41 (link),42 ]. Pubertal stage was assessed according to Tanner score [43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Anthropometric Measurements for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured using a digital stadiometer (SECA 769, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest tenth (cm) and weight using a calibrated digital scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest hundredth (kg). Body composition estimates including body fat percent (BF%), fat mass (FM), and fat-free mass (FFM) were collected using DXA (Lunar iDXA, General Electric, Boston, MA, USA) with version 18 enCORE software and used to describe our sample and verify similar body composition components between groups. Participants were positioned on the DXA according to recommended guidelines and reflection scanning techniques were used for larger participants who were unable to fit within the DXA scanning dimensions. [28 (link),29 (link)] WC was collected at the level of the superior iliac crest and HC was collected at the widest lateral portion of the hip using a flexible aluminum tape measure. WC and HC were collected in duplicate and averaged to produce a final estimate (TEM: 0.43 cm). Further reliability metrics from our laboratory can be found elsewhere. [30 (link)] Waist-to-hip ratio was calculated as the average WC divided by the average HC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Anthropometric Measurements Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm in duplicate using a wall mounted stadiometer. Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated digital scale (Seca, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Body mass was measured twice a week during weight maintenance and energy restriction to monitor study diet compliance and track weight loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Baseline Demographic and Anthropometric Measures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baseline demographic characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, education, household income, smoking status, and age at menarche were obtained through self-report by the participants at enrollment. Female participants were also asked if they had regular menstrual cycles at the time of the baseline visit (regular versus irregular), and their amount of weekly aerobic physical activity (<30 minutes; 30–59 minutes; 1–2 hours; ≥3 hours). Dietary covariates (e.g., energy, caffeine and alcohol) were estimated from the average of the dietary recalls. In addition, participants were weighed (within 0.1 kg) without shoes and wearing only light clothing on a calibrated, digital scale (SECA, Chino, CA). Standing height was measured without shoes (within 0.5 cm) on a wall-mounted stadiometer. All measurements were taken twice and averaged. If the first two measurements disagreed (>0.5 cm for height or >0.2 kg for weight), a third measurement was taken and the two closest were averaged and recorded. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each participant [weight (kg)/height (m)2].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Longitudinal Bone Health Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 6 and 8 years of age, children were invited for a repeat DXA assessment. The child’s height, using a Leicester height measurer (Seca, Birmingham, UK), and weight, using calibrated digital scales (Seca, Birmingham, UK) were measured. The child’s age at the time of DXA assessment was also recorded. A Hologic Discovery scanner (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) was used in paediatric scan mode. To encourage compliance children were shown an age-appropriate DVD and a bright sheet with appropriate pictures was laid on the couch. Whole body scans were obtained, generating data on bone indices. Coefficients of variation for this instrument for whole body BMD were 0.75%. DXA scans were reviewed and those with excessive movement or clothing artefacts were omitted from the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!