The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

70 protocols using anti myc

1

Comprehensive Antibody Analysis for Cellular Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, except OptiPrep (Axis-Shield), DCF (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Percoll (GE Healthcare). Antibodies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich against TMX1 and LC3 (rabbit antihuman); from EMD Millipore against SERCA2b (mouse antihuman) and against total as well as phosphorylated AMPK (rabbit antihuman); from Thermo Fisher Scientific against PDI, CHOP, and actin (mouse antihuman); from BD against BiP/GRP78 and p62 (mouse antihuman); from Abcam against FACL4 (goat antihuman), mitochondrial complex II (mouse antihuman), and PGC-1α (rabbit antihuman); and from Cell Signaling Technology. The antibodies against anti-myc (Invitrogen) and the FLAG tag (Rockland) were purchased as indicated. We thank L. Berthiaume (University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada) for the goat anti–human cytochrome c. The affinity-purified rabbit anti-TMX1 antiserum was generated by 21st Century Biochemicals using a peptide corresponding to amino acids 251–271 (AESKEGTNKDFPQNAIRQRSL). The rabbit anti–calnexin antibody has been previously described (Myhill et al., 2008 (link)). HeLa cells were from ECACC, and A375P cells were from E. Sviderskaya (St. George’s, University of London, London, England, UK). Melanoma tissue samples were purchased from the Alberta Tumor Bank.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Myc Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular protein (60 μg) was loaded onto a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) and electrophoresis was performed, followed by electroblotting to a PVDF membrane (Invitrogen). The blots were incubated with anti-myc (Invitrogen) and anti β-Actin (Invitrogen) antibodies as previously described [26 (link)]. Signals were detected using the luminescent image analyzer ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detection of Cell Wall Proteins and Pectins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein detection in the cell wall was performed by fixing 4-days-old seedlings in 100% (v/v) methanol for 30 s at room temperature. Epitopes were blocked by incubating seedlings for 2 h with Tris-buffered saline [TBS; 20 mM Tris (pH of 8), 150 mM NaCl] plus 3% bovine serum albumin. Seedlings were incubated overnight with primary antibody 1:1000 anti-myc (Invitrogen, USA) in TBS and 0.5% bovine serum albumin. Washes were performed using phosphate buffered saline plus 1% Triton X-100. Then roots were incubated in secondary antibody anti-mouse-Alexa488 (Invitrogen, USA) diluted 1:1000 in TBS 0.5% BSA. Seedlings were washed using phosphate buffered saline plus 1% Triton X-100 and mounted on 50% glycerol for confocal imaging.
Pectin detection in the cell wall was performed by fixing the cells in 4% paraformaldehyde, 50 mM Pipes, 5 mM MgSO4, and 5 mM EGTA. Blocking was performed using TBS plus 5% fat free milk. Overnight incubation utilized primary antibody 1:100 Jim5, Jim7, Jim11, Jim14, LM1, LM2, CCRCM1, or CCRCM4 in TBS and 0.5% fat free milk. Then, roots were incubated in secondary antibody anti-rat Alexa 488 diluted 1:1000 in TBS and 0.5% fat free milk. Washes were performed using TBS plus 0.05% Triton X-100. Seedlings were mounted on 50% glycerol for confocal imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Pgc1α Protein Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells (7.5x105) were grown on 6-well plates and treated and transfected as described above. Medium was replaced with complete DMEM supplemented with 150 μg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma) to inhibit protein synthesis. Cells were collected at different time points (0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 minutes) in PBS supplemented with the aforementioned protease inhibitor cocktail and 10 μM of proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Sigma) to avoid rapid degradation of Pgc1α. Cells were pelleted and lysed in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Proteins were separated in 8% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Blocked membranes were incubated with anti-myc (Invitrogen R950-25, 1:5000) and anti-actin and visualized as described previously. Western blots were analyzed using ImageJ (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Myc-tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular protein (60 μg) was loaded onto a NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) and electrophoresis was performed followed by electroblotting to a PVDF membrane (Invitrogen). The blots were incubated with anti-myc (Invitrogen) and anti β-actin (Invitrogen) antibodies that were used as primary antibodies. The blots were developed using Western Breeze (Invitrogen), which contains alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin and a chemiluminescent substrate for alkaline phosphatase. Signals were detected using the luminescent image analyzer ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

USP37 Regulation via Mutagenesis and Antibody Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human USP37 cDNA was subcloned into pcDNA3.1-Flag vector or PCDH vector and USP37-C350S was made using PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis method. All other constructs were generated using standard molecular cloning methods and were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Antibodies were commercially purchased: anti-USP37 (rabbit, 18465-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-Snail (rabbit, 3879, Cell Signaling), anti-Ubi (mouse, sc-8017, Santa Cruz), anti-actin (mouse, 60008-1-lg, Proteintech), anti-N-cadherin (mouse, 33-3900, Invitrogen), anti-HA (mouse, MMS-101P, Covance), anti-Flag (mouse, F3165, Sigma), anti-Flag (rabbit, F7425, Sigma), anti-Myc (mouse, 13-2500, Invitrogen), anti-GAPDH (mouse, 60004-1-Ig, Proteintech), normal IgG (rabbit, sc-2027, Santa Cruz), and GSH beads (GE). MG132 and cycloheximide (CHX) were obtained from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Lysis and Protein Immunoblotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were obtained using Tris-Triton lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and 0.1% SDS] supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Schlieren, Switzerland). Lysates were subjected to Bradford assay for protein quantification and denatured by adding 2 × Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) supplemented with 5% 2-Mercaptoethanol. The primary antibodies used in this study were as follows: anti-DJ-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; sc-55572, 1:100, USA), anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich; F3165, 1:20000, USA), anti-Myc (Invitrogen, 46–0603, 1:5000, USA), anti-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich; T5168, 1:5000), anti-ubiquitin (Cell Signaling Technology; 3936, 1:1000, USA), anti-TOM20 (Abcam; ab186735, 1:2000, UK), anti-HTRA2 (Abcam; ab32092, 1:500), and anti-HSP60 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; sc-59567, 1:800) antibodies. For cycloheximide (CHX) chase experiments, CHX and MG132 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Src Signaling Pathway Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in this study were: anti-Src (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-pSrc and anti-pY861-FAK (Invitrogen); anti-GM130 and anti-FAK (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, USA); anti-pY782-ASAP1 (Rockland Immunochemicals); anti-ASAP1 (Transduction Laboratories); anti-cortactin (p-Tyr 421; Merck Millipore); anti-HRP antibodies (Abcam); anti-myc (Invitrogen); fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes). The expression vectors used were: ssHRP and ssHRPKDEL (D.F. Cutler, MRC, London, UK); KDELR-D193N-eGFP (V. Hsu, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA); KDELR-D193N-myc from subcloning the KDELR coding sequence from KDELR-D193N-GFP into a myc-containing modified pCMV5 vector; FAK-WT and mutants (D.D. Schlaepfer, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Western Blot Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analyses were performed as previously described3 (link). Briefly, cell lysates were prepared using RIPA buffer with complete phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche) and boiled in Laemmli buffer for 5 min at 95 °C. Antibodies utilized were anti-Mef2c antibody (1:1,000; Cell Signaling, 5030), anti-Gata4 antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz, sc25310), anti-Tnnt2 antibody (1:500; Thermo Scientific, MA5–12960), anti-GFP antibody (1:500; Thermo Scientific, A-11122), anti-PHF7 antibody (1:500; LSBio, B11090), anti-Ty1 antibody (1:1,000; Diagenode, C15200054), anti-Myc (1:1,000; Invitrogen, 46–0603), anti-Flag (1:1,000; Sigma, F7425), anti-mCherry antibody (1:1,000; Abcam, ab167453) and anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1,000; Merck Millipore, MAB374).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Interaction Profiling in HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PHF7Flag-HA was co-expressed with GFP, Gata4Myc, Hand2Myc or Mef2cMyc, or SMARCD3Flag-HA was co-expressed with PHF3xTy1 or GFP in HEK293 cells for 72 h. Experiments involving crosslinking were adapted from Zlatic et al.37 , whereby cells were treated with 200 μM dithiobis(succinimid ylpropionate) (DSP) or dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 4 h at 4 °C and quenched with 25 mM Tris for 15 min. Pre-cleared lysates were incubated with Flag magnetic beads (Sigma, M8823) overnight. The Flag epitope tag was eluted using 0.5 mg ml−1 free 3× Flag peptide (Sigma). The final elution and input obtained before immunoprecipitation were analysed by western blotting using an anti-Myc (Invitrogen), anti-Ty1 (Diagenode) or rabbit anti-Flag antibody (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!