The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Humic acid sodium salt

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany

Humic acid sodium salt is a chemical compound derived from the decomposition of organic matter. It is a dark-colored, water-soluble substance that acts as a natural chelating agent, capable of binding and transporting various minerals and nutrients. The core function of this product is to serve as a versatile additive in various applications, including soil remediation, plant growth enhancement, and water treatment processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using humic acid sodium salt

1

Zein-Based Hybrid Adsorbent Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified zein, KCl, salt (reagent grade), acetic acid (100%, Glacial, Anhydrous), toluene (HPLC grade, Fischer Chemical), hexane (HPLC grade, Fischer Chemical), Tween 20 (Ultrapure, Thermo Scientific), oleic acid (99.0 +%, TCI America) were purchased from Fisher Scientific. Chitosan (75% deacetylated, ACROS Organics), 2-hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) and hydroxyethylcellulose ethoxylate, quaternized (HEC +) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Tetrahydrofuran (THF, UN2056) was purchased from Caledon Laboratories Ltd. TCE (ACS, 99.5% min) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Ethanol (anhydrous, commercial alchols) was purchased from Greefield Global Inc. Nile Red (technical grade, 95% pure) and humic acid sodium salt (abbreviated as humic acids, HA) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Ottawa sand was purchased from BEI/PECAL (Stake Technology Ltd.). Deionised (DI) water was used in all experiments. The pH of DI water was approximately pH = 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electrochemical Analysis of Humic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Humic acid sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), graphite (flakes, mp 3652–3697 °C, density 1.9, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), perchloric acid (HClO4) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and KBr (Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) were utilized as received. The aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure deionized water (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Preparation of Metal-Humate Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IL precursors trihexyltetradecylphosphonium chloride (95%) and 3-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid (98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), methyl-trioctylphosphonium methylcarbonate (purum, 50% in methanol) and methyl-trioctylammonium methylcarbonate (purum, 50% in methanol) from Proionic (Austria). For synthesis and sample preparations, potassium hydroxide (p.a., 85%) from Merck (Germany), methanol (HPLC grade, 99.9%), dichloromethane (HPLC grade, 99.9%), sodium chloride (99%), nitric acid (p.a., 65%), and sodium hydroxide (98%) from Panreac (Spain), and humic acid sodium salt (technical grade) from Sigma-Aldrich were used. Standard solutions of metals Ag, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, and Pb 1,000 mg L−1 in 2–4% (w/w) HNO3, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, were used for atomic absorption spectroscopy measurements and to prepare feed solutions. Ultra-pure water of resistivity <18.2 MΩ cm was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q Academic apparatus (Merck Millipore, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Trace Metal Analysis in Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals were supplied by commercial sources and used without further purification: ammonium hydroxide solution (NH3 in H2O, 25%, Riedel-de-Häen), chromium(III) (Cr3+ in HNO3, 1000 mg/L, Inorganic Ventures), cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2.6H2O, 98%, Panreac), ethanol (C2H5OH, > 99%, Panreac), humic acid sodium salt (technical grad, Sigma-Aldrich), iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4.7H2O, > 99%, Merk), nitric acid (HNO3, puriss. p.a., 65%, Merck), potassium hydroxide (KOH, > 98%, Pronolab), potassium nitrate (KNO3, > 99%, Merk), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, > 98%, Pronolab).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Modeling Fouling Behavior in Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Model identification experiments were performed using humic acid sodium salt (technical grade from Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 20 mg/L. This concentration was high enough to produce severe fouling in a short time. The experiments were carried out between 2 and 5 h. The temperature of the feed tank was maintained at 25 °C. The applied pressure range to build the model was between 0.3 to 2.5 bar. During the experiments, the inlet and outlet pressure, the concentrate flow rate, and the permeate flow were sampled at a rate of 1 s. The solenoid valve opening percentage and pump rotational speed were the two variables manipulated by the control system during the fouling operating stage to meet the pressure and flow requirements. The control actions were carried out at a rate of 20 s. To recover the permeate flow, a CIP operation was performed after each model identification experiment using a 0.1 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication of CNT-PES Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nitric acid (ACS reagent, 70%) and sulfuric acid (ACS reagent, 95.0–98.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). The raw multi-wall carbon nanotubes (abbreviated as CNT, CM-95, 93–97%) were purchased from Hanwha-nanotech (Seoul, Republic of Korea). PES (Veradel® 3000 P, Brussels, Belgium) with a molecular weight 62,000–64,000 g/mol, was obtained from Solvay Specialty Polymers. N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP, anhydrous 99.5%) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with an average molecular weight 10,000 g/mol, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Humic acid sodium salt (HA, technical grade) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich for filtration and antifouling performance tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Humic Acid Membrane Fouling Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this work, a Humic Acid sodium salt with technical grade (CAS: 68131-04-4) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. A stock solution was prepared, as the foulant, by dissolving an amount of HA in deionized water. A standard concentration of (50 ppm) of Humic Acid was prepared by dissolving HA in DI. The working solutions of required concentration were prepared by sequential dilution of the standard solution. The control foulant concentrations were measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at λmax = 600 nm at initial concentrations of 15–45 mg/L. Consequently, the fouling performance of the polyethylene membranes was tested in the pilot-scale DCMD system. The HA rejection was calculated based on the HA concentration obtained by the UV spectrophotometer. The initial HA concentration was measured by taking a sample from the feed before starting the DCMD experiment (the control), and the final HA concentration that is collected from the permeate is the measured value. The rejection values were calculated for different HA concentrations using the difference between the control and measured concentrations divided by the control adsorption.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Reagents and Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium arsenite, sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate (≥98%), methanol (OptimaTM for HPLC), tert-butanol (t-BuOH), acetonitrile (HPLC grade), o-phosphoric acid (85%, ACS grade), formic acid (88%), ammonium hydroxide (29.2%), and ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, 98.8%) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O, ≥99%), humic acid sodium salt (Lot#STBC5468V), coumarin (COU) (≥99%), potassium sorbate (≥99%), and 7-hydroxycoumarin (7-HC) (99%) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Furfuryl alcohol (FFA) and the tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAH) (40 wt.%) were purchased from Acros Organic (Geel, Antwerp, Belgium). The 2,4,6-trimethylphenol (98%), was obtained from TCI (Portland, OR, USA). The malonic acid (reagent grade, 99.5%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). Millipore water (MilliQ water, resistivity~18.0 MΩ cm−1 at 25 °C) was used for sample and standard preparation unless otherwise indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Polymeric Composite Membranes for Pollutant Removal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polysulfone (PSF, Mn ∼22 000),
homopiperazine (HP,
98%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, >98%, pellets), lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2, 99.9%), cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate (Cd(NO3)2·4H2O, 98%), humic acid sodium
salt (HA), and ethylenediamine (EDA, >99%) were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich.
1,3,5-Benzenetricarboxylic acid chloride (TMC, 98%) was purchased
from Acros. Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) of different molecular weights
and N,N′-dimethylformamide
(DMF, anhydrous, 99.8%) were purchased from Loba Chemie. Isopar-G
was purchased from Univar. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) nonwoven fabric
(PET, K#01 3249) was purchased from Hollytex. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA,
>99.8%), sodium chloride (NaCl, >99.5%), anhydrous sodium sulfate
(Na2SO4, >99.0%), and anhydrous magnesium
sulfate
(MgSO4, >98.0%) were obtained from Fisher Scientific.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Batch Electrochemical Oxidation with BDD Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the impact of NOM, turbidity, pH, and ferrous iron on EO with BDD electrodes, batch EO tests were performed at a constant current of 20 mA (i = 1.3 mA/cm 2 ) for 5 min. Sodium bicarbonate (2.1 mM) was added to ultrapure water for a background electrolyte solution, and pH was adjusted with 1 M H2SO4 or NaOH. NOM, turbidity, and ferrous iron tests were conducted at pH 7; pH tests were conducted at pH 6, 7, and 8. NOM was added as humic acid sodium salt (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at concentrations of 0.1-15 mg/L total organic carbon (TOC). Turbidity was increased by adding A2 test dust (Powder Technology Inc., Arden Hills, MN) to approximately 1-30 NTU. Contributions of NOM to TOC were measured using a TOC-V CSN total organic carbon analyser (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) following sample acidification with analytical grade hydrochloric acid. Though NOM contributes to turbidity, tests were performed by adding enough A2 dust to provide the target turbidity (see SI 2) independent of NOM. Turbidity was measured using a Hach 2100AN Turbidimeter (Hach, Loveland, CO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!