The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

138 protocols using icp ms

1

Racial Differences in Urinary Arsenic Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a subset of 310 participants, we measured baseline urinary metal concentrations including iAs and performed arsenic speciation at the Trace Element Laboratory of the University of Graz, Austria. The participants were chosen from the MESA study using a random site and race/ethnicity stratification to provide predetermined distribution by site and race, resulting in 90 White, 75 Black, 75 Hispanic, and 70 Chinese American participants. Spot urine samples were collected in the morning of the baseline exam in 2000–2002. Urinary arsenic was measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) using standard protocol [43 (link)]. Arsenic speciation was measured using anion-exchange high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to ICPMS [43 (link)]. All arsenic concentrations were corrected for urine dilution using specific gravity [44 (link),45 (link)]. When measurements were below the level of detection (LOD) of 0.10 μg/L, values were replaced with LOD/√2. A total of 133 samples were below the LOD for iAs (46.0%) and 40 samples were below the LOD for MMA (13.8%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Cu2+ in Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cu2+ concentration in the cell culture medium was quantified by inductively coupled plasma - mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS, Varian, Darmstadt, Germany) against standard solutions of 50 and 100 µg/l.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Mg Scaffold Biomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the surface and cross section of different scaffolds were observed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Gemini 2, Zeiss). The diameter distribution of Mg microspheres was analysed by ImageJ software based on the SEM images. The surface functional groups were identified using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, TENSOR 27, Bruker). The chemical components of the scaffolds were characterized by TGA (Q500, TA) and XRD (D8 Advance, Bruker). The contact angle was measured by a contact angle meter (DSA100E, KRUSS). The 200 mg scaffold was immersed in 2 ml of deionized water and incubated on a shaker at 80 rpm and 37 ℃. The concentrations of Mg2+ released from the scaffold at 3, 9, 15 and 21 days were measured using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICPMS, Varian, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Ion Release from 3D Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The release profile of magnesium, phosphorous and strontium ions from the 3D-printed scaffolds was recorded utilizing Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS, Varian, Darmstadt, Germany) during 21 days. Samples (disc shape with a diameter of 10 mm and thickness of 3 mm) were immersed in 5 ml Mili-Q water and 0.1M Tris-HCl (Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) at 37 °C. To quantify the concentration of released ions, the solutions were 10X diluted in 1.3 v/v% HNO3 (65% Suprapur, Merck, Schwalbach, Germany) and measured against standard solutions (Merck, Schwalbach, Germany, Ca2+: 0.5 ppm and 1 ppm, Mg2+: 1 ppm, 5 ppm, P-: 100 ppm and 500 ppm, Sr2+: 10 ppm and 200 ppm). The ion concentrations at each timepoint were calculated relative to the amount of fresh medium and the cumulative concentration of released ions was reported over 21 days. To compare the ion release of MgPSr-PCL30, the MgP-PCL30 scaffolds were used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cellular Uptake of G4@IONPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular uptake of G4@IONPs was evaluated by Prussian blue staining and measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) [38 (link),39 (link)]. Different concentrations of G4@IONPs (500, 250, 100, 50, and 0 (control) μg/mL) were added to cell culture media. After 2 h incubation, cells were fixed with 4% formalin and incubated with 4% potassium ferrocyanide and 4% hydrochloric acid (50%, v/v) for 20 min. Finally, the G4@IONPs cellular localization was observed by optical microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Furthermore, MC4L2 cells were trypsinized after 2 h incubation with G4@IONPs (500, 250, 100, 50, and 0 (control) μg/mL) and lysed by 2 mL 65% nitric acid; the quantity of cellular uptake of G4@IONPs was assessed using ICP-MS (Varian Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA). To obtain the iron concentration per cell, the total iron concentration measured by ICP-MS was divided by the number of lysed cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Prussian Blue Staining for Iron Detection in MCF7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Prussian blue staining, used to detect the presence of iron, MCF7 cells were incubated in a medium containing G4@IONPs (500 µg/ml) for 2 h. Subsequently, cells were fixed with 4% formalin at room temperature for 20 min and washed with PBS, followed by the incubation with 10% potassium ferrocyanide in 10% HCl (50%, v/v) for 20 min (Samanta et al. 2008 (link)). MCF7 cells after 2 h incubation with 500, 250, 100, 50, and 0 (control) μg/ml G4@IONPs were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation. The collected cells were lysed by 2 ml 65% nitric acid. The amount of the nanoparticles cell uptake was quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Varian Inc, Palo Alto, CA) and the resulting concentration was divided by counting the cell numbers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Anaerobic Digestion Byproducts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw slurry and the different fractions obtained
(i.e., S1–S8) were sampled three times over six months of the
observation period (January – Winter, May – Spring,
and July – Summer of 2021). During each sampling event, homogenized
samples (2000 mL each divided in four samples) were collected from
the different separation stages at noon. The samples were collected
in polyethylene sampling containers and transported within 2 h from
the facility to the laboratory in cooler boxes filled with ice. Samples
were stored at 4 °C. Each sample was tested in triplicate.
The following parameters were measured: dry matter at 105 °C
(DM 105 °C), dry matter at 600 °C (DM 600 °C),27 and total Kjeldhal nitrogen (TKN) (EN 13652);28 ammonia-N (NH4-N) (ISO 5664 method);29 nutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mo, Mn), heavy
metals (Cd, Cr tot, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn, Hg, Al), and microelements (As,
Co, Se) according to DIN EN ISO 1188530 and UNI-EN 16174.31 Elemental analyses
were carried out by using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
(ICP-MS, Varian Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Chemical Characterization of Digestate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ingestate, digestate and ammonium sulphate, if not better specified in tables, were sampled during a period of 42 months (from January 2017 to June 2020) and characterized from a chemical point of view according, also, (digestate) to Lombardy Region regulation (Regione Lombardia, 2019) for agricultural use of these products.
The following parameters were determined: pH (EPA 9045D) (EPA, 2004) , dry matter at 105°C (DM 105°C), dry matter at 600°C (DM 600°C) and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (APHA, 1998), total nitrogen (TKN) (EN 13652) (EN 2001) . Ammonia-N (NH4-N) was determined by ISO 5664 method (ISO, 1984) (reagent and grade in Table S1).
In addition, nutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mo, Mn), heavy metals contents (Cd, Cr tot, Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn), and micropollutants/element (Hg, As, Al, Co, Se, Na) were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Varian Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA) according to DIN EN ISO 11885 (ISO, 2009) (Ca, Mn, Mg, Fe, Mo, Al, Co, Na) , and according to UNI-EN 16174 (UNI-EN, 2012) for all the other elements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Anaerobic Digestion Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ingestates, digestates, liquid fractions of digestates and solid fractions of digestates were sampled from six mesophilic full-scale anaerobic digestion plants located in the Lombardy Region (North Italy). Plants were characterized by different hydraulic retention times (HRT) and feed-stock mixtures (Table 1). The samples taken were stored in 2 litre PTFE bottles without headspace before chemical characterization.
On fresh samples, the Total N-Kjeldahl (TKN) and ammonia (TAN) were analysed according to the analytical method established for wastewater sludge (APHA 1998) as well as pH (US Department of Agriculture and US Composting Council, 2002) . Total solids (TS) and volatile solids (VS) were determined following standard procedures (APHA, 1998) . On dry samples, total P and K contents were quantified, after acid digestion (EPA, 1998) , by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS by Varian, Fort Collins, USA); standard samples (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and blanks were run with all samples to ensure precision in the analyses. All the sampling and the analyses were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Ion Concentration Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ion concentrations (Ca2+, P as PO43-, Cr3+) in the cell culture supernatants and in cement extracts were determined using inductively-coupled-plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS, Varian, Germany). The quantitative measurement was carried out against standard solutions (Merck) containing defined concentrations of all ions of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!