The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan

The E1L3N is a laboratory equipment product offered by Cell Signaling Technology. Its core function is to provide researchers with a reliable and efficient tool for their experiments, but a detailed description cannot be provided while maintaining an unbiased and factual approach.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

126 protocols using e1l3n

1

Multiplex IHC Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE full-face tissue sections from available tumors were dual IHC stained as detailed in supplementary text. All antibodies were initially tested on positive and negative control tissues with the Abs chosen for IHC detailed in the supplementary text file. Dual IHC stains were employed to examine the proximity of different lymphocyte subpopulations using the following markers: CD3 for total T cells, CD4+ and CD8+ for T-cell subsets, CD20 for total B cells (chosen for IHC instead of CD19 (used in flow cytometry experiments) because it has been shown to be more sensitive and specific for B cells in FFPE tissues58 (link)), CD23 for follicular dendritic cells and GC B cells, PD-1 and PD-L1. IHC staining for PD-L1 (B7-H1) was compared between several different Abs (polyclonal Abs Ab58810 (Abcam) and GTX104763 (GeneTex) and monoclonal Ab E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology)) and a non-commercial reference Ab kindly provided by Dr Lieping Chen's lab (murine IgG1, clone 5H159 (link)) with the best results achieved using E1L3N (control tissue staining shown in Fig. S1). Tumors with PD-L1 positivity on infiltrating immune cells were stained with CD68 (macrophage lineage marker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multisite Evaluation of PD-L1 Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression was evaluated by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and chromogenic IHC using five monoclonal antibodies (Suppl. Table 1), including both LDT and FDA-approved assays. For QIF, clones E1L3N (#13684, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), SP142 (#M4420, SpringBio), and SP263 (#790–4905, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) were assessed. For chromogenic IHC, automated systems were used for different clones using our own protocol for the LDT E1L3N (#13684, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) on multiple platforms, and protocols specified by corresponding manufacturer per the FDA labeling for 22C3 (#SK006, Dako) and 28–8 (#SK005, Dako) with the Dako Autostainer Link 48 Instrument (Dako). Similarly, on label protocols were used for FDA-approved assays; SP263 (#740–4907) and SP142 (#740–4859) both from Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. on the Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). For the multi-institutional comparison, twelve 5-µm sections per PD-L1 assay were cut from a block of Index TMA at Yale University and sent to 12 institutions for staining weekly during 6 consecutive weeks, running 2 slides per week with their clinical workload using the assay of choice for each institution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multisite Evaluation of PD-L1 Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 expression was evaluated by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and chromogenic IHC using five monoclonal antibodies (Suppl. Table 1), including both LDT and FDA-approved assays. For QIF, clones E1L3N (#13684, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), SP142 (#M4420, SpringBio), and SP263 (#790–4905, Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.) were assessed. For chromogenic IHC, automated systems were used for different clones using our own protocol for the LDT E1L3N (#13684, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) on multiple platforms, and protocols specified by corresponding manufacturer per the FDA labeling for 22C3 (#SK006, Dako) and 28–8 (#SK005, Dako) with the Dako Autostainer Link 48 Instrument (Dako). Similarly, on label protocols were used for FDA-approved assays; SP263 (#740–4907) and SP142 (#740–4859) both from Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. on the Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.). For the multi-institutional comparison, twelve 5-µm sections per PD-L1 assay were cut from a block of Index TMA at Yale University and sent to 12 institutions for staining weekly during 6 consecutive weeks, running 2 slides per week with their clinical workload using the assay of choice for each institution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biomarker Assessment of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), ki67, HER2, and PDL1 were performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples from biopsy. ER, PR, HER2, ki67 was detected using rabbit monoclonal antibodies SP1, EE2, 4B5 (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.), MIBI (Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd,). PDL1 was detected using the rabbit anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibody E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology, INC.).
ER and PR positive was defined as more than 1% of positive nuclear staining, ki67 level was recorded as a continuous value. HER2 assessment was conducted according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations26. PDL1 expression was assessed according to clinical trial criteria27 with minor modulation: membranous and cytoplasmic staining of tumor cell was counted for PDL1 tumor assessment; cytoplasmic staining of the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILS) was counted for PDL1 stromal assessment. PDL1 positive was specified as more than 1% of positive staining on the tumor cell. TILS positive was defined as more than 1% of the positive staining on TILS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides (3 slides per sample) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung adenocarcinoma tissues were used for the histologic evaluation of PKM2 and PD-L1 expression by IHC. Briefly, 4-μm tissue sections were deparaffinized and subjected to heat-induced antigen retrieval. The slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a rabbit anti-human PKM2 mAb (1:100; D78A4, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) or rabbit anti-human PD-L1 mAb (1:100; E1L3N, Cell Signaling Technology). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Envision™ Detection Kit, GK500705, Genetech), diaminobenzidine was used to visualize the staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tumor Molecular Profiling for ICI Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tumor samples from the MIND cohort were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) before ICI treatment [23 (link)]. The test method was performed on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center’s Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform, which includes somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and fusions of 341–468 genes most commonly associated with cancer. Based on NGS profiling in patients from the MIND cohort, we defined a TMB of ≥ 10 mutations (muts)/Mb as “high TMB” and TMB < 10 muts/Mb as “low TMB.” PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections using standard PD-L1 antibody (E1L3N; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA). The tumor cells were considered to have a high PD-L1 expression level when ≥ 50% of the cells stained positively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PD-1 and PD-L1 Immunostaining in Cancer Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-1 and PD-L1 immunostaining of samples from the NKI-AVL cohorts were performed on fresh-cut slides from FFPE blocks using an anti–PD-1 antibody (NAT105, Roche Diagnostics) and anti–PD-L1 antibody (22C3 DAKO, Agilent) on a BenchMark Ultra autostainer Instrument (Ventana Medical Systems) as described previously (7 (link)). PD-L1 immunostaining of samples from the CERTIM cohort was performed using a different anti–PD-L1 antibody (E1L3N, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog No. AB_2687655) on a Bond automat (Leica Biosystems) as described previously by Adam and colleagues (14 (link)).
PD-1 IHC slides were scanned at 20× magnification with a resolution of 0.50 per μm2 using an Aperio slide AT2 scanner (Leica Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive genomic profiling for immunotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WES and targeted NGS of tumor and blood samples were performed before ICB. DNA and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were separately extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded (FFPE) tumor masses and peripheral blood samples from the patients. The different sequencing assays, including WES and targeted NGS (MSK-IMPACT and OncoPlus), were performed as described in Supplementary Methods.
Based on the results of WES and targeted NGS profiling, we defined a high TMB as ≥20/Mb or total somatic nonsynonymous as ≥ 200, and low TMB as<20/Mb or total nonsynonymous mutations as<200. The E1L3N (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), 22C3 (DAKO), and 28-8 (DAKO) were used to determine the PD-L1 expression of tumor cells. Positive PD-L1 expression was defined as > 1% staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Profiling Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Immune Checkpoints in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recently, TILs, PD-1, and PD-L1 were investigated in this STS cohort [9 (link)]. We used those results to explore the relationship between VISTA and the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in STS. TILs between tumour cells were counted per high-power field (HPF) (400× magnification, field of view 0.237 mm2) in H&E-stained TMA slides, as routinely carried out by the pathologist.
As described previously [9 (link)], slides were pre-treated with heat and Target Retrieval solution (S1699, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) before incubation with the monoclonal primary anti-PD-1 mouse antibody (315M; 1:80; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA) for 60 min at room temperature. The Vectastain Elite ABC HRP Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and the chromogen DAB+ (Agilent) were used for detection and Hematoxylin (Vector Laboratories) for counterstaining.
For PD-L1 staining, slides were pre-treated with heat and the Epitope Retrieval Solution pH8 Novocastra (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) before incubation with the monoclonal primary anti-PD-L1 rabbit antibody (E1L3N; 1:50; Cell Signalling Technology) for 60 min at room temperature.
For CD3 staining, a monoclonal antibody raised in rabbit (SP7; 1:150; Zytomed, Berlin, Germany) was employed according to standard procedures. We used the SignalStain Boost IHC Detection Reagent (Cell Signalling Technology) and the chromogen DAB+ (Agilent) for detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of PD-L1, PD-1, and VISTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was carried out with antibodies directed against PD-L1 [dilution 1:100, E1L3N, Cell Signaling, Danvers, USA (catalog #13684)], PD-1 [dilution 1:100; clone MRQ-22, Cell Marque, Rocklin, USA (#315M-96)], and VISTA [1:500; clone D1L2G, Cell Signaling (#64953)]. Immunostaining of PD-L1 and PD-1 was performed with the autostainer Bond™ Max System (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The immunoreaction was visualized with the Bond™ Polymer Refine Detection Kit [brown labeling; Novocastra; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany (#DS9800)]. Immunostaining of VISTA was performed manually: Following antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH6), specimens were incubated with hydrogen peroxide block and Ultra V Block [both Thermo Scientific, Braunschweig, Germany (TA-125-HP and TP-125-HL)] to avoid unspecific reactions. The immunoreaction was visualized with the ImmPRESS-HRP-Universal–Antibody Polymer and the NovaRED substrate kit [both VectorLabs, Peterborough, United Kingdom (#SK-4800)]. Counterstaining was carried out with hematoxylin [Dr. K. Hollborn & Söhne GmbH & Co KG; Leipzig, Germany (#88663)].
Germinal centers of lymph follicles served as internal positive control for PD-L1 and PD-1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!