The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using autopore 4 9510

1

Comprehensive Characterization of HNXP Paper

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HNXP samples were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å, Rigaku D/max 2550V, Japan), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (FTIR-7600, Lambda Scientific, Australia). Contact angle tests were performed using an automatic contact angle meter (Model SL200B, USA). The pore size and pore size distribution of the HNXP paper were measured with an automatic mercury porosimeter (AutoPore IV 9510, Micromeritics, USA). The tensile strength and whiteness tests of the HNXP paper were conducted according to the GB/T18739-2008 standards. To ensure the data repeatability, at least three parallel tests were carried out for each measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Membrane Characterization by Porosimetry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface area (m2/g), porosity (%), and pore size distribution (nm) of the MPG membrane were measured by mercury instruction porosimetry (Auto Pore IV 9510, Micromeritics, GA, USA). The peak of pore size distribution measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry was regard as the pore size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of CS-P24/HA Scaffold

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the scaffold with electron microscopy, the CS-P24/HA scaffold was sputter-coated with gold and observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-7001F, Japan). The porosity of the CS-P24/HA scaffold was measured by a mercury intrusion analyzer (Autopore IV 9510, Micromeritics, USA). The element composition and chemical states analysis of CS/HA, CS-5%P24/HA, and CS-10%P24/HA scaffolds were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB-250Xi) equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source. The binding energy was calibrated with C1s = 284.8 eV. Both N 1s and S 2p high-resolution spectra were recorded with a pass energy of 20 eV and an energy resolution of 0.05 eV. The P24 release profiles of CS-P24/HA scaffold were determined in vitro by high performance liquid chromatography system (HPLC, Shimadzu 10Avp, Japan). The CS-P24/HA samples were immersed in 5.0 mL sterile PBS solution and incubated at 37 °C under continuously shaking (40 rpm) for 90 days. At designated time points, the supernatant was collected and resuspended in the fresh PBS. The amount of P24 in the obtained supernatant was then measured by HPLC. All experiments were performed in triplicate for each of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Dried and Heat-Treated Gel Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology
and microstructure
of the fractured surfaces of the dried gels and heat-treated gels
were characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU-70,
Hitachi, Ltd., Japan). The macropore size distribution over the diameter
from 20 nm to 100 mm of the dried gels and heat-treated gel monoliths
were evaluated by mercury intrusion porosimetry (Belsorp mini II,
Bel Japan Inc., Toyonaka, Japan, and AutoPore IV 9510, Micromeritics
Instrument Corp.). The crystal structure of the samples after heat-treatment
was confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD: Empyrean 200895, PAN
analytical B.V., Holland). The porosity (%) of each sample was calculated
as [(1 – ρb)/ρs] –
100, (ρb and ρs are the bulk and
skeletal densities, respectively). Carrier concentrations of C12A7:e were characterized by Hall measurement (HL5500, Nanometrics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structures and compositions
were characterized by X-ray
diffraction (3kw-D/MAX2500V, Rigaku) using a Cu Kα radiation
(λ = 1.5406 Å), where the data were collected at a scanning
rate of 4°/min, and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF-1800,
Shimadzu). TG-DSC measurements were performed using a NETZSCH thermal
analyzer, where the samples were heated at 5 °C/min in air. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using
a Thermo ESCALAB 250XI equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray
source. The microstructure and surface morphology were examined by
scanning electron microscopy (using an FEI JFM-7500F scanning electron
microscope) and an optical profiler (Contour GT-K, Bruker). The surface
area and mesopore analyses were performed using a nitrogen gas sorption
porosity analyzer (Autosorb-IQ2, Quantachrome). The porosity and macropore
size distribution were obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP,
AutoPore Iv 9510, Micromeritics). The CA and SA were measured with
water droplets at room temperature using a JCY-2 instrument (Fangrui,
China). The three-point flexural strengths of the sintered samples
were measured with a strength testing machine at a loading rate of
2 N/s (Instron-5566, 10 kN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Coal Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to ASTM
standards (ASTM: 2007), the proximate analysis of coal was carried
out using a 5E-MAG6600 automatic industrial analyzer. Based on the
international standards (ISO 7404-5: 1984), vitrinite reflectance
(Ro) was measured using (Zeiss, Germany)
a microscope photometer. The maximum paleo temperature (Tpeak, the coal/intrusion contact temperature) can be calculated
by the following formula established by Barker and Pawlewicz:51
Referring to Taylor
and Glick,52 the maceral composition of
the coals can be obtained through incident light microscopy and oil
immersion. The porosity of the coal was measured by the mercury injection
method of Auto Pore IV 9510 (Micromeritics, USA). During the methane
adsorption experiment, 50 g crushed coal with a particle size of 0.2–0.25
mm were set at 30 °C, and the adsorption equilibrium gas pressure
reached 6 MPa. The determination of gas content adopts the direct
method and follows the Chinese national standard (State Administration
of Coal Mine Safety of China: 2008). The gas desorption experiment
of coal samples with different moisture contents was carried out for
120 min. The gas desorption amount of coal samples with various moisture
contents at different times can be obtained by the drainage method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pore Size Analysis of Fiber Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mercury porosimetry (AutoPore Iv 9510, Micromeritics, USA) was used to measure the pore size distributions and porosities of the samples composed of fibers, whose actual density was 0.11 g cm−3 during the test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mercury Porosimetry of Drug Tablet Porosity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mercury porosimetry runs were undertaken using an Autopore IV 9510 (Micromeritics, Madrid, Spain) porosimeter with a 3 cm3 penetrometer. An adequate number of tablets per tested formulation was used in order to obtain a stem volume between 25% and 90% of the penetrometer capacity. Working pressures covered the range 0.1–60,000 psi. Total porosity and pore size distribution of tablets were determined before and after the drug release study in duplicate and for each tested batch.
In the case of leached tablets, the porosity results have been normalized by subtracting the initial mercury intrusion, in order to perform a clearer comparison of the structure of the pore network inside these systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph and elemental mapping analysis were obtained using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrograph was recorded with a transmission electron microscope (JEOL F2100). The porosity was measured by the mercury intrusion method (AutoPore IV 9510, Micromeritics). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using a thermal analyzer (STA 409/PC, Netzsch) in flowing air at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area was measured using a surface area analyzer (Tristar II 3020, Micromeritics). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was recorded with a FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Nexus 470). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern was recorded using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku D/max 2550 V, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å). The pore size distribution curve was analysed using a pore size analyzer (3H-2000, Beshide Instrument Technology) based on a bubble point method. The zeta potential was measured by a potential analyzer (ZetaPlus, Brookhaven, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Shale Porosity and Pore-Throat Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MICP technique can effectively determine connected porosity and pore-throat size distribution, using a mercury intrusion porosimeter (AutoPore IV 9510; Micromeritics Corporation)5 . The cubic sample with a linear dimension of 10 mm was dried at 60 °C for at least 48 hours to remove moisture, and cooled to room temperature (~23 °C) in a desiccator with relative humidity less than 10%. Then, low- (5 to 30 psi; 0.034 to 0.21 MPa) and high-pressure (30 to 60000 psi; 0.21 to 413 MPa) analyses were initiated by progressively increasing the intrusion pressure while monitoring the volume change of mercury at a detection limit of <0.1 μL. Pore-throat size distributions from MICP tests were obtained using the Washburn equation43 (link), with the confinement correction of contact angle and surface tension of mercury in shale nanopores27 (link). The corrected pore-throat diameters cover a measurement range of 50 μm to 2.8 nm for the experimental conditions (e.g., using a penetrometers with a filling pressure of 5 psi) suitable for shale samples with porosities commonly less than 5%. Pore structure parameters (such as pore-throat size distribution, median pore-throat size, pore volume, pore area, and porosity) can be obtained for multiple connected pore networks at nm-μm spectrum8 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!