The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sx165

Manufactured by Rayonix
Sourced in United States

The SX165 is a high-performance X-ray detector designed for scientific and industrial applications. It features a large active area, high spatial resolution, and fast readout capabilities, making it a versatile tool for a wide range of X-ray imaging and diffraction applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using sx165

1

Characterization of Organic Photovoltaic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The current density–voltage characteristics of the OPVs were obtained using the Keithley 2400 SourceMeter under AM 1.5 G irradiation (100 mW/cm2) in a 150 W Xenon lamp-based solar simulator (McScience, South Korea) at room temperature.
The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the OPVs were monochromatically measured by the K3100 EQX IPCE measurement system (McScience, South Korea) using a 300 W Xenon lamp.
The UV–visible absorption spectra were obtained by UV-2450 (Shimadzu, Japan).
The surface topology and the thickness of the films were scanned through atomic force microscopy (AFM) (AFM5100N, Hitachi) in the tapping mode.
The grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) measurements were performed at the PLS-II 9 A U-SAXS beamline of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (Korea). The operating conditions were set at a wavelength of 1.12 Å and a sample-to-detector distance of 224 mm. The incidence angle (αi) herein was set at 0.130°. The 2D GIXRD patterns were recorded using a 2D CCD detector (SX-165, Rayonix) with an exposure time of 10–60 s. All the films for the GIXRD had a similar film thickness of ∼80 nm and were spin-coated on PEDOT/PSS-coated Si substrates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Grazing-Incidence X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GI-WAXD measurements were conducted at the PLS-II 9A U-SAXS beamline of PAL in Korea. The X-rays from the in-vacuum undulator were monochromated (wavelength = 1.11 Å) using a double-crystal monochromator and focused both horizontally and vertically (FWHM = 300 μm (H) × 30 μm (V) at the sample position) using K–B type mirrors. The GI-WAXD system was equipped with a seven-axis motorized sample stage for the fine alignment of thin film. The sample-to-detector distance was 224 mm, and diffraction patterns were recorded with a 2D charge-coupled device detector (Rayonix SX165).
The AFM and EDX analysis were performed on Nanoscope III and LEO GEMINI 1530VP FEG-SEM system, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synchrotron SAXS Analysis of Liquid Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAXS was utilized to evaluate the liquid crystal systems in all four formulations. SAXS experiments were performed with SAXS beamline (BL1.3W: Small/Wide angle X-ray scattering—SAXS/WAXS, Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization), Thailand). The multipole wiggler insertion device was used as a synchrotron radiation source that generates high intensity photons with an optimized energy range of 6–9 keV. It can measure sample structures ranging between 1 and 100 nm. In the experiment, the temperature of the sample was controlled at 30 °C during the measurement. The X-ray energy was selected at 9 keV using a double multilayer monochromator. The SAXS intensity profiles were obtained by circularly averaging the measured 2D scattering patterns from a CCD detector (Rayonix SX165).
The SAXS intensity profiles were obtained as a function of the scattering vector, q [where q=4πsinθ/2/λ , θ is the scattering angle, and λ is the X-ray wavelength]22 (link). The scattering vector, q, was calculated and reported as the d-spacing or period size (α) using the Pseudo Voigt curve fitting function in the SAXSIT version 4.50 program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SAXS Analysis of Pohang Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAXS measurements were performed on the 4C and 9A beamlines at the Pohang accelator laboratory. X-ray beams with a wavelength of 0.735 Å and an energy resolution (ΔE/E) of approximately 2 × 10−4 were obtained from a double crystal monochromator with a Si(111) crystal at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (Pohang, Korea). Scattered X-ray intensities were measured by a 2-dimensional CCD camera (SX165, Rayonix; Evanston, IL USA). Sample cells with a thickness of 0.8 mm were used, and the windows on both sides were sealed with Kapton films. The sample-to-detector distance was 2 m, covering the q range of 0.012–0.17 Å−1. The q range was calibrated using silver behenate [24 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Crystalline Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction was performed using MicroMax-007HF (Rigaku Corp.) equipped with rotating anode Mo-Kα (λ = 0.7093 Å) with multilayer optics (VariMax-Mo, Rigaku) and imaging plate (IP) detector (R-axis IV++, Rigaku). X-ray generator was operated at 1.2 KW (50 kV, 24 mA), and X-ray beam size was reduced to 100 μm using pin-hole collimator. Sample to detector distance was about 120 mm, and typical exposure time was about 10 min. IPanalyzer v3.551 and Crystalclear v2.0 software were used to calibrate and process the 2D images. In the case of K-NAT, data were measured using synchrotron radiation at beamline 9A of Pohang light source (PLS). Experimental parameters were 20.07 KeV X-ray (λ = 0.6178 Å), 100 μm beam size, 15 sec of exposure time, and CCD detector (Rayonix SX165, 80 μm in pixel size) with S-to-D of 218.577 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analysis of Scattering Pattern Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-dimensional scattering images recorded with a Rayonix SX165 detector were azimuthally averaged to give one-dimensional scattering patterns. The scattering angle θ was converted to momentum transfer q using the formula q=4π/λsin(θ/2), where λ=1.377 Å is the X-rays wavelength. Since the changes induced in the scattering patterns by optical photoexcitation account for less than a percent of the absolute signal, data were normalized30 (link) at 1.4±0.1 Å−1 before calculating difference patterns with respect to the pattern measured at −100 ps. For a given time delay, each scattering difference is compared with the average difference and a simple reduced criterion is used to discard the differences that are too far away from the average one. In the formula above, Ii refers to the scattered intensity for a given time delay and q-bin, Ii is the scattered intensity averaged over all repetitions, and σi is the error bar on the experimentally measured intensity. The differences that satisfy the above criterion are then used to produce the averages difference patterns shown in the paper. This procedure usually rejects ~15–25% of the differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering of Magnetic Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements were carried out at the 4C beam-line in the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) in South Korea. Beam energy was 19.6 keV (wavelength: 0.633 Å) and exposure time was 15 s. The two-dimensional (2D) SAXS patterns were recorded by a CCD detector (Rayonix SX165, USA). Sample-to-detector distances were fixed at 0.5 m. The scattering angles for SAXS were calibrated by silver behenate. Aluminum (Al) holder (thickness: 1 mm) with an Al foil cover (thickness: 15 μm) was used. The holder was placed on the magnet as shown in Fig. 2a and X-ray measurements were carried out every 20 s for 15 min.

(a) Scheme of the sample holder for SAXS measurements. The direction of a magnetic field is perpendicular to the magnet at the measuring point. (b) The determination of Herman's orientation factor (f) using two-dimensional SAXS patterns. The integrated intensity corresponding to Ф = 0°–90° was used to obtain the orientation parameter.

Fig. 2
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing PS-b-PMMA Film Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS) experiments were performed at the 9A beam-line at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL), Korea. The typical operating conditions were set at a wavelength of 1.112 Å and a sample-to-detector distance of 6.48 m. The incidence angle (αi) was set at 0.080 to 0.140o, which were below and above the critical angle (0.113o) to probe the surface and entire film structures, respectively. 2D GISAXS patterns were recorded using a 2D detector (SX-165, Rayonix) positioned at the end of a vacuum guide tube with an exposure time of 10 s.
To examine the surface morphology of PS-b-PMMA films, atomic force microscopy (AFM; Dimension 3100, Veeco Digital Instrument Co.) was operated in a tapping mode. A standard silicon nitride probe was used at 3% offset below their resonance frequencies ranging from 250 to 350 kHz, where height and phase images were taken at a scanning speed of 7 μm/s. SEM images of dry-etched PS-b-PMMA films were measured with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; JSM-6701F, JEOL) under an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV using a semi-in-lens detector. To enhance the phase contrast between the PS and PMMA blocks, asymmetric dry (or plasma) etching (VITA, Femto Sci.) mode was operated with an O2/Ar (5/1 in volume ratio) gas mixture under an RF power of 100 W at 150 mTorr and 18 sccm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GIWAXS and NEXAFS Analysis of PffBT4T-2DT Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GIWAXS measurement was carried out with Pohang Accelerator Laboratory beamline using an In-Vacuum Undulator 20B source (11.08 keV) and a 2D CCD detector (Rayonix SX165, USA). The incidence angles were 0.08° (αi < αc) and 0.11°(αi ~ αc). The samples for GIWAXS measurements were fabricated on silicon substrates using the same recipe for the devices. NEXAFS experiments were detected by Scienta R3000 with 1011 (photon/s) intensity from a bending magnet-type light source (beam size ~0.7 mm by 1.2 mm) and fully calibrated with Au 4f peak. Angle-resolved NEXAFS spectroscopy was conducted in total electron yield mode to collect the molecular orientation information from the uppermost (~10 nm) surface part of the PffBT4T-2DT thin films.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Organic Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were acquired using a Bruker Dimension EDGE in tapping mode. The GIWAXS data was obtained from the PLS II 3C SAXS-I and 9A U-SAXS beamline of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory in Korea. The active layer samples were deposited on the Si/PEDOT:PSS substrates following device conditions. The X-rays coming from the in-vacuum undulator (IVU) were monochromated (wavelength λ = 1.10994 Å) using a double crystal monochromated and focused both horizontally and vertically (100 (H) × 20 (V) μm2 in FWHM @ the sample position) using K-B type mirrors. The grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering sample stage was equipped with a 7-axis motorized stage for the fine alignment of the sample, and the incidence angles of the X-beam was set to be 0.11°–0.13°. The GIWAXS patterns were recorded with a 2D CCD detector (Rayonix SX165) and an X-ray irradiation time within 100 s, dependent on the saturation level of the detector. Diffraction angles were calibrated using a sucrose standard (monoclinic, P21, a = 10.8631 Å, b = 8.7044 Å, c = 7.7624 Å, and β = 102.938°) and sample-to-detector distance was ~231 mm. The GISAXS measurements were performed with a Xeuss 2.0 SAXS/WAXS laboratory beamline using a Cu X-ray source (8.05 keV, 1.54 Å) and a Pilatus3R 300 K detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!