The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using 16 high sensitivity str kit

1

STR Profiling of CTC Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STR DNA fingerprinting was performed in FACS-enriched REPLI-g WGA amplified CTC subsets using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (Cat # DC2100). The STR profiles were compared to online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN) of 2455 known profiles; along with 2556 know profiles. The samples were analyzed at Characterized Cell Line Core (CCLC) facility at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mycoplasma and DNA Fingerprinting in Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cultures were tested for mycoplasma contamination each quarter by PCR (the Universal Mycoplasma detection kit, ATCC, 30-1012K) and were confirmed mycoplasma-free throughout the duration of this study. Short-tandem repeat (STR) DNA fingerprinting was performed on DNA extracted from cell lines and on PDX model tumors the Cytogenetics and Cell Authentication Core (CCAC) at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (Catalog # DC2100) was used for fingerprinting analysis, and profiles were compared to online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Cell Culture Maintenance Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Platinum-E retroviral packaging cell line, MEL 526 tumor line, and primary melanoma tumor cell line #2549, as well as B16F10, and B16OVA were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gemini bio product), 10 mM HEPES (Gibco™), 10 mM Penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco™), and 10 mM Glutamine (Gibco™), selenium-transferrin-insulin (Gibco™), and 0.05 mM Beta-mercaptoethanol (Gibco™) as previously described (2 (link), 34 (link)). Platinum-E retro packing cell line was purchased from Cellbiolabs. MEL 526 tumor line was obtained from Dr Steven A. Rosenberg at the National Cancer Institute. Autologous primary melanoma tumor cell line #2549 was generated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from a tumor sample of a patient enrolled on an ongoing adoptive T cell therapy study. The cell line #2549 was last authenticated on 03/24/2015 by STR DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (Catalog #DC2100). The STR profiles were compared to online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN) of 2455 known profiles; along with the MD Anderson Characterized Cell Line Core (CCLC) database of 2556 know profiles. The STR profiles matched known DNA fingerprint of patient’s PBMCs. No authentication was performed in all other cell lines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Establishing and Characterizing Renal Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RCC4, A-498, 786-O, CaKi-1, TK-10 and SN12C cell lines were obtained from ATCC. All cell lines were validated by STR DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (Catalog # DC2100). The STR profiles were compared to online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN) of 2455 known profiles; along with the MD Anderson Characterized Cell Line Core (CCLC) database of 2556 know profiles. The STR profiles matched known DNA fingerprints or were unique. All cell lines were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum. 786-O stable cell lines expressing control shRNA or PD-L1 shRNA (Thermo Scientific, V2LHS_53668) were infected with lentiviral particles and selected in medium containing 2μg/ml puromycin. Cells were lysed in RIPA butter (50 mM Tric-Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS) for immunoblot analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Line Identity Validation by STR Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell line identity was validated by the MD Anderson Characterized Cell Line Core facility (supported by the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant, CA016672) with STR DNA fingerprinting, which used the Promega 16 High-Sensitivity STR Kit (Catalog # DC2100). The STR profiles were compared with online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN) of 2455 known profiles and with the MD Anderson Characterized Cell Line Core database of 2556 known profiles. The KTC1 cell line STR profile was matched with a previously published profile [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3ip1, HeyA8, OVCAR-8, OVCA-432) were maintained in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.1% gentamicin sulfate (GeminibBioproducts, Calabases, CA, USA; refs 47 (link), 48 (link)). The A498 and RCC4 cell lines were kindly provided by Dr Eric Jonasch (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center) and were maintained in DMEM-high glucose supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.1% gentamicin. The RF24 cells were maintained in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, sodium pyruvate, MEM vitamins, L-glutamine, and MEM non-essential amino acids. 10T1/2 pericyte-like cells were maintained in DMEM-high glucose supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.1% gentamicin. All the cell lines were routinely tested to confirm the absence of Mycoplasma. Cell lines were validated by Short Tandem Repeat (STR) DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit. The STR profiles were compared with online search databases (DSMZ/ATCC/JCRB/RIKEN) of 2,455 known profiles; along with the MD Anderson Characterized Cell Line Core database of 2,556 known profiles. The STR profiles matched known DNA fingerprints or were unique. All the in vitro experiments were conducted with 60–80% confluent cultures. For cell growth assays, the cells were plated in six-well plates in triplicate and were counted each day for 6 days using a Beckman Coulter cell counter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oncogene-driven NSCLC cell lines for microenvironment study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used 6 human oncogene-driven NSCLC cell lines, all provided by Dr. Adi F. Gazdar (The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) and co-author (JDM). For a control, we utilized the nonmalignant human bronchial epithelial cell line HBEC3KT (15 (link)). The identities of all cell lines were confirmed by short tandem repeat (STR) DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit. We used normal lung fibroblasts (NLFs) obtained from a normal lung specimen and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) obtained from a lung cancer specimen in co-cultures to mimic the tumor microenvironment. These fibroblasts were used in passages 5 through 7.
Targeted inhibitors selumetinib (AZD6244) (16 (link)), erlotinib, crizotinib, filgotinib (GLP0634) (17 (link)), momelotinib (CYT387) (18 (link)), and stattic (19 (link)) were purchased from Selleckchem. Recombinant human (rh) IL6, OSM, and LIF proteins were purchased from EMD Millipore.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiple Myeloma Cell Line Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JJN3 cells were obtained from DSMZ (ACC 541). KMS11 cells were obtained from JCRB Cell Bank (JCRB1179). MM1R (CRL-2975), H929 (CRL-3580) and RPMI-8226 (CCL-155) cells were obtained from ATCC. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) were kindly provided by Dr. Michael Andreeff. Mycoplasma testing was routinely performed on all cell lines, and cell identity was validated by STR DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit. Primary BM samples from patients with MM relapsed disease after PI-based therapy and referred to the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center or the Department of Medicine and Surgery at the University of Parma were obtained after written informed consent with the approval of the institutions’ respective Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The consent to publish the exact age and sex of the patients included in the study was obtained by the Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center or the Department of Medicine and Surgery at the University of Parma. Patient characteristics are included in Supplementary Table 2. BM samples from healthy donors were obtained from AllCells.
The authors acknowledge the limitation of using MM cell lines to perform the experiments described in the manuscript.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Establishment of Renal Medullary Carcinoma Patient-Derived Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animal studies, including housing, care, euthanasia methods and experimental protocols, were approved by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Animal Care and Use Committee, adhering to relevant guidelines. Two xenograft models were developed from patient‐derived tumours. The first (RMC2X) was derived from the same RMC primary tumour specimen as the cell line RMC2C using previously described methodology.32 A primary tumour sample was implanted orthotopically and subcutaneously and allowed to grow for three serial passages within SCID mice (Figure S1A). After the third passage, the xenograft tumour was compared to the primary tumour using STR DNA profiling to confirm the xenograft tumour maintained patient‐derived tumour tissue using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (catalogue #DC2100)25 (Supporting Information S1). A second PDX model (RMC32X) was developed in a similar fashion. RMC32X was derived from the nephrectomy specimen of a black male patient with sickle cell trait who had received platinum therapy prior to nephrectomy; thus, the PDX served as a model of a platinum‐experienced tumour. Both primary tumours from which the two PDX models were derived have been previously molecularly characterised.8
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Establishing RCC cell lines with genetic knockdowns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RCC cell lines (786O, RCC4, and Renca) were obtained from ATCC and were validated by short tandem repeat (STR) DNA fingerprinting using the Promega 16 High Sensitivity STR Kit (catalog # DC2100). Human RCC cell lines and Renca cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. 786-O (RRID:CVCL_1051), RCC4 (RRID:CVCL_0498), or Renca (RRID:CVCL_2174) cells infected with lentivirus expressing shRNA against SETD2, cGAS, or IRF3 were selected in medium containing 2 μg/ml puromycin. Lentiviral particles expressing control shRNA (SHC002V), human cGAS shRNA (TRCN0000128706 and TRCN0000148694), human IRF3 shRNA (TRCN0000005919 and TRCN0000352624), or mouse Setd2 shRNA (TRCN0000238434) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Human control shRNA (V3LHS_318943) and SETD2 shRNA (V2LHS_53398 and V2LHS_53401) were purchased from Dharmacon. Cell lines were verified as mycoplasma negative by regular testing with the Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit MycoAlert Kit (BioVision).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!