The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

74 protocols using anti flag

1

Co-IP and Western Blot Analysis of Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For co-IP and western blot analysis, 10 μg total plasmids were co-transfected into HEK293 cells, which were collected 20 h after transfection and lysed in IP buffer (1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.4, 50 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). After centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, supernatants were collected and incubated with Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose (Santa Cruz) together with monoclonal anti-Myc, anti-Flag, or anti-HA (Abcam). After 8 h at 4 °C with soft agitation, beads were washed four times with the IP buffer above-mentioned and resuspended in 75 µl 2× SDS loading buffer. The immunoprecipitates and whole-cell lysates (WCLs) were analyzed by IB with the indicated antibodies (Abs). For western blot analysis, WCL were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) and then blotted64 (link),65 (link).
The Abs used were as follows: anti-Myc (1:1000), anti-Flag (1:1000), anti-HA (1:1000), anti-Tubulin (1:1000), and anti-mCherry (1:1000) were from Abcam. Endogenous antibodies, anti-MyD88 (1:500), anti-IRAK4 (1:500), anti-TRAF6 (1:500), anti-TAK1 (1:500), anti-calpain2a (1:500) and anti-ubiquitin (1:500) were purchased from Boster Biological Technology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Yeast Two-Hybrid and Co-Immunoprecipitation Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Y2H assays, cDNA of each of the test genes was cloned into the yeast GAL4‐binding domain vector pGBKT7 and the GAL4‐activation domain vector pGADT7 (Clontech). The pGBKT7‐LAM and pGADT7 pair was used as a negative control and the pGBKT7‐53 and pGADT7 pair was used as a positive control. The pairs of Y2H plasmids were cotransformed into the yeast strain AH109. Transformants were grown on synthetic medium (SD) lacking Leu and Trp medium for 4 days, and then transferred to SD/−Ade−Leu−Trp−His medium and grown for 4 days at 30°C. At least three independent experiments were performed to confirm Y2H assay results (Liu et al., 2015).
A full‐length gene including its promoter sequence was amplified and cloned into the p1532‐GFP plasmid and pHZ‐FLAG plasmid and verified by DNA sequencing. The resultant plasmids were introduced into the protoplasts prepared from a ΔAatfb5 mutant. Transformants expressing fusion constructs were confirmed by western blotting with anti‐FLAG (Abcam) and anti‐GFP antibodies (Sigma). For Co‐IP assays, total proteins were extracted and incubated with the anti‐FLAG agarose (Sigma). Protein eluted from agarose was analysed by western blotting with anti‐GFP antibodies. The protein samples were also detected with monoclonal anti‐actin antibody (ABclonal Technology) as a control (Liu et al., 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Subcellular Localization of ECSIT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293-TLR4 cells were treated with or without LPS (100 ng/ml) for 45–60 min. Cytosol, mitochondria, and nucleus fractions were isolated using a Cell Fractionation Kit (ab109719; Abcam) according to the manufacturer's protocol. ECSIT localization was determined by immunoblotting analysis with anti-ECSIT antibody (Abcam). THP-1 cells were transiently transfected with Flag-tagged ECSIT wt or Flag-tagged K372A expression vector. At 36 h posttransfection, the cells were treated or not with LPS (100 ng/ml) for different times. The cytosol and nucleus fractions were isolated using a Cell Fractionation Kit (Abcam). p65, p50, and Flag-ECSIT wt or Flag-ECSIT K372A localization was detected by Western blotting with anti-p65 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p50 (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-Flag (Abcam) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoprecipitation of Id3-Flag Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PANC-1 cells were transfected with Id3-Flag plasmids using Reagent (Invitrogen). After 6 hours of incubation at 37°C, growth media was changed. Tamoxifen was added to concentration of 4uM after 24 hours. After incubation with tamoxifen for 48 hours, cells were harvested using cell lysis buffer [20mM TrisHCl (pH7.5, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 300mM NaCl, 0.5mM EDTA (pH8.0), 1mM Na3VO4, protease inhibitors) for immunoprecipitation. The FLAG fusion proteins were extracted using anti-FLAG M2 Magnetic Beads, proteins were electrophorectically separated on SDS-4–12% polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Scientific), transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (LI-COR Biosciences) blocked with Odyssey Blocking Buffer (LI-COR Biosciences) incubated at RT with anti-FLAG (Abcam) and anti-beta-actin (Abcam) as control. Secondary antibody detection was performed with IRDye conjugates (LI-COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Co-Immunoprecipitation of GFP and FLAG Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GFP and FLAG fusion constructs were transformed in pairs or singly into Fol or B05.10 cells. Transformants expressing the fusion constructs were verified by PCR and Western blot assays. For Co‐IP assays, mycelia of the strains were collected and ground in liquid nitrogen, and the powder was resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP‐40) with 2 mM PMSF and proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The supernatant lysates were then incubated with anti‐GFP agarose (KT Health) at 4°C for 2 h with gentle shaking. Finally, the eluted proteins were detected with anti‐FLAG (Abcam) and anti‐GFP antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from cells grown in complete medium and the supernatants collected from 24-h serum-deprived cells [15 (link)]. Proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes, which were probed with the following antibodies overnight at 4°C: anti-E-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-Snail1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), as well as anti-Flag, anti-Vimentin, IST-9, anti-FN, anti-Ki-67, and anti-β-actin (Abcam Ltd., Cambridge, MA, USA) antibodies. Immunocomplexes were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence blotting kit (Applygen Technology Inc., Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Co-Immunoprecipitation of RhHDA19 and RhTPL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Co-IP assays, Agrobacterium harboring 35S:RhHDA19-GFP was co-infiltrated with 35S:RhTPL-FLAG into N. benthamiana leaves, 35S:RhMYB73-GFP was co-infiltrated with 35S:RhTPL-FLAG into N. benthamiana leaves, and co-infiltration of 35S:GFP and 35S:RhTPL-FLAG was used as a negative control. After 3 days, total proteins were extracted using extraction buffer87 (link). The supernatant was first incubated with GFP-Trap® Agarose Beads (1:200 dilution; Chromotek, No. gta) and then analyzed by immunoblot using anti-FLAG (1:2500 dilution; Abcam, No. ab1162,) and anti-GFP (1:2000 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich, No. G1544,) antibodies. The primers used in Co-IP are listed in Supplementary Data 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of MoRac1-GFP Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MoRac1- GFP construct was generated and transformed into wild-type 70–15 and ΔMofap7 mutant complemented with MoFap7-3×FLAG. Total proteins were extracted by lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100) and incubated with anti-GFP agarose (ChromoTek). Proteins bound to agarose were eluted after three times low salt and one time high salt buffer. Total proteins and elution proteins were detected with anti-FLAG (HuaAn) and anti-GFP (Abcam) antibodies using the ECL Supersignal system (Pierce, Rockford, IL) by western blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Expression Analysis via Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA lysis buffer was used to extract protein from samples, which was then quantitated via BCA assay. Equivalent protein amounts were then separated using 10% SDS-PAGE gels, followed by transfer onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were immunoblotted with the following antibodies: Anti-β-Actin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-cyclin A2 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-CDC20 (Abcam, USA); and anti-FLAG (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Protein bands were visualized using corresponding secondary antibodies, and then chemiluminescence was utilized to detect protein bands. Luciferase activity assay and cell cycle analysis were conducted as in previous studies [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Co-Immunoprecipitation for Protein-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Co-IP was performed as previously described [27 (link)]. Briefly, the cells were lysed and centrifuged for the supernatant. One tenth of the supernatant was retained for the immunoblot of input, and the rest was incubated with anti-STAT3 (Abcam, ab119352), anti-GNAS (Proteintech, 10,150–2-AP), anti-Flag (Abcam, ab205606), anti-Myc (Abcam, ab32), or rabbit/mouse IgG at 4 °C overnight, followed by further incubation with 10 μl of protein A-agarose beads (Cell Signaling Technology) for another 4 h. The bound proteins were subjected to washing three times for 30 min each and then eluted by boiling for 5 min in the loading buffer. Immunocomplexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and Western blotting, and the gel was then stained with the Fast Silver Stain Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Proteins specially interacting with STAT3 were identified by reverse-phase liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (ACQUITY UPLC UPLC-QTOF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!