The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Teneo sem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Teneo SEM is a scanning electron microscope designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of materials at the nanoscale. It provides advanced capabilities for detailed surface characterization and elemental composition analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using teneo sem

1

Deep-sea sediment trap analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A short mooring line (~50 m long) was deployed at 42° 01′N–4° 48′E (depth of 2400 m). It was equipped with a Technicap PPS-3 sediment trap (collecting area of 0.125 m2, aspect ratio of 2.5, and 12 collecting cups) at 30 m above the seabed. The trap samples were collected with sampling interval between 15 and 23 days. Prior to deployment, the sampling bottles were filled with 0.45 µm filtered seawater containing sodium borate-buffered formalin to yield a final concentration of 5% formalin to prevent in situ microbial decomposition. Upon recovery, samples were stored in the dark at 4 °C76 (link). 1 mL aliquots were filtered onto the center of 0.4 µm polycarbonate filter using a filtering funnel of 6 mm aperture, and carefully rinsed with DIW water, then dehydrated in increasing series of ethanol 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% during 10 mn for each step. The samples were completely dried overnight, mounted on aluminum stubs with double sticky carbon tabs, and sputter-coated with gold for 10 min. The samples from each of the three available trap samples were analyzed with a FEI Teneo SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Malaria-Infected RBCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole infected RBCs were fixed and imaged as previously described [25 (link)]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging of the cytoplasmic surface of the host RBC membranes was performed on sheared infected RBC membranes. The membranes were prepared as previously described [25 (link)]. Briefly, glass coverslips were cleaned with acetone and 50% methanol and functionalized with 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES), bis-sulfosuccimidyl suberate, and erythroagglutinating phytohemagglutinin (PHAE). Mature infected-RBCs were immobilized on the functionalized glass slides and sheared by forceful application of a hypotonic buffer (5 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, 10 mM NaCl, pH 8). For CS2 and ΔPTP7 cells, coverslips were coated with gold at 25 mA for 40 s and 75 s using a Dynavac sputter coating instrument to thicknesses of ~0.2 nm and ~0.4 nm for the sheared and whole cells, respectively. Otherwise, whole cells were gold-coated with a Safematic CCU-010 sputter coater to a thickness of 5 nm. Images were acquired with the T1 (A+B, for CS2 and ΔPTP7 whole cells) or the Everhart-Thornley detector in ‘Optiplan’ mode (for whole cells and sheared membranes) of an FEI Teneo SEM using a working distance of 5 mm, a beam current level of 50 pA, and 2 kV accelerating voltage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Decidual Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Decidual tissue with diameter of 1 mm from normal pregnant mice in the NP group and aborted mice of the A30E group were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 2 h, then fixed in 1% osmic acid at 4 °C for 1 h. After washed with 0.1 M PBS, tissue samples were in turn dehydrated and with 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 90% ethanol, 100% ethanol (3 times), then ethanol:isoamyl acetate (1:1), and 100% isoamyl acetate. Samples were dried on a Samdri®-795 ‍Critical point drier (Tousimis, U.S.A.) and sprayed with 10 nm metal conductive thin layer on an EMS 550 Ion beam sputtering coating instrument (EMS, U.S.A.). Samples were then observed and imaged under scanning electron microscope Teneo SEM (FEI, U.S.A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEM Characterization of Biomineralized Collagen Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM morphological characterization, both the uncoated and CoCaP-coated biomineralized collagen membrane were dehydrated in a series of ethanol in water (30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100%), 15 min per step, followed by 30 min in hexadimethylsiloxane before drying overnight. The membranes with cells underwent the same treatment, but preceded by a cell-lysis step with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min in an ultrasonic waterbath, with ice. After dehydration, samples were glued onto aluminum stubs with carbon tape and silver paint, and sputter-coated with a 2 nm layer of iridium using a Q150TES sputter coater (Quorum, United Kingdom). Imaging was performed on a TENEO SEM (FEI, OR, United States) using the T1 in-column or back-scatter detectors in Optiplan mode, with the beam at 2–10 kV and working distance of 2–10 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of 3D Neural Networks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of the 3D neural networks on the PPs were washed twice in PBS before being fixed in a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2% PFA in 0.1 M Hepes buffer for 3 h at room temperature, followed by overnight fixation in 4°C. The samples were then washed twice for 5 min in Hepes buffer, subsequently dehydrated in 5 min steps using increasing ethanol concentrations (20–50–70–90–100–100% ethanol), and dried in 10 min steps using hecamethyldisiloxane (HMDS) (50% and 2× 100%) before being air-dried in a desiccator. The samples were subsequently mounted on aluminium pins with double-sided carbon tape and sputter coated (Polaron) with Gold/Palladium (30 nm thickness). The samples were then examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Teneo SEM, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 10–15 kV with an ETD detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of KG1a Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The harvested KG1a cells (107 cells) were washed twice with HBSS. The cells were fixed in 2-2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Cacodylate buffer (pH = 7.2–7.4) in 4 °C for overnight. The fixed cells were washed three times with the 0.1 M Cacodylate buffer with 15 min submerged in buffer before the next wash and resuspended in the 200 μl of the buffer. Then, 100 μl of the cell suspension was added on a cover slip, which was brushed with polylysine and incubated overnight inside a moisturized chamber before use. The cells were further fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M Cacodylate buffer for one hour in dark. The cells were washed three times with distilled water, where they were submerged in water for 15 min before the next wash, and dehydrated in gradient ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100%). Samples were carried further onto the Critical Point Drying apparatus and covered with 100% ethanol to completely submerge the samples. The dehydrated cells were placed on a holder of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and coated with 4 mm platinum (K575X Sputter Coater, Quorum). The SEM images were recorded using Teneo SEM (Thermo Fischer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Particle Size Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were partly acquired using a Teneo SEM from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The measurements were conducted at Enabling Technologies. Other images were acquired using a Hitachi S4800 FESEM or a FEI quanta 600 microscope. For sample preparation one droplet of the particle dispersion was placed on a silicon wafer and dried at room temperature. The samples were sputtered with gold. Particle diameters and standard deviations from SEM images were determined using MATLAB. For average diameter and standard deviation at least 200 particles per sample were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Spray Dried Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron micrographs were collected with a Teneo SEM (ThermoFisher Scientific, United States) under low vacuum conditions of 0.4 mbar, using a large field detector, 10 kV accelerating voltage, 0.1 nA and a working distance of 10 mm. For preparation, spray dried powder samples were fixed on aluminum stubs with adhesive carbon discs. The samples were sputter coated for 90 s with 60:40 gold:palladium in a EMS575X sputter coater (Electron Microscopy Sciences) with a final coating thickness of approximately 18 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SEM-EDX Analysis of Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM samples were prepared by direct fiber deposition on carbon double-tape-covered aluminum stubs with excess material removal. A ThermoFisher Teneo SEM (Waltham, MA, USA) (5 keV acceleration voltage, 0.1 nA beam current, at the Core Labs of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) with a field emission gun, EDAX SDD detector for X-ray spectroscopy analysis, and secondary scattered electron imaging from in-lens T2 and T1 detectors were used. SEM-EDX chemical analysis was conducted at a 15 keV acceleration voltage and 1.6 nA beam current, with a good signal/noise ratio and heavy element excitation by X-ray emission. Oxford Instruments INCA (version 5.05) software was used for qualitative and quantitative EDS analyzes that were collected at a small point. The ECNF quantitative EDS analysis was approximated because of the large EDS interaction volume, which has a greater influence than fiber diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!