The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using syto 63

1

Multimodal Imaging of Sludge Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). CLSM (FV1200, Olympus, Japan) was employed to capture the images of the sludge samples before and after the pretreatment. SYTO 63 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology, China), concanavalin A (Con A, Xi'an Baiying Bio-Technology, China), and Calcofluor white (CW, Kulaibo Bio-Technology, China) were used to stain cells, proteins, α-d-glucopyranose polysaccharides, and β-D glucopyranose polysaccharides, respectively. Detailed operational procedures can be found in Text S1.
Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (SEM-EDS). To observe the sludge morphology before and after the pretreatment, the samples were fixed with 2.50% glutaraldehyde solution for 2 h. Then, they were dehydrated with ethanol and tert-butyl alcohol. The samples were freeze-dried and then imaged with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SEISS Gemini 300). The EDS spectrometer (OXFORD Xplore) was used for the energy spectrum test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Biofilm Penetration Analysis by Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The penetration of beads into the biofilm was quantified by confocal microscopy and image analysis. After exposure, the biofilms were fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution to preserve structure (von Ohle et al. 2010) . The fixed biofilms were stained with the nucleic acid stain Syto 63 (Invitrogen) to visualize the total biomass and subsequently imaged under Confocal Laser Scanner Microscope (CLSM, Leica TCS SP5). A non-treated biofilm was used as control. Confocal 3D stacks were collected f or each of three independent replicates for the non-treated, static, shaking and microspray experiments. For the biofilms exposed to the microsprays we took confocal images from three locations 1 to 2 mm outside of the clearance zone caused by the microspray (Supplemental material 1, Figure 1A, Appendix Figure 1A-B). For the 30 o shot we distinguished between the proximal area and distal areas with respect to distance from the device nozzle. For the non-treated, static and shaking exposures we collected data at 3 random positions on the slide (Supplemental material 1, Appendix Figure 1C). To quantify the penetration of the beads into the biofilm we used a relative depth ratio (RD BEADS ) to account for differences in biofilm thickness at each XY pixel location on the substratum, as explained previously (Miller et al. 2013 ) (Supplemental material 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualization of Biofilm Cellular Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the growth of mat like biofilms on agar plates, 500 μL of 10 μM Syto 63 (S11345 from Thermo-fisher scientific) solution in Tris buffer was pipetted on the agar plate. The dye was allowed to stain the biofilms for 30 min. The biofilms were then scraped on the gene-frames (AB0576 from Thermo-fisher scientific) attached to a glass slide and sealed with a coverslip on the top. Images of the cellular structure were acquired with a Leica SP8 confocal microscope at a distance of 10–15 μm from the bottom glass coverslip using a ×100, 1.4 numerical aperture objective lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

S. mutans Biofilm Growth and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. mutans UA159 (ATCC 700610) biofilms were grown for 72 h on glass microscope slides at 37°C and 5% CO2 in brain heart infusion (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% (wt/vol) porcine gastric mucin (type II; Sigma-Aldrich). After the growth period, the biofilm-covered slides were gently rinsed in 1% (wt/vol) phosphate-buffered saline solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and placed in petri dishes (49 ). Biofilm thickness was determined by fixing untreated samples with 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde and staining with Syto 63 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). Subsequently, three random confocal images were taken on three independent replicate biofilm slides, with a thickness of 51.8 ± 4.9 μm measured using COMSTAT software; thus, we used a biofilm thickness (Lb) of 55 μm in the simulations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Biofilm Development Protein and Bacterial Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein and bacterial staining was conducted according to previous study [30 (link)]. We monitored the changes in protein at a series of time points (2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, and 24 h) during the biofilm development in 24-well plate. 20 μM SYTO 63 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was added to specimen for 30 min to stain bacteria (excitation/emission channel are 657 nm/673 nm); subsequently, the specimen was incubated with 100 μg/mL FITC (excitation/emission channel are 495 nm/525 nm) for 1 h to stain proteins. The bacteria were stained red while proteins were stained green. The biofilms formed on glass slides were examined by CLSM (Nikon A1, Nikon Corporation, Japan) with a 60x objective lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Microscopy of Biofilms with Kaempferol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The confocal microscopy experiment was performed using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (Olympus, Shanghai, China). Syto 63 and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) were purchased from Invitrogen Molecular Probes (Oregon). The biofilms were cultured according to the above method on glass cover slides with or without kaempferol (64 μg/ml). The biofilms produced by each group were washed with PBS after 12 h. Syto 63 (100 μM) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated with shaking for 5 min. FITC (0.001%) was then added, and the plate was incubated for another 30 min without shaking. The cells were washed with PBS to remove excess stain. Confocal microscopy images were obtained from NIS-Elements C version 3.2 (Nikon Eclipse).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing Microbial Cells on Carbon Felt

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the experiment, the carbon felt substratum was removed from each reactor and fixed onto a glass slide. To visualize total cells, the sample was mixed with 100 μL 20 μmol/L Syto 63 solution (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubated for 30 min [44] (link). The stained sample was then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) to remove excess dye and imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss LSM710, Germany) equipped with a 100 × oil objective. Image processing and analysis were made using ZEN blue software (version 2012, Carl Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!