The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

53 protocols using coreldraw x6

1

Dendritic Morphometry Analysis of Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neurolucida Explorer software was used to calculate soma area, number of primary dendrites and number of dendritic branches, total dendrite length, dendritic surface area, dendritic volume, and spine density. Analysis of dendritic branch number, total dendritic length, dendritic surface area, and dendritic volume were carried out only on non-truncated dendrites. Statistical comparisons were made using two-tailed Student’s t-tests. Reconstructed neurones were saved as tiff images and imported into Corel Draw X6 (Corel Inc., Mountainview, CA) for illustrations.
Camera lucida drawings of selected neurones were made with the aid of a Zeiss Standard microscope (Thornwood, NY) equipped with a drawing tube and a Zeiss X63 oil-immersion objective (N.A. = 1.25). Neurones and section borders were traced with a pencil onto white paper. The drawings were retraced using Rapidograph Ultradraw Waterproof ink (Koh-i-noor, Bloomsbury, NJ), digitally scanned as tiff files and imported into Corel Draw X6 for the illustrations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detailed Electrophysiological Analysis of Ion Channel Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed and graphed using Fitmaster software (HEKA Elektronik GmbH), Igor Pro 6 (Wavemetrics), Prism 7 (GraphPad Software), and Corel Draw X6 (Corel Corporation). Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean ± SD with the difference of the means ± standard error of difference and the confidence interval of the difference given in the figure legends. For analysis of the I848E mutant (and I848E and β1- and β2-cotransfection), a digital offline filter of 3 kHz was used in order to reduce noise, as the current amplitude was strongly reduced. All other analyses were performed with no digital offline filter.
For statistical testing, groups larger than two were compared by a one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Groups of two were compared by unpaired t test or Mann–Whitney test depending on the normal distribution. Significance in every case at least p <0.05, represented by ∗.
We conducted a post hoc power analysis of all statistically tested data using G∗Power 3.1.9.6 (HHU Düsseldorf). Power (1 − β err prob.) for all groups was >0.99 unless otherwise stated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented as means ± standard deviation. All experiments were repeated at least three times with independent biological replicates. For assessing cell vitality, apoptosis and gene expression, individual biological experiments were performed as duplicates, respectively. Outliers were determined via Grubb's test. Group analyzes were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by GraphPad Prism 6.07 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). p Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Final arrangement of the figures was performed using CorelDraw® X6 version 16.0.0.707.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Caspase Activity Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caspase activities were measured using the Caspase-Glo®8 (#G8201) and Caspase-Glo®3/7 (#G8093) assays from Promega, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal volumes of cell suspension, and Caspase-Glo® reagent were placed in 96-well plates and incubated for 45 min at room temperature before luminescence was monitored using a Perkin Elmer Wallac microplate reader. Cell numbers were calculated at time of harvest and used to normalize the assay results. Figures were prepared using CorelDRAW X6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopy Analysis of Animal Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Leica DM 1000 epifluorescence microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for gross morphological analysis of 318 animals. 64 of them were selected for detailed examinations using a Leica TCS SP5 II confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Optical sections between 0.2 and 0.5 μm of the whole-mounts were generated and digitally merged into maximum projections. In order to depict the 3-dimensionality of the specimens and to accentuate the regions of interests, the confocal stacks were analyzed with the 3D-reconstruction software Imaris 7.3 (Bitplane, Zürich, Switzerland). Adjustment and optimization of contrast and brightness as well as the conversion into black and white images was performed with Photoshop CS 6 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). Line drawings were generated with Corel Draw X 6 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gait analysis in transgenic Parkinson's mouse model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software and were visualized using GraphPad Prism and CorelDRAW X6 software. Pearson's chi-squared and Mann–Whitney test revealed no sex- and age-related differences between MSA patients and controls nor differences in group size and sex between MBP29-hα-syn mice and control mice. To determine normal distribution of parameters, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used. Even though most of the parameters were normally distributed, the Mann–Whitney test (non-parametric, unpaired) was chosen for all analyses due to low sample sizes. To evaluate disease-related progression in gait parameters of MBP29-hα-syn mice at 8 and 16 weeks of age, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-parametric, paired) was performed. All parameters expressed in length units were normalized to the mean bodyweight of all mice at each time point to avoid confounding effects of bodyweight on gait parameters due to mixed-sex cohorts, weight gain during gait analysis, and bodyweight differences between sex, transgenic mice and controls (Additional file 1. Table S1). Unless indicated differently, all analyses are expressed as mean + standard deviation. Effect size r was calculated (according to Rosenthal 1991 [34 (link)]) using the z-score (obtained from Mann–Whitney test). P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Cryopreservation of Brain-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolation and cryopreservation of the brain-infiltrating lymphocytes (BILs) have been previously described (21 (link)). In brief, fresh brain tissue was finely minced in dissociation solution (HBSS with 20 mM HEPES pH7.0, 5 mM glucose, and 50 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin), then digested overnight at room temperature in dissociation solution containing 0.5 mg/ml Type IV collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewod, NJ, USA) and 5% filtered human serum (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA, USA). BILs were obtained by fractionation on a 30%: 70% Percoll® (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) step gradient in RPMI containing 20 mM HEPES. BILs were stained with the following antibodies: APC-efluor® 780-conjugated CD3 (clone UCHT1; eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), PE/Cy7-conjugated CD4 (clone SK3; eBioscience Inc.), PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated CD8 (clone RPA-T8; eBioscience Inc.), APC-conjugated TCR αβ (clone IP26; eBioscience Inc.), FITC-conjugated TCR γδ (clone B1.1; eBioscience Inc), and PE-conjugated CD103 (clone B-Ly7; eBioscience Inc). Data were acquired on an analytical LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), and were analyzed with FlowJo software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, OR, USA); histograms were exported into CorelDrawX6 (Corel Corporation, Ottawa, ON, Canada). Statistical analysis and graphing utilized R-project programs (www.r-project.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Expression Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed and visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0 and CorelDraw X6 software. Shapiro–Wilk test was performed for determination of normal distribution of expression levels and cell counts. Welch’s t-test was conducted for determination of statistical significance. If no Gaussian distribution was determined, statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney–U test. Unless otherwise stated, all graphs represent mean values and standard deviation. P values were defined as statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Investigating Biochemical Markers in Diseases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results were interpreted statistically using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test and the Mann–Whitney U-Test. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. All graphics were created with GraphPad 8.0. Figures were created with CorelDRAW X6. The brightness, contrast, and intensity of the depicted images were adapted for better perceptibility. Adaptations were made to the entire picture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscope Image Acquisition and Handling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopic images were acquired with a Zeiss AxioCam HRc digital camera (4164 × 3120 pixels; Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Jena, Germany) attached to a Zeiss Axiophot microscope (Zeiss) and AxioVision software (version 4.8.2; Zeiss) using a 10x and 100x objective. The final figures were assembled using Corel Photo-Paint X6 and Corel Draw X6 (both versions 16.1.0.843; Corel, Ottawa, Canada). Only minor adjustments of contrast and brightness were made, without altering the appearance of the original images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!