The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using j w db wax capillary column

1

Quantification of Short-Chain Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCFAs in fecal samples were extracted and determined according to our previously reported method with appropriate modifications (Guo et al., 2020a (link)). Briefly, saturated NaCl solution (500 μL) was added to dried feces (50 mg) and placed at room temperature (25 °C) for 0.5 h, followed by homogenization on a high-speed homogenizer for 3 min. Then, 20 μL H2SO4 (10%, v/v) was added and mixed with a vortex for 30 s. The total SCFAs were completely collected with 800 μL anhydrous ether and then centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4 °C). Finally, the residual trace water in the supernatants were removed with anhydrous Na2SO4, and the contents of SCFAs in the supernatants were determined by Agilent 7890B gas chromatography system equipped with Agilent J&W DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and flame ionization detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SCFAs in fecal samples were extracted and determined according to our previously reported method with appropriate modifications (Guo et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, saturated NaCl solution (500 μL) was added to dried feces (50 mg) and placed at room temperature (25 °C) for 0.5 h, followed by homogenization on a high-speed homogenizer for 3 min. Then, 20 μL H2SO4 (10%, v/v) was added and mixed with a vortex for 30 s. The total SCFAs were collected with 800 μL anhydrous ether and then centrifuged (10000 g, 10 min, 4 °C). Finally, the residual trace water in the supernatants were removed with anhydrous Na2SO4, and the contents of SCFAs in the supernatants were determined by Agilent 7890B gas chromatography system equipped with Agilent J&W DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and flame ionization detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Biofuel Precursors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown in liquid YPD media from a starting OD600 of 0.1 using semi-anaerobic 50 ml vials over a 21-day period. On specific days, 2 ml samples were taken, passed through a 0.22 μ filter into gas chromatography (GC) vials and analysed by GC-FID using an Agilent 6850A GC system with an Agilent 4513A automatic injector, sampler and controller (Agilent technologies Ltd., Stockport, UK). A J&W DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μM) (Agilent technologies Ltd.) was used for separation. Samples were quantified relative to standards of ethanol and butanol.
GC-MS was carried out using media from anaerobic cultures grown in YPD for 5 days. Using a 6890 N GC system coupled to a 5973 Mass Selective Detector (MSD) (Agilent technologies Ltd.), 2 ml samples were collected and analysed. Data was analysed and processed using the MSD ChemStation software (Agilent technologies Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Volatile Composition of Yeast Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The volatile composition of the YD powders was characterized by SPME–GC–MS, as reported previously (Comuzzo et al. 2015b (link)). Analyses were carried out using a GC-17A gas chromatograph equipped with a QP-5000 mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Autolysate samples (2.00 g) were introduced in 50 mL amber glass vials sealed with PTFE/silicone septa. Vials were pre-conditioned for 15 min at 40 °C before microextraction, and SPME was run at the same temperature for 15 min, using a 2 cm 50/30 µm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). A J&W DB-Wax capillary column, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for the GC separation, with the following operating conditions: 40 °C for 1 min, then 4 °C min−1, up to 240 °C, with a final holding of time of 15 min. Injection was performed in splitless mode with 60 s of splitless time; injection port and transfer line were set at 250 and 240 °C respectively. Carrier gas was helium, at a linear flow rate of 35 cm s−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Methods for Sake Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sake meter value, sake acidity, and amino acid levels were measured as previously described6 . Organic acids were quantified using HPLC with a Shim-pack SCR-102H column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Aroma components were quantified using headspace GC with a J & W DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm internal diameter × 0.50 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Ethanol concentration was measured using an ethanol analyser (RIKEN KEIKI, Tokyo, Japan). Sugars were determined by monitoring post-column derivative reducing sugars separated using a Prominence reducing-sugar HPLC analytical system (Shimadzu) equipped with a fluorescence detector. Sake fermented with MC87-46 and K901 was separated on a Shim-pack 4.0 × 250-mm ISA-07/S2504 column (Shimadzu) with a linear gradient of 0.1 M potassium borate buffer (pH 8.0) and 0.4 M potassium borate buffer (pH 9.0) for 140 min at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min37 (link),38 (link). Sugars were also lyophilized, trimethylsilylated, and analysed using a GCMS-QP2010 (Shimadzu) equipped with a J & W DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies)39 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Fatty Acids and Phosphatidic Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FAs were extracted from several mg of lyophilized powder as described by Guo et al. (2019b (link)). FA methyl esters were analyzed with an Agilent GC–MS device (5973 inert mass spectrometer combined with 6890N gas chromatograph) equipped with an Agilent J&W DB-WAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm) in a splitless mode. The temperature was set at 150°C for 3 min, then increased to 240°C at 10°C min−1, and kept at 240°C for 5 min. For PA analysis, 5–10 mg of lyophilized powder was treated with 0.01% (w/v) butylated hydroxytoluene in isopropanol (100 µL mg−1) at 75°C for 18 min to deactivate lipid-hydrolyzing enzymes, and extracted with chloroform:methanol:300 mM ammonium acetate (30:41.5:3.5; 300 µL mg−1) at 4°C for 30 min. The samples were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, 4°C for 5 min. After another round of extraction, the supernatants were combined and dried under N2 gas. The extracted lipids were subject to normal phase analysis at LipidALL Technologies Company Ltd. (Changzhou, China) using an Exion UPLC-QTRAP 6500 Plus (Sciex) LC–MS/MS equipped with a Phenomenex Luna 3 µm silica column (internal diameter 150 × 2 mm) as reported previously (Liu et al., 2020 (link)). Individual PA species were quantified by reference to the spiked internal standards d7-PA33:1(15:0/18:1) and DMPA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Headspace Analysis of Freeze-Dried Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization of the volatile composition of the headspace of the freeze-dried powders was carried out by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. The equipment used was a GC-17A gas chromatograph, coupled with a QP-5000 mass spectrometer (both from Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Two (2.00) g of each freeze-dried sample were introduced in 50 ml amber glass vials and sealed with PTFE/silicone septa. SPME was carried out by a 2 cm length 50/30 m DVB/Carboxen/PDMS fiber (from Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA), at 40 °C for 15 min. To allow the thermal equilibration of the sample, the vials were pre-conditioned for 15 min before microextraction.
GC separation was carried out on a J&W DB-Wax capillary column, 30 m x 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), according to the conditions reported by Comuzzo et al. (2015a) . Electron impact mass spectra were recorded at mass spectra and retention times with those of standard compounds, or by comparison of mass spectrum, with those reported in the mass spectrum libraries Wiley 6 and NIST 107.
Linear retention indices were also calculated on the basis of the retention times of n-alkanes, and compared with those reported in literature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The system used for GC-MS analyses was a GC-17A gas chromatograph coupled with a QP-5000 mass spectrometer (both by Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Volatile compounds were separated on a J&W DB-Wax capillary column (30 m x 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness) provided by Agilent Technologies Inc. (Santa Clara, CA, USA), under the following operating conditions: 40 °C for 1 min, then 4 °C min -1 up to 240 °C, held for 15 min. The injection (1 μl) was made in splitless mode, with a splitless time of 60 s. Injector and detector temperatures were both set at 240 °C. Carrier gas was helium at a linear flow rate of 35 cm s - 1 . Electron impact mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV and volatile compounds were tentatively identified by comparison of their mass spectra and retention times with those of standard compounds, or by comparison of mass spectrum with those reported in the mass spectrum libraries Wiley 6 and NIST 107. Moreover, linear retention indices were calculated according to the retention times of n-alkanes, and compared with those reported in literature.
Semi-quantitative analysis was based on the internal standard method, considering a response factor equal to 1.00.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!