The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Endosafe pts system

Manufactured by Charles River Laboratories
Sourced in United States

The Endosafe-PTS system is a rapid endotoxin testing device developed by Charles River Laboratories. It is designed to determine the presence and quantity of endotoxins in samples. The system utilizes quantitative chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay technology to provide quick and accurate endotoxin detection results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using endosafe pts system

1

Purification and Characterization of Salmonella Antigens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified COPS and FliC monomers for use as vaccine antigens for immunization and antibody measurements by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were generated from S. Enteritidis reagent strain CVD 1943, as described [20 (link), 23 (link)]. Endotoxin removal was confirmed by endpoint limulus amebocyte lysate assay with an Endosafe PTS system (Charles River, MA). Nucleic acid removal was assessed by A260 nm for COPS and Quant-IT Sybr Green assay (Life Technologies, CA) for FliC. Removal of host cell protein in the COPS preparation was confirmed with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo, MA) and by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining for FliC. S. Enteritidis COPS identity and molecular size were confirmed by Dionex HPAEC-PAD and HPLC-SEC respectively as described [16 (link)]. Flagellin identification was accomplished by SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis with monoclonal antibody CA6IE2, and confirmation of monomeric form by HPLC-SEC as described [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polysialic Acid Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During cultivation, downstream processing and for the final characterization of the product several analysis were performed. The polySia concentration was measured with a modified thiobarbituric acid assay, protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method, DNA concentration by UV–vis absorption (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA), endotoxin concentration with Endosafe-PTS™ system (Endosafe-PTS™, Charles River Laboratories, Boston, USA) and the chain length characterization with DMB-HPLC analysis (DMB = 1,2-diamino-4,5-methylenedioxybenzene). Cell disruption was performed with ultrasonic treatment. All methods were performed as previously reported [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Endotoxin Testing of Final Product

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of bacterial endotoxins was tested on the residual volume of each batch of final product after aliquoting into cryovials. Testing was performed at CSCC with the compendial method LAL kinetic chromogenic method D, using the Endosafe-PTS system (Charles River, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The protocol was validated according to Ph. Eur [36 , 37 ], which included a test for interfering factors and a suitability test. Acceptance criteria for endotoxin was 70 IU/ml = Endotoxin Limit = K (threshold pyrogenic dose/kg body mass)/M (maximum recommended bolus dose).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Endotoxin Quantification of SitC Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified SitC-SA and SitC-SC were tested for endotoxin contamination using the Endosafe-PTS System (Charles River, USA). Endotoxin levels for 1 µg/ml protein solutions were <0.005 EU/ml for SitC-SA and 0.006 EU/ml for SitC-SC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Endosafe-PTS for Mycoplasma Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Endosafe-PTS system (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. The Venor qEP (Minerva Biolabs, Berlin, Germany) Kit was used for the amplification of a mycoplasma-specific 16S rRNA gene region and detection by real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In vitro adventitious agents’ detection in MSC samples were performed on MRC5 and Vero cells. If cytopathic effect was observed after 14–28 days of culture, PCR and immunofluorescence techniques were used to identify contamination agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Recombinant Expression of Ascarid Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA coding for As16 without its signal peptide was codon optimized for expression in yeast and synthesized by GenScript. The DNA coding for As14 without its signal peptide was PCR amplified with As14 specific primers from A. suum larvae cDNA reverse-transcribed from total larval RNA. As16 and As14 coding DNAs were subcloned into the yeast expression vector pPICZαA (ThermoFisher Scientific, Carlsbad). The correct sequences and reading frames of the recombinant plasmids were confirmed by double-stranded DNA sequencing using vector flanking primers, α-factor and 3’-AOX1. The recombinant As16 and As14 (rAs16 and rAs14) with a hexahistidine tag at its C-terminus were expressed in yeast stain P. pastoris X-33 under induction with 0.5% methanol for 48–72 hours and then purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC), as described previously [35 (link)]. The purity of the recombinant proteins was determined by SDS–PAGE. The protein concentration was measured using BCA (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham) and Endotoxin clearance was confirmed using the Charles River Endosafe-PTS system (Charles River, Houston).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification and Endotoxin Removal of I53-50B.4PT1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endotoxin was removed from I53-50B.4PT1 during or after purification of the protein using a detergent wash during IMAC. The protein was immobilized on a 5 mL HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8, 500 mM NaCl, 0.75% CHAPS) and the column was washed with ∼10 CV of the equilibration buffer. I53-50B.4PT1 was eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 500 mM imidazole in equilibration buffer. Fractions containing I53-50B.4PT1 were concentrated in a 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff Vivaspin filter and dialyzed twice against equilibration buffer. Purified I53-50B.4PT1 pentamer was tested for endotoxin prior to assembly using a Charles River EndoSafe® PTS system, and measured concentrations were routinely below 100 EU/mL. Before formulation in SWE or AddaVax, protein preparations were again tested to be negative for endotoxin contamination by Chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay (Lonza).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Endotoxin Quantification in Purified BMP-4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The endotoxin content of the purified BMP-4 was determined by the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. The test was carried out using an Endosafe®-PTS™ system (Charles River Laboratories, USA) with a cartridge ranging from 0.1–10 EU ml−1 (EU = endotoxin unit) and following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification of Recombinant As37 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA coding for the full-length As37 was synthesized by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ) and then subcloned into the prokaryotic expression vector pET41a using NdeI and NotI sites to exclude the GST tag. The recombinant As37 protein (rAs37) was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) under induction with 1 mM IPTG. Soluble rAs37 with a hexahistidine-tag at its C-terminus was purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC), as described previously [31 (link)]. Contaminating endotoxin was removed by anion exchange chromatography with a Hitrap Q HP column (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL), while the purity of the recombinant protein was determined by SDS–PAGE and the protein concentration was measured using A280 absorption. Endotoxin clearance was confirmed using the Charles River Endosafe-PTS system (Charles River, Houston, TX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification and Characterization of FliC and CRM197

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STm phase 1 flagellin proteins (FliC) were purified as described from culture supernatants of CVD 1925 [20 (link)]. Recombinant CRM197 produced in E. coli was obtained from Fina Biosolutions (Rockville, MD). FliC and CRM197 were confirmed for integrity and removal of residual host cell protein by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining, and endotoxin levels by Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay using the Endosafe PTS system (Charles River Laboratories, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!