The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using elyra 7 microscope

1

Imaging EGFP-Clathrin in TMEM127-KO Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMEM127-KO or Mock-KO cells stably expressing EGFP-tagged clathrin light chain were grown on #1.5 coverslips. Cells were fixed in PFA and mounted in Prolong Glass mounting medium (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA). Cells were imaged with a Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 Oil immersion objective on an ELYRA7 microscope in lattice SIM mode (Carl Zeiss, White Plains, NY). A 488 nm laser was passed through a 23 μm grating and used to excite EGFP. Fluorescence emission was collected on a sCMOS camera (PCO, Kelheim, Germany) through a 495-550 nm bandpass emission filter. 15 illumination phases were collected with an exposure time of 100 ms each. Voxel dimensions were 0.063 nm, 0.063 nm, and 0.110 nm (X, Y, Z), respectively. Z-stacks of approximately 750 nm were acquired for each field of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

TMEM127-KO Cells Imaged by Lattice SIM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMEM127-KO or Mock-KO cells stably expressing EGFP-CLC were grown on #1.5 coverslips. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and mounted in Prolong Glass mounting medium (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were imaged with a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 Oil immersion objective on an ELYRA7 microscope in lattice SIM mode (Carl Zeiss, White Plains, NY, USA). A 488 nm laser was passed through a 23 µm grating and used to excite EGFP. Fluorescence emission was collected on a sCMOS camera (PCO, Kelheim, Germany) through a 495–550 nm bandpass emission filter. 15 illumination phases were collected with an exposure time of 100 ms each. Voxel dimensions were 0.063, 0.063, and 0.110 nm (X, Y, Z), respectively. Z-stacks of approximately 750 nm were acquired for each field of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lattice SIM Imaging of mEmerald-TOMM20

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days before imaging, HeLa cells were plated (2.5 × 104 cells per well) in a four-well chamber and incubated overnight. After 16 h, the cells were transfected with plasmids encoding mEmerald–TOMM20 using FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega), according to manufacturer’s protocol, and incubated overnight. The following day, the cells were visualized via Lattice SIM imaging on a Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope. The following settings were used: laser power of 0.4% (488 nm, estimated at 0.005 kW cm–2), field of view of 80.14 μm × 80.14 μm, camera exposure time of 40 ms, acquisition of 13 phases per frame for SIM reconstruction, interval time of 100 ms between each frame, acquisition of 500 frames in total over 297 s, an LBF 405/488/561/642 splitter and an SBS LP 560 filter set. Cells were incubated in DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2. SIM reconstruction was performed with Zeiss Zen Black software. Fluorescence intensity was obtained from randomly picked 3 μm × 3 μm regions using ImageJ and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. The signal intensity half-life was obtained by performing a nonlinear regression of the exponential decay function using OriginLab OriginPro 2022b.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lattice SIM Imaging of Mitochondria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days before imaging, HeLa cells were plated (2.5 × 104 cells per well) in a four-well chamber and incubated overnight. After 16 h, the cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Halo-TOMM20 using FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega), according to manufacturer’s protocol, and incubated overnight. The following day, the cells were incubated with 600 μl of 2 μM SiR-CA in DMEM ph(–) for 1 h at 37 °C and CO2 and washed three times with 600 μl of DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were visualized via Lattice SIM imaging on a Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope. The following settings were used: laser power of 0.4% (488 nm, estimated at 0.005 kW cm–2), field of view of 80.14 μm × 80.14 μm, camera exposure time of 40 ms, acquisition of 13 phases per frame for SIM reconstruction, interval time of 100 ms between each frame, acquisition of 500 frames over 297 s, an LBF 405/488/561/642 beam splitter and an SBS LP 560 filter set. Cells were incubated with DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2. SIM reconstruction was performed with Zeiss Zen Black software. Fluorescence intensity was obtained from randomly picked 3 μm × 3 μm regions using ImageJ and plotted using Graphpad Prism 8.4.3. The signal intensity half-life was obtained by performing a nonlinear regression of the exponential decay function using OriginLab OriginPro 2022b.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-Molecule Labeling and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before seeding, four-well LabTek II (Nunc) chambers were treated by sonication for 15 min in 1 M KOH, rinsed three times with deionized water, sterilized with 100% ethanol and air dried overnight in a biological safety cabinet. HeLa cells were seeded onto pretreated plates at a density of 3.0 × 104 cells per well and incubated overnight at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The following day, the cells were labeled with 600 μl of 75 nM MAO-N3 in DMEM ph(–) for 40 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2, washed three times with 600 μl of DMEM ph(–), incubated with 600 μl of 0.6 μM HMDS655-DBCO in DMEM ph(–) for 20 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and washed again six times with DMEM ph(–) and 10% FBS for 10 min each at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Finally, the medium was exchanged with 600 μl of DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 1% FBS, 100 μM Trolox and 500 μM sodium ascorbate. The sample was subsequently visualized via SMLM imaging on an inverted Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope equipped with a Plan-Apo ×63/1.4-NA oil immersion lens (40% laser power for the 642-nm laser, 60.57° TIRF mirror angle, TIRF-uHP mode, 2.5-ms exposure time for each frame and 6,000 frames obtained in 36 s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Live-cell Imaging and Microscope Settings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The live-cell data were acquired from different systems, and the image’s effective pixel size was adjusted to ~100 nm. Specifically, the data shown in Figs. 4, 5, 7, and the corresponding supplementary figures were acquired from a commercial Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope in HILO mode with a 60×/1.46 oil objective. For a FOV size of 25.6 × 25.6 µm2, we recorded dual-color live-cell images at 100 Hz with 15 W/cm2 illuminance for 5000 time points (Figs. 4, 5, and 7, and the corresponding supplementary figures) except for the data in Fig. 7a which is recorded at 0.5 Hz for 200 time points and Supplementary Fig. 29 which is recorded at 1 Hz and for 250 time points. And for whole-cell imaging with a FOV size of 60 × 50 µm2, due to the data transmission limitation of the system, we used a 20 Hz imaging speed for 5000 time point recordings (Fig. 5a); in this process, the illumination intensity was reduced to 3 W/cm2. The data in Fig. 6 was acquired with a Zeiss SP8 confocal microscope at 3 W/cm2 illuminance with a 63×/1.4 oil objective. We recorded 300 time points at 0.4 Hz for a FOV of 51.2 × 51.2 µm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing FLAG-ST-CCR5 Receptor Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FLAG-ST-CCR5 expressing cells, transfected with βarr2-GFP, were plated on MatTek plates 72 hr before imaging. Cells were stained with the anti-FLAG M2-Cy3 (5 min) and incubated in the presence or absence of 3 nM PSC-RANTES in DMEM/1%BSA medium for the indicated time. Cells were put on ice and fixed with paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4% at 4 °C for 40 min before three washes in PBS. Experiments were performed using a Elyra 7 microscope (Carl Zeiss Gmbh) equipped with two sCMOS cameras PCO Edge 4.2, and using an alpha Plan Apo 63 x/1.46 oil objective, a 488 nm (500 mW) and a 561 nm (500 mW) laser line, and a quad band filter coupled to BP 495–550 or BP 570–620 filters. All TIRF images analyses were performed using ICY software and the spot detector and the colocalization studio plugins. The number of spot detected per cell was normalized to the size of the cell surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structured Illumination Microscopy of Chlorophyll and GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired with an Elyra 7 microscope (Zeiss) with a Lattice Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM2) module. Cell suspensions were spotted on a slide and covered with a 170 ± 5 µm high precision cover glass (Marienfeld). A Plan-apochromat 63×/1.4 DIC M27 objective lens was used. Chl and GFP were excited with a 488 nm laser with an exposure time of 100 ms. Fluorescence emission channels were separated with a 560 nm beam-splitter. Emission wavelengths were defined by a 495–550 nm bandpass filter for GFP and a 655 nm long-pass filter for Chl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Mitochondria with Live-Cell SIM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days before imaging, HeLa cells were plated (2.5 × 104 cells per well) in a four-well chamber and incubated overnight. After 16 h, the cells were transfected with plasmids encoding mEmerald–TOMM20 using FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Promega), according to manufacturer’s protocol, and incubated overnight. The following day, the cells were labeled with 600 μl of 75 nM MAO-N3 in DMEM ph(–) for 1 h, washed three times with 600 μl of DMEM ph(–), incubated with 600 μl of 0.6 μM SiR-DBCO in DMEM ph(–) for 1 h and washed again (six times for 10 min each with DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 10% FBS). The sample was subsequently visualized via Lattice SIM imaging on a Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope. The following parameters were used: laser powers of 6% (642 nm, estimated at 0.04 kW cm–2) and 3% (488 nm, estimated at 0.04 kW cm–2), field of view of 80.14 μm × 80.14 μm, camera exposure time of 40 ms, acquisition of 13 phases for SIM reconstruction, an LBF 405/488/561/642 beam splitter and a BP 495–550 + LP 655 filter set. Cells were incubated with DMEM ph(–) supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C and 5% CO2. SIM reconstruction was performed with Zeiss Zen Black software. Nonlinear regression for Gaussian and Lorentzian fitting of peaks from line profiles was performed using OriginLab OriginPro 2022b and plotted using Graphpad Prism 8.4.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Monitoring UPR Activation in C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine UPRmt or UPRER activation, strains carrying hsp‐6p::GFP or hsp‐4p::GFP were utilized. Synchronized worms were visualized at of day 1 of adulthood. For the fluorescence imaging, worms were anesthetized with M9 buffer containing 20 mM sodium azide, and an Olympus BX63 microscope was used. Worm GFP intensity was then quantified with ImageJ software. In SAM, methionine, and homocysteine supplementation experiments, P0 worms were grown on empty vector or RNAi bacteria from hatching. F1 eggs were then transferred on plates seeded with UV‐killed bacteria and supplemented with the vehicle, 2 mM SAM (Sigma‐Aldrich, A2408), 2 mM L‐methionine (Sigma‐Aldrich, M5308), and 2 mM homocysteine (Sigma‐Aldrich, 69453). Day 1 adult F1 worms were then scored for GFP intensity.
For monitoring the subcellular localization of SLC‐25A26::GFP or TRMT‐10C.2::GFP, worms were mounted on 2% agarose pads with 50 mM tetramisole (Sigma, T1512). Images were acquired using Zeiss Elyra 7 microscope and Zeiss LSM 900 laser scanning confocal microscope, respectively.
For Mitotracker Red staining, L4 worms carrying TRMT‐10C.2::GFP were cultured on UV‐killed bacteria with 2 μM Mitotracker (Cell Signaling Technology, 8778) for 24 h. Worms were subsequently transferred to stain‐free plates for 30 min to eliminate the excess stain in the gut lumen before proceeding with image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!