The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using agilent mx3005p qpcr system

1

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis in ATDC5 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from ATDC5 cells after treatment with LPS and Tan IIA (or erastin) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), digested with RNA-free DNase I (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan), quantitated with a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, CA, USA), and used to synthesize cDNA with M-MLV and Oligo(dT)16 (TaKaRa). Subsequently, qRT‒PCR was performed in triplicate using a OneStep RT‒PCR kit (QIAGEN, Duesseldorf, Germany) on an Agilent Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent) under the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, 38 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 59°C for 25 s. Gene expression was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method [23 (link)] after normalization to β-actin. All primers are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RT-qPCR Validation of High-Throughput Small-RNA Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results of high-throughput analyses (small-RNA sequencing or PCR arrays) were validated by RT-qPCR on the same plasma samples used for sequencing (n = 8 heifers/group). cDNA was generated as described above and diluted for use in 10 μL qPCR reactions using Qiagen SYBR Green kits in an Agilent Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies, USA). Raw fluorescence data were processed using Agilent MxPro software. A fluorescence threshold of 0.1 was set for all experiments. The amplification efficiency generally ranged between 85 % - 115 %, with R2 > 0.85. Cq-values and gene expression data were processed using Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, USA). Specifically, data were log2 transformed and tested for normality as described for the small-RNA sequencing data, and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests (non-parametric) were used to generate P values for the comparisons of miRNA levels between non-pregnant (NP) and pregnant groups (P16 or P24).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from each cell line was extracted using the Universal RNA Purification kit (EurX) and purified RNA was digested with DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove any traces of genomic DNA contamination. RNA integrity was assessed using RNA 6000 Nano chip and Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer and subjected to reverse transcription using RevertAid™ Premium cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Oligo (dT)18 primer and random hexamer primer were used for first-strand cDNA synthesis. Gene-specific primer pairs for quantitative PCR were obtained from Real Time Primers LLC (Elkins Park, PA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using Agilent Mx3005P QPCR System with Brilliant III SYBR Green Master mix (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Levels of target genes were normalized to HPRT1 gene. Experiments were carried out in duplicate for each experimental condition. Data were analyzed with Stratagene MX Pro software (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping Mosquito Insecticide Resistance Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted according to the LIVAK method [40 (link)] from individual An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes from each site. TaqMan assays with two labelled fluorochromes probes FAM and HEX were used to screen for the L995F/S (previously referred to as L1014F/S) kdr mutations [7 (link)] and, the ace-1R G280S (previously referred to as Ace1-G119S) mutation. Reactions were performed on the Agilent MX3005P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies). The genotype was determined from the fluorescence profiles and bi-directional scatter plots generated in the MX3005P software. The PCR condition was 95 °C for 10 min (1 cycle) following by 40 cycles of 95 °C at 10 s and 60 °C at 45 s, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA templates were extracted with RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer's protocol. Residual DNA was removed by DNase I (Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania). One microgram of DNA-free total RNA from each sample was subsequently reverse transcribed to cDNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) with random hexamer primer. The expression levels of PCR-positive genes TEM (TEM-1), OXA-23-like (OXA-23), and OXA-51-like (OXA-66 and OXA-69) were analyzed by RT-qPCR using the Agilent Mx3005P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara) and SYBR Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Austin) in a final volume of 20 μL. The primers used for analysis are listed in Table 1. Cycling condition was carried out at 50°C for 2 minutes and 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 55°C for 15 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute. Triplicate samples were analyzed and standardized against 16S rRNA gene expression.[11 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptomic Analysis of Caco-2 Cells and Colon Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caco-2 monolayer cells were seeded in 6-well plates at the seeding density of 2.0 × 105 cells/ml and cultured for 21 days. Afterward, probiotic V (10 μl), Met (1 mM), and ethanol (100 mM) were added according to their respective groups and incubated for 48 h. Cells were harvested using the TRIzol Reagent extraction method. Also, for in vivo studies, a total of 4 mg of colonic RNA was isolated from the colon tissue using the TRIzol Reagent extraction method. The concentrations (ng/μl) and purity (A260/A280) of extracted RNA were measured by a NanoDrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Extracted RNA was given a DNase treatment, and cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR amplification for quantifying the gene expressions was done using the SYBR/ROX Master Mix in an Agilent Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent Stratagene) for the following primers (Tables 1 and 2). The respective gene expressions were normalized to the 18S rRNA gene expression (endogenous control). The quantification of results was done using the 2−ΔΔCT method [35 (link)] and expressed as fold-over basal change comparative to the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microarray Data Validation via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the microarray data, the total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the Superscript® III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the cDNA was amplified with seven primers designed using Primer 3 software (version 4.0). Six genes (aicda, cyb5d1, edar, intl2, ogfr12 and tnfsf13b) and beta actin (endogenous control gene) were selected from the available sequences at GenBank. The gene accession numbers and primer sequences used for the quantitative real-time PCR are shown in Table C in S1 File. The SYBR Green-based quantitative real-time PCR was performed on an Agilent Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The reactions were performed using the Brilliant III Ultra Fast SYBR® Green QPCR Master mix (Agilent Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) for one cycle of 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 20 s.
The relative quantification of gene expression was performed using the 2∆∆Ct method [14 (link)]. The efficiencies of the PCR reactions for the genes were 90–110% under the optimized qPCR conditions, and the specificity of the primers was determined through melting-curve analysis [15 (link)]. Each amplification reaction was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA extractions were performed using an Absolutely RNA Microprep kit (Agilent Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For each experiment, the same amount of RNA (mean 1 µg) was used to synthesize cDNA in a 50-µl final volume using Superscript II (Invitrogen) and random hexamers (Roche). Genomic DNA contaminations were avoided by treatment with DNaseI (Absolutely RNA Microprep), and control of genomic contamination was measured by performing the same procedure without reverse transcription. qPCR experiments were performed with 5 ng cDNA per reaction, using a KAPA SYBR FAST reagent (Kapabiosystems) on an Agilent Mx3005P qPCR System. The relative expressions of each gene were normalized to their expression in the respective control condition. All primers were designed using Lasergene 7.2 software (DNAStar) and are presented in Tables S1 and S2. Analyses of the results were performed using Mx Pro-Mx3005P v4.10 and GraphPad Prism software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying COX-2 mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using the RNAprep pure Cell kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA as the template in a 20-µl reaction volume using the FastQuant RT kit (with gDNase; Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) at 42°C for 15 min and 95°C for 3 min according to the manufacturer's instructions. The mRNA level of genes was detected with SuperRealPreMix Plus (SYBR-Green) from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. The relative quantification for the mRNA level of the genes was performed by RT-qPCR using the Agilent Mx3005P qPCR system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in triplicate for each of the independently prepared RNAs. The primer sequences used were as follows: COX2 (PTGS2) forward, 5′-CAG CCA TAC AGC AAA TCC TTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAA ATG TGA TCT GGA TGT CAA C-3′; β-actin forward, 5′-CAC CAG GGC GTG ATG GT-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTC AAA CAT GAT CTG GGT CAT-3′. qPCR was performed at 95°C for 15 min, 95°C for 10 sec and 60°C for 20 sec for 40 cycles. The relative levels of COX-2 transcripts were normalized to the expression of β-actin and calculated based on the 2−ΔΔCq method (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Osteocalcin mRNA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was extracted from the tibiae using the RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (73404, Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The tibiae were homogenized in a bullet blender in ice-cold QiaZol and with frozen bullets (three 32 mm and two 42 mm bullets). The RNA content was quantified with a NanoDrop. cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg RNA and the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (4368814, Applied Biosystem, Life Technologies). qPCR was performed using the Agilent Mx3005P qPCR System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) in a 20 μl reaction mixture containing 10 μl SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (QUNT95074-012), 5 μl cDNA sample, 15 pmol of forward and reverse gene-specific primer-pairs (TagC, Denmark), and DNase-free water to a total volume of 20 μl. The specific sequences of the primer sets were: osteocalcin F: GCTCTGTCTCTCTGACCTCACA, osteocalcin R: TAGATGCGTTTGTAGGCGG, rpl13a: F: GGAGGGGCAGGTTCTGGTAT and rpl13a R: TGTTGATGCCTTCACAGCGT. The thermal profile was: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s followed by 40 temperature cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 10 s. The default cycle threshold (CT) value was used. Fold changes in mRNA expression levels were calculated according to the comparative CT method and normalized using the level of rpl13a mRNA as described previously29 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!