The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eos rebel t5i camera

Manufactured by Canon
Sourced in Japan

The Canon EOS Rebel T5i is a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera. It features a 18.0 megapixel CMOS sensor, DIGIC 5 image processor, and a 3-inch vari-angle touch screen LCD. The camera is capable of capturing high-resolution images and full HD 1080p video.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using eos rebel t5i camera

1

Standardized Plant Canopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We utilized a Canon EOS REBEL T5i camera for image acquisition. Images were stored in the native RAW format. Substantial effort was put in to develop a standard imaging protocol (SIP) (Additional file 1) to ensure imaging consistency and quality. The flash function was kept off and an umbrella was always used to shade the area under the camera view in order to minimize illumination discrepancies between images. A light/color calibration protocol was also followed. An image of a color calibration chart (X-Rite ColorChecker Color Rendition Chart) was taken at the beginning of imaging operations, and every 20 min thereafter or whenever light condition changes (cloud cover, etc.). When taking pictures, the whole canopy was fit in the field of view of the camera. Weed control was practiced consistent with research plots and commercial farms; however, due to the small size of the field weed removal was done manually. Weeds in the view of camera were removed for enhanced efficiency of subsequent image processing. Images were taken across several days (at several times of the day) under various illumination conditions. Finally, the imaging protocol was chosen so that the imaging window and the camera resolution resulted in images with at least 6 pixels/mm, ensuring that the approach is transferable to other cameras that use an appropriate imaging window to get this resolution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Colony Size Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were analysed the same way, including images from Stynen et al. (2018) (link). Images of plates were taken with a EOS Rebel T5i camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) every two hours during the entire course of the PCA experiments. Incubation and imaging were performed in a spImager custom platform (S&P Robotics Inc, Toronto, Canada). We considered images after two days of growth for diploid selection plates and after four days of growth for DMSO and MTX plates. Images were analysed using gitter (R package version 1.1.1; Wagih and Parts, 2014 (link)) to quantify colony sizes by defining a square around the colony center and measuring the foreground pixel intensity minus the background pixel intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized Imaging Protocol for Plant Canopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were taken using a Canon EOS REBEL T5i camera with the Scene Intelligent Auto model. All images were stored in RAW image quality with a resolution of 5184 × 3456 (18 M). For consistent illumination, the flash function was kept off, and an umbrella was always used to shade the area under the camera view. A picture of the X-Rite Color Checker Color Rendition Chart was taken at the beginning of imaging operations and every 20 min thereafter or whenever the light condition changed (e.g., cloud cover) to calibrate the illumination of plant canopy images collected at that moment. When taking pictures, the whole canopy was fit in the field of view of the camera. Whenever possible, weeds and other plant residuals, connected to the plant canopy in the view of camera, were removed for easy image processing and enhanced efficiency of subsequent image processing. A detailed imaging protocol is shown in Box 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In vitro and in vivo RNAi Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods for in vitro dsRNA synthesis have been described in our recent paper (Yoon, Shukla, Gong, Mogilicherla, & Palli, 2016 (link)). For in vitro RNAi assay, 25,000 TCA cells/well were seeded in 96 well plates. The equal amount (1 μg/μl) of dsRNA was added to cell and pictures were taken on 6th day after dsRNA treatment. The same amount of luciferase dsRNA was used as a negative control. For in vivo RNAi assay, 200 ng of dsRNA was injected into the dorsal side of the abdomen using a Drummond Nanoject III fitted with 3.5″ glass capillary tube, pulled by a needle puller (Model P-1000, Sutter Instruments). Newly molted last instar larvae were injected. After injection, the insects were reared under standard conditions. Mortality was recorded after 14 days. Those insects showing distinct phenotypes after dsIAP1 treatment were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 0.1% trypan blue solution to identify the excreted substance. The phenotype of the quiescent stage larvae and adults injected with dsTcIAP5 were photographed using a digital microscope system (UNITRON Z850 Stereo Microscope, CB-ZM deep focus extension module, QuickPHOTO industrial 3.1 program, Canon EOS Rebel T5i camera).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mite Body-Color Phenotypes Analyzed

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days post soaking, mite body-color associated with the application of dsRNAs was counted and frequencies calculated, except for mites treated with dsRNAs against TuRpt3 and TuHsc70-3 that required 4 to 5 days post dsRNA treatment for the establishment of the body-color change. A significant difference in the proportion of color phenotype, spotless, black, or normal was analyzed with Fisher’s exact test (Fisher test function, R package ‘stats’). For multiple comparisons of phenotype proportions between treatments Fisher’s exact test was used (fisher multcomp function, R package ‘RVAideMemoire’) and a Bonferroni correction of p-values was applied. Confidence intervals of proportions were determined using Clopper–Pearson method59 . Images of mite body phenotypes were taken using a Canon EOS Rebel T5i camera (Canon, Japan) fitted on an upright dissecting microscope (Leica, Germany). The experiment was conducted in 3 independent trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Marginal Adaptation Using Dye Technique

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the marginal adaptation, a dye technique was used (10) . After thermocycling, before the push-out test, a 1% solution of red propylene glycol (caries detector dye, Kuraray Co., Osaka, Japan) was applied to the margins of the restoration for 5 s. Specimens were then rinsed in tap water and gently dried. They were then attached vertically to a holding device coupled with a lateral ruler of 2 cm, allowing calibration. Subsequently, photographs of the top and bottom of the restoration were obtained with a Canon EOS Rebel T5i Camera, positioned at a focal distance of 60 cm. The amount of stained margins was analyzed using Image Pro-Plus 7.0 (Media Cybernetic) software. The perimeter of the cementation line was measured in the photographs of each sample using a micrometric scale, which allowed following the contour of the restoration. The stained areas in the margins were then measured in both sides of each sample. This technique stained the gaps so they could easily be quantified (10) . Data were entered in an EXCEL spreadsheet to calculate the percentage of gaps in each sample and analyzed statistically. The marginal adaptation evaluation was done by a single trained evaluator. After, the samples were submitted to the push-out test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!