The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Impact 2

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany, United States, Japan

The Impact II is a high-performance mass spectrometer designed for a wide range of analytical applications. It features a robust and reliable ion source, advanced mass analyzer technology, and high-sensitivity detection. The core function of the Impact II is to provide accurate and precise mass measurements for the identification and quantification of various compounds in complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

78 protocols using impact 2

1

Mapping BspE Hydrolytic Specificity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Screening with several peptides (H2686, glycodrosocin, MOG) and the protein Apo-myoglobulin was performed to identify any preferential sites for BspE hydrolytic activity. Peptides were incubated overnight with BspE in PBS at 37°C. Fragments were separated through LC (Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity) (C18) and analyzed by MS/MS (Bruker Impact II). Enzymatic cleavage sites were mapped using the software Bruker Compass Data Analysis 4.4 and BioPharma Compass 2.0. Preference of amino acids was calculated based on number of cleavages divided by total sum of the area under the peak for said amino acids (e.g., the possible differences in ability to fly for the peptides could not be considered). The precise specificity may however be biased due to the use of peptides with a high prevalence of certain amino acids. Further, due to the inability to measure exact quantities of hydrolytic peptide fragments by using mass spectrometry (e.g., not being able to consider differences in ability to fly of the peptide fragments by lack of heavy peptides), the precise order of the measured specificity may be slightly affected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of ASBDs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ASBDs (Figure 1) were synthesized in the Department of Organic Chemistry at the Medical University of Silesia in Sosnowiec, as previously described [25 (link)]. The reaction of Bet with propynoic acid was carried by the Steglich method to give 28-O-propynoylbetulin (EB5). Bet was converted to the 28-O-propargyloxycarbonylbetulin (EB25/1) by esterification with propargyl chloroformate with the presence of pyridine in benzene (Figure 7. Both ASBDs were purified using gel column chromatography. The structures of ASBDs were determined on the basis of their 1H- and 13C-NMR (Bruker AVANCE III HD 600, Billerica, MA, USA, deuterated chloroform), IR (IRAffinity-1 FTIR spectrometer; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan, KBr pellet), and MS spectra (Bruker Impact II, Billerica, MA, USA). The 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data for ASBDs were consistent with the literature values (Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were purchased from commercial sources and were used as received unless mentioned otherwise. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC). 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (101 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 spectrometer. Chemical shifts reported in parts per million (ppm) referred to tetramethylsilane (0.00 ppm) or residues of CDCl3 (7.26 ppm). Data are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet), coupling constants (Hz) and integration. Mass spectra (HRMS) were collected on a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Impact II, Bremen, Germany). Melting points were obtained on a SGW X-4 melting point apparatus. All solvents used were distilled with standard techniques. Single crystal was recorded on a Gemini E diffractometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography-grade methanol and acetonitrile were procured from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China). High-performance liquid chromatography-grade dichloromethane and dichloromethane-d2 were purchased from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China) and Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA, USA), respectively. The 2,3′-bisindolylmethanes (compounds 1–4 shown in Scheme 1) were obtained from Guo's laboratory.16 (link) MS experiments were performed on a quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Impact II, Bremen, Germany). The mass resolution was about 59 500 FWHM (full width at half maximum) at 1222 u. High-purity nitrogen was used as the nebulizer, dry gas and collision gas. The conditions of ESI source in positive-ion mode were as follows: capillary voltage, 4500 V; end plate offset, 500 V; nebulizer, 0.4 bar; dry gas, 4.0 L min−1 and the dry gas temperature, 180 °C. The sample solution was introduced at a rate of 180 μL h−1 by a peristaltic pump. The mass data were processed by Bruker Compass Data Analysis 4.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of HSCCC Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each purified fraction from the HSCCC separation was analyzed by HPLC using a Waters C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at 210 and 254 nm. The HPLC system was composed of a Waters 2695 pump, Waters 2695 controller and Waters photodiode array detector (Waters, USA). Evaluation and quantification were performed using an Empower Pro Data System (Waters, USA). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and water (B). The flow rate was kept constant at 1.0 mL min−1 for a total run time of 30 min. The gradient elution program was carried out as follows: 0–20 min, 15% A to 25% A; and 20–30 min, 25% A to 35% A.
Identification of the peak fractions was carried out via HRESI-MS and NMR spectroscopy on a Bruker Impact II (Bruker Daltonics Inc., USA) and Varian-600 spectrometer (Varian, CA, USA, using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Untargeted Metabolite Analysis Using UHPLC-QTOF-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The untargeted analysis was performed using a Bruker Elute UHPLC system with Hystar 3.3 software and an ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometer Bruker Impact II (60,000 + resolution version; Bruker Daltonik GmbH) ESI QTOF-MS with Data Analysis 4.2 (Bruker Daltonik GmbH) and Metaboscape (ver. 2022b). Metabolite separation was achieved with a gradient of mobile phases using a Waters UPLC column ACQUITY BEH (C18 silica, 1.7 μm particles, 50 × 2.1 mm) with a compatible column guard was used for all analyses. Further details are described in our previous publication35 (link) and supplementary information 1 (section S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Compound Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses were performed by direct injection of methanol solutions of isolated fractions using electrospray ion source in a positive mode and high-resolution tandem mass spectrometer Bruker Impact II (Bremen, Germany), equipped with an and quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyzer (ESI-QTOF). The obtained m/z data were fitted to molecular formula using ChemCalc software (https://www.chemcalc.org) and the following atom composition range C0-100 H0-200 O0-20 Na1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each sample was analyzed on a Bruker Impact II (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) connected to a Dionex UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The UHPLC was equipped with a trap column (Acclaim PepMap 100, 75 μm × 2 cm, nanoviper, C18, 3 μm, 100 Å; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an analytical column (PepMap RSLC C18, 2 μm, 100 Å, 75 μm × 50 cm; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mobile‐phase buffers for nLC separation consisted of 5% ACN/0.1% FA in water (solvent A) and 95% ACN/0.1% FA (solvent B). The peptides were eluted during a 2 h gradient and directly sprayed into the mass spectrometer. The flow rate was set at 400 nl/min, and the LC gradient was as follows: 4% solvent B within 5 min, 4–32% solvent B within 90 min, 32–95% solvent B within 1 min, 100% B for 10 min and down to 2% solvent B within 1 min following equilibration at 2% solvent B for 13 min. Nano spray was achieved with an applied voltage of 1.6 kV using a Captive Spray source (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) connected to a NanoBooster filled with 100% ACN. The mass spectrometer was programmed in a data‐dependent acquisition mode (cycle time set to 3 s) and was configured to perform a survey scan from 150 to 2200 m/z (1 Hz). MS2 scans were acquired in dynamic mode (2500 cts = 8 Hz to 25,000 cts = 32 Hz) of ions with charge state between 2 and 5 with a smart exclusion (5×) set to 30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proteomic Analysis of A. zaruma Venom

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A. zaruma venom extract was analyzed by a bottom-up proteomic approach using positive electrospray ionization (ESI) performed on quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Impact II, Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Samples were prepared as follows: lyophilized crude venom extract of A. zaruma, was resuspended in water for a total stock concentration of 10 µg/µL. 100 µL of the stock solution was dissolved in 200 µL of 100% acetonitrile and cleared by centrifugation at 10 rpm for 5 min. 300 µL of supernatant was dissolved in 700 µL ddH20 to get a final concentration of 1 mg/mL A. zaruma venom extract (1/10 dilution). Different concentrations for histamine samples were prepared according to the same protocol: 0.1 µM, 1 µM, 10 µM and 100 µM. The Q-TOF system was operated in positive mode using Bruker TargetScreener HR 4.0. This program includes hardware, column and methods with a total analysis time including chromatographic separation and accurate mass detection of 20 min (12 ). During data acquisition, both MS and MS/MS full scan mode datasets were obtained. The MS raw data were obtained in format from Bruker Compass Data Analysis Viewer version 5.2 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mapping MdpL Hydrolysis Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides Drosocin (Anaspec, United States), H2686, H8390, Amyloid β (10–20), Neuromedin U-25, MOG (Bachem, Switzerland), and Insulin Chain B Oxidized (IOB; Sigma, United States) were incubated with MdpL (18 h, 37°C) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.5, with 20 mM L-cys to detect any preferential sites permitting MdpL hydrolysis. Fragments were separated using LC (Agilent Technologies 1,290 Infinity, C18) and analyzed by MS/MS (Bruker Impact II). MdpL hydrolysis sites were mapped using the Bruker Compass Data Analysis 5.2 and BioPharma Compass 4.0 software. Since the generated peptide ions have different flight characteristics during an ESI-TOF-MS run, the prevalence of amino acids was not based on area under the curve calculations. A sequence logo (WebLogo 3, University of Berkeley) illustrating the most occurring amino acid +/− three positions from the MdpL hydrolytic site was created by entering the 89 detected high score (>30) peptides generated from the hydrolysis of Neuromedin U-25, MOG, and Insulin Chain B Oxidized. Drosocin, H2686, H8390, and Amyloid β were not hydrolyzed by MdpL and thus were not included in the data acquisition. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2021 (link)) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD039681.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!