The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using jem 2100

1

Characterization of Adsorbent Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S4800, Hitachi Corp., Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, Hitachi Corp., Tokyo, Japan) were used to record the surface morphology of the adsorbent. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (GENESIS XM, EDAX Corp., New Castale, DE, USA) were used to analyze the element distribution. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was conducted by a Tensor II spectrometer (Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany) to identify the surface groups of the adsorbent. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using AXIS ULTRA DLD, (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). Thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis was performed using a TG/DTA (Perkin-Elmer, New Castale, DE, USA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker Corp., Karlsruhe, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Tin Oxide Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesized powder samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku RINT Ultima/PC with monochromated Cu–Kα radiation, Tokyo, Japan). Crystallite size of the obtained particles was estimated using the Scherrer equation (D = Kλ/βcosθ), where D, K, λ, and θ indicate crystallite size, Scherrer constant (0.90), X-ray wavelength (1.54 Å), and Bragg angle, respectively. The tin oxide samples were analyzed using XPS (XPS; ULVAC, Quantera SXM, Chigasaki, Japan). Nanostructures were characterized using SEM (HITACHI S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) and TEM (JEM-2100, Tokyo, Japan). Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra were obtained from the diffuse reflectance of the powder samples using a Hitachi U-4000 spectrophotometer. TG-DTA analysis in air flow was carried out using DTG 60H (SHIMADZU, Kyoto, Japan). The ramping rate was 10 °C/min. A confocal Raman microscope, RAMANtouch (Nanophoton Corp., Tokyo, Japan), was used to analyze the tin oxide samples. The powder samples were irradiated with laser light of 532 nm, and the laser power was adjusted to 5 mW/cm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of BiOI/KTaO3 Photocatalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phases of all the samples were characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, SU8220, Hitachi, Japan) and transmission electron (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) (JEM-2100) were used to observe the microstructure and element mapping of the samples. A UV visible absorption spectrum (DRS) was recorded using a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 spectrometer using BaSO4 powder as reference. The element state of BiOI/KTaO3 was characterized via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using an ESCALAB250Xi spectrometer. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded on a PLS920 fluorescence spectrometer at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Synthesis of Copper-Zinc Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A modified Stöber method was used to synthesize the Cu–Zn BGns.[49
] First, TEOS was mixed in ethanol (solution A) with ammonia, deionized water (DI‐H2O), and ethanol (solution B) with stirring. Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate was added after 30 min. Subsequently, zinc nitrate was added, and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 90 min before centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 min. The deposits were collected, washed with DI‐H2O thrice, and calcined at 700 °C for 2 h to obtain Zn‐BGns. Next, the Zn‐BGns were dissolved in DI‐H2O (solution C) with ammonia, CTAB, ethanol, and DI‐H2O (solution D) by stirring for 30 min, followed by a reaction with TEOS for 15 min. Next, we added Cu/ascorbic acid complex precursors,[50
] and the mixture was stirred for 24 h. The colloids were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 15 min, collected, washed with DI‐H2O twice and ethanol once, and dried at 60 °C overnight. Finally, Cu–Zn BGns were calcined at 700 °C for 2 h. The morphology and constituents of nanoparticles were determined using SEM (S4800, Hitachi, Japan) and TEM (JEM2100, Hitachi, Japan) with EDS. The chemical composition and state of the nanoparticles were analyzed using XRD (Bruker, Billerica, USA), XPS (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher, USA), and FTIR (Magna‐IR 750, Thermo Fisher, USA). DLS measurements were performed by a Wyatt Mobius DLS instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Precursor Powder and Sintered Alloy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition and microstructure of precursor powder, reduced composite powder and the sintered alloy were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/MAX-2500) with Cu Kα radiation, field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi model No. S 4800), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100), respectively. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) STEM images were taken on a JEOL JEM-ARM200F instrument using an annular-type detector. The S/TEM specimens were firstly ground to 20 μm on SiC abrasive papers and then thinned on an ion beam thinner (Gatan-PIPS695). Electron backscatter diffraction pattern (EBSD) mappings of cWY alloys were collected using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7800F) equipped with a CRYSTAL detector (NordlysMax2). The specimens for EBSD characterization were firstly ground on SiC abrasive papers. Then they were further polished on a metallographic lapping (UNIPOL-820) with the aid of diamond polishing spray, followed by electrolytic polishing in 5% sodium hydroxide aqueous solution with a constant voltage of 11 V and a current density of 3 mA/mm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition of the sample was determined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD MAC, M18XHF) with Cu Kα radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM Hitachi, S4800) uses the principle of focused electron beam (1 pA to 2 nA) scanning imaging on the surface of a sample to observe topography. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HTEM Hitachi, JEM-2100) uses a very short wavelength electron beam for illumination and an electromagnetic lens for focused imaging to further characterize the topography and physical appearance of the sample. The X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS Thermo, ESCALAB250) uses Al Kα as the excitation source and C 1s as the reference peak for calibration to analyze the elemental composition of the sample. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum was measured by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu). A photoluminescence (PL) spectrum was recorded using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (FL, HITACHI F-4500) under an environmental condition of an excitation wavelength of 325 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Materials Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU-8010) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100) measurements were taken to estimate the morphology and internal structure of samples. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained by Rigaku MiniFlex 600 (Cu Kα radiation). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed by the simultaneous thermal analysis instrument (METTLER TOLEDO TGA/DSC 3+). Micromeritics ASAP 2020 Plus HD88 was employed to measure N2 adsorption–desorption curves. The surface chemistry was analyzed based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab 250Xi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing GNSs@Ni Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology and microstructure of the GNSs@Ni samples were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S-4800) equipped with an X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100). The crystallographic structures of the samples were determined using X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD, Ultima-IV, Rigaku) equipped with Cu Kα radiation source at a scan rate of 8° min−1 from 10° to 80° (2θ degree). Raman spectroscopy (Lab RAMHR, Horiba, Jobin Yvon, 532 nm laser excitation) was performed to characterize the microstructure of the samples. The content of carbon elements in the GNSs@Ni and FGP@Ni electrodes was determined precisely by high frequency infrared carbon and sulfur analyzer (HW2000B, YingZhiCheng, Wuxi, China), and it is 0.18 mg cm−2 and 5.2 mg cm−2, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amorphous SiNPs used in the experiments were prepared by the Stöber method as previously described [35 (link)]. The particle shape and size was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Hitachi S-4800, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM2100, Japan). Based on the TEM results, the particle size distribution was analyzed through Image J software. The hydrodynamic size and Zeta potential of SiNPs in deionized water were measured by Zetasizer (Malvern Nano-ZS90, UK). Moreover, an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; Agilent 720, USA) was used for the purity detection of the synthesized SiNPs, and a gel-clot limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay kit (Bokang, Zhanjiang, China) for endotoxin measurement. In addition, the stock suspension of SiNPs were firstly dispersed by a sonicator (160 W, 20 kHz, 5 min; Bioruptor UCD-200, Belgium), and then diluted by the corresponding exposure media, 0.9% saline (in vivo test) or DMEM (in vitro test).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanomaterial Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water contact angles (WCAs) were determined by a contact angle meter (Powereach JC2000D1). The FTIR spectrum was recorded by a Nicolet iN10 spectrometer. Size distribution was determined by a Malvern size analyzer. The surface structure and elemental components were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) apparatus (Hitachi Co., Ltd.) equipped with an analytical assembly for detecting energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The structural morphologies of nano-silica aerogel were got by a transmission electron microscope apparatus (TEM, Hitachi JEM-2100). The porous structure and specific surface area (SSA) of the nano-aerogel were detected by the standard Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) approach, working on the basis of N2 adsorption at pressures of 0.05 < P/P0 < 0.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!