The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using crl cd1

1

Establishing Outbred Mouse Microbiome Colonies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We also sought to establish colonies of outbred mice harboring distinct complex microbiota that is naturally occurring in contemporary rodent producers. Doing so would facilitate future CMTR studies as outbred mice have greatly improved reproductive indices. To this end, 8–10 week old female C57BL/6J (The Jackson Laboratory), C57BL/6NTac (Taconic Biosciences, Inc.), and Crl:CD1 (Charles River Laboratories) mice were purchased and allowed to acclimate for 1 week prior to use. Embryos were harvested from 8 week old Crl:CD1 (Charles River Laboratories) mice and implanted into recipient C57BL/6J (The Jackson Laboratory), C57BL/6NTac (Taconic Biosciences, Inc.), and Crl:CD1 (Charles River Laboratories) mice as previously described section Embryo Collection and Transfer. Offspring from surrogate dams were mated using an outbred mating scheme and individual colonies with targeted GM were maintained for two generations. Second generation 8–10 week old females were used for rederivation of B6.129P2-Il10tm1Cgn/J (B6 IL-10−/−) mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Embryo Transfer Protocol for Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For embryo transfer (ET) recipients, 8–10 week old female C57BL/6J (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME), C57BL/6NTac (Taconic Biosciences, Inc., Cambridge, IN facilities), and Crl:CD1 (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) mice were purchased and allowed to acclimate for 1 week prior to use. Embryos from 8 week-old female B6.129P2-Il10tm1Cgn/J (B6 IL-10−/−) and C3Bir.129P2(B6)-Il10tm1Cgn/J (C3H IL-10−/−; The Jackson Laboratory) mice were harvested from colonies maintained on site. Vasectomized, 8–10 week old Crl:CD1 male mice (Charles River Laboratories) were co-housed to induce pseudopregnancy and intrauterine embryo transfer was performed (see section Embryo Collection and Transfer). All mice were housed in microisolator cages on ventilated racks (Thoren, Hazelton, PA) on a 14:10 light dark cycle, and provided ad libitum access to 5,058 irradiated breeder chow (LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) and acidified autoclaved water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Behavioral Evaluation of Adult Male CD-1 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult (8–10 weeks, 25–43 g) male CD-1 mice, bred in-house at the University of Bath for more than 10 years (originally from Charles River Crl:CD1(ICR)), were housed in groups of 4 to 5. In the homecages (30 × 16 × 14 cm), mice were provided with wood shavings and nesting material with ad libitum access to food and water. Mice were maintained on a 12:12 hours light–dark cycle (lights on 07:00 h; lights off 19:00 h) at 20 ± 2°C. All experiments were performed in accordance with the UK Home Office guidelines and the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. For all behavioural tasks animals were habituated to the behavioural room for one hour prior to the experiment beginning. Separate groups of animals, n=5-10 per treatment group, were used for each behavioural task. All behavioural experiments were performed between 9:00-16:00 h and mice were acclimatized to the behavioural room for 1h prior to starting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mouse Model Comparison for Biomedical Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female BALB/c mice (BALB/cAnNCrl, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 18 ± 1 g)), female CD-1 mice (Crl:CD-1, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 27 ± 1 g)), and female NMRI mice (Crl:NMRI, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 20 ± 1 g)) were obtained from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany, or Raleigh, NC, USA). Female and male C57/BL/6 mice (C57/BL/6J, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 20 ± 1 g)), female and male TRPV1−/− mice (B6.129X1-Trpv1tm1Jul/J, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 20 ± 1 g)) and female and male TRPA1−/− mice (B6;129P-Trpa1tm1Kykw/J, (7 ± 1 weeks old, body weight 20 ± 1 g)) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All animals were kept in groups of four or six mice per cage with a 12 h light/dark cycle at 22 °C. Water and a standard diet (Altromin 1824/LabDiet 5001) were provided ad libitum. The animal experiments have been ethically approved by the LAVES institute, Oldenburg, Germany (AZ 33.12-42502-04-16/2213, approval date: 28.09.16) and by the North Carolina State University Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol No. 16-154-B and 16-038-B (1)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CD-1 Mouse Care and Ethics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 to 6 day old CD-1 mice (Crl:CD1, Charles River Laboratories) of both genders were used in all experiments in accordance with the rules of the ethics committee at the University of Graz and the corresponding animal protocol, which has been approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research Ref. II/10b. Mice were housed with food and water ad libitum and monitored under the care of full-time staff.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Mouse Hematology and Genetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RBCs and CBC2s were counted in C57BL/6J (hereafter B6/J) and A/J mice, and in 26 genetically distinct recombinant inbred (RI) strains derived from them comprising the AXB/BXA strain set. The cell count data from these mice have previously been reported in an on-line appendix (Keeley et al., 2014b (link)), while a more extensive study has recently reported the cell counts and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for the RBC population (Kautzman et al., 2018 (link)); the methodology associated with these analyses is briefly recapitulated below. Eyes from Xkr8 knockout mice (KO) and heterozygous (Het) littermate control mice (wild type littermate controls were not available) were provided by the laboratory of Dr. Shigekazu Nagata at Osaka University in Japan (Suzuki et al., 2013 (link)). Electroporation experiments were conducted on CD1 mice originally obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Crl:CD1, #022), and subsequently bred in the UCSB Animal Resource Center. B6/J and A/J mice were also bred in-house, and used for in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence and qPCR studies. All experiments were carried out under authorization by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at UCSB, and in accord with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Generation of Ildr2 Floxed Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate Ildr2 floxed mice (Ildr2fl/fl), a targeting construct containing Ildr2 exon 1 flanked by loxP sites and a neomycin resistance cassette (transcribed in opposite direction of gene, 1.6 kb from exon 1) was electroporated into V6.5 (129 x B6 F1) ESCs. Electroporated ESCs were selected with G418, picked, and 384 colonies were clonally expanded. Positive integration of the targeting construct was identified by PCR followed by confirmation of correct integration by Southern blot. A positive clone was injected into E3.5 BDF1 blastocytes and transferred into the uteri of pseudopregnant CD1 mice (Crl:CD1; Charles River). Floxed alleles in the pups were confirmed by PCR. Chimeric mice were crossed with C57BL/6J (Jackson Labs) mice and offspring were confirmed carriers by PCR and Southern blot analysis. Mice that carried the floxed allele were backcrossed to C57BL/6J mice (obtained from Jackson Labs) for 10 generations then intercrossed to create B6.129S-Ildr2fl/fl mice. These mice were bred with albumin-Cre mice (B6.Cg-Tg(Alb-cre)21Mgn/J, Jackson Labs stock #003574) until all offspring segregated for two floxed alleles and one or no copies of Cre.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!