The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism five

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism five is a graphing and data analysis software developed by GraphPad. It provides tools for creating publication-quality graphs, performing statistical analysis, and managing data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

50 protocols using prism five

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed with SPSS 22 software (IBM) and GraphPad Prism five software (GraphPad Software). Statistical significance between groups was tested by two-tailed one-sample t-test, two-tailed unpaired t-test, paired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher’s exact test, χ2 test, one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. All the detailed test methods, the number of experiments and p values are listed in the source data. All data are presented as mean ±SEM, and the difference was recognized as significant when p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The differences between the obtained values (mean ± SEM, n = 10) were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison using Graph Pad Prism five software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The differences were considered statistically significant when p <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are represented as mean ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were made using two-tailed Students t-test or one-way/two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-test for multiple comparisons. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001). All graphs and statistics were performed using the statistical package GraphPad Prism five for Windows (GraphPad Software, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± S.E.M of 3−5 independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism five software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post-comparison test (>two groups) or two sample t-test (two groups) was used to compare the mean differences among the groups. Data were considered to be statistically significant at (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, or ****p < 0.0001).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All assays were performed in at least three independent experiments (unless specified). GraphPad Prism five software (GraphPad Software) was used for statistical analyses. Statistical tests used are described in each result section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bioluminescence and RNA-seq Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bioluminescence data were analyzed with the Actimetrics LumiCycle analysis software (Actimetrics LTD, Wilmette, IL). RNA-seq data and qPCR data analysis were performed using RStudio, GraphPad Prism five and Excel 2016. Panther analyses were performed using the PANTHER version 12.0 released on 10.07.2017. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant for (*) p-value <0.05, (**) p-value <0.01, and (***) p-value <0.001. Exact p-values and raw data for Figures 2 and 3 are listed in Supplementary file 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Transcriptomic Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
R software 3.6.3 (https://www.R-project.org/) and GraphPad Prism five were used for statistical analysis. Student’s t test was applied to calculate the p-value of continuous variables. When data were not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon test was used. Fisher’s exact test was performed to compare categorical variables. Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare the relationship of two variables. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant unless otherwise specified. The R package pheatmap (v1.0.12) was used to scale and visualize the expression of ac4C-DEGs between tumor and normal tissues, and stemness-related genes and score of immune-related pathways between the ac4Cscore-high and ac4Cscore-low groups. The R package ggalluvial (v0.12.3) was used to visualize the attribution of immune subtype to individual patients in different ac4Cscore groups. The R package corrplot (v0.84) was applied to draw the correlation of ac4Cscore and immune signatures. The R package circlize (v0.4.14) was utilized for ring heatmap (Gu et al., 2014 (link)). The R package ggradar (v0.2) was used to display the distribution of immune cells. The R package timeROC (v0.4) was used for receiver operating characteristic analysis and to quantify the area under the curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way and two-way analysis of variances were used to compare the mean values. Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism five statistical software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The level of significance was set to P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Biomarker Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. All data were analyzed using one way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as significant. All the statistical analyses were performed using graph pad prism five software (Graph Pad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Survival Analysis of Bladder Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from at least three independent experiments were presented as the mean ± SD. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) or GraphPad Prism five software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The significance of difference between two/multiple groups was evaluated using Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used for the analysis of correlation between clinicopathological features and LINC01296 expressions in bladder cancer patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used for the analysis of survival rates, while P-values were calculated by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between clinical features, genetic features and overall survival (OS) using a Cox proportional hazard model. P<0.05 indicated significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!