The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Columbus 2

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Columbus 2.7 is a high-performance imaging system designed for advanced cell-based assays. It features a flexible and modular architecture, allowing users to configure the system to meet their specific research needs. The system provides advanced image acquisition and analysis capabilities, enabling researchers to obtain detailed insights into cellular processes and behaviors.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using columbus 2

1

Automated Imaging of UPR Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence and direct fluorescence in SK‐N‐SH and Mif‐inducible IgM heavy chain HeLa cells and co‐culture UPR reporter assays were imaged using an automated microscopy platform (CellInsight CX7; ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DAPI (nuclear marker) was used for autofocus and immunofluorescence experiments were imaged with a 10× objective and 25 fields of view per well and UPR reporter assays with a 20× objective and 20 fields of view per well. Image analysis was performed with Columbus 2.5 software (PerkinElmer, Groningen, The Netherlands). For both ATF4 and XBP1 immunostainings as well as UPR reporters, fluorescence intensity in the nucleus (DAPI mask) followed by background subtraction (ring around nucleus) was used as output data. BiP immunofluorescence was measured in a whole cell mask [either MAP2, Tubulin beta III isoform (SK‐N‐SH cells) or GAPDH (IgM heavy chain HeLa cells)]. Negative stainings (secondary antibody only incubation) were also used to determine background values for immunofluorescence experiments and values were subtracted from output data of ATF4, XBP1, and BiP analyses. In experiments with SK‐N‐SH cells, the highest and lowest data points (one pair/experiment) were excluded from the datasets. Data of UPR reporter experiments were normalized by rescaling between 1 (minimum; EtOH/Mif 48 h) and 10 (maximum; TG) per experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Neuronal GFP Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At DIV1 neurons were infected with deltaCre-GFP lentivirus, the deltaCre targets the GFP to the nucleus. Treatments as indicated in figure legend, were performed at DIV14 followed by formaldehyde fixation (as described in the immunocytochemistry section). Neurons were imaged using a cellomics array scan (CellInsight CX7 High-Content Screening (HCS) Platform; ThermoFisher Scientific) with a 10x objective, 15 fields of view per well. Quantification was performed with Columbus 2.5 software (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-throughput Microscopy-based Screening for HAC Loss

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TIFF files generated by the CV7000S microscope were imported and analyzed using PerkinElmer Columbus 2.7. The DAPI channel was used to segment a nuclear ROI mask, which was then used to measure the mean fluorescence intensity in the nucleus in the GFP channel. Nuclei touching the image borders and nuclei with a roundness value <0.7, often representing nuclear segmentation errors, were excluded from the subsequent analysis steps. The cells with values of GFP mean fluorescence intensity <100 AU, an empirically determined threshold that was kept constant for all plates in the screen, were classified as GFP−. The percentage of GFP− cells was used as a proxy for measuring HAC loss. Well-level data were exported as tab-separated text files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Customized image analysis software (Columbus 2.7, PerkinElmer) was used for the image analysis and the quantification. Hoechst staining was used for the segmentation of both nuclei and cell. Next, the mean fluorescence intensity of each mCherry and YFP signals in the cytoplasm were quantified. The mean fluorescence intensity of each signals were then normalized to the fold-change based on the non-targeting siRNA in the same plate. To evaluate the impact of each siRNA, an average of 1000 cells was analyzed per run (n = 3). For the quality control of HTS, we used strictly standardized mean difference with more than 3 of beta-score of two positive control (siRNA-APP and siRNA-PS1, n = 14 each per plate) (Supplemental Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Automated quantitative image analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Customized image analysis software (Columbus 2.7, PerkinElmer) was used for the image analysis and the quantification. Hoechst staining was used for the segmentation of both nuclei and cell. Next, the mean fluorescence intensity of each mCherry and YFP signals in the cytoplasm were quantified. The mean fluorescence intensity of each signals were then normalized to the fold change based on the non-targeting siRNA in the same plate. To evaluate the impact of each siRNA, an average of 1,000 cells was analyzed per run (n=3). For the quality control of HTS, we used strictly standardized mean difference with more than 3 of beta-score of two positive control (siRNA-APP and siRNA-PS1, n=14 each per plate) (Supplemental Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Automated Single-Cell Transcriptomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were imported and analyzed in Columbus 2.7 or 2.8 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Briefly, nuclei were segmented using the DAPI channel, and dilated by a fix percentage to generate an approximate cell body region of interest. For digital HCR (dHCR, Choi, 2018) HCR foci were first detected over the cell body region using Columbus spot finding algorithm C, and then filtered using a user-trained Fisher Linear Discriminant classifier based on fluorescence intensity and contrast. The output of dHCR was number of HCR spots per cell. For quantitative HCR (qHCR, Choi et al. 2018 ) the mean fluorescence intensity in the HCR channel was measured over the cell body region and used as the output measurement. Single cell results were exported from Columbus as text files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Time-lapse Imaging of Cell Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Percentage cell death was assayed every 30-45 mins by time-lapse imaging using the IncuCyte® live cell analysis imaging (Essenbioscience) or the Opera Phenix™ High Content Screening System (PerkinElmer, USA) for 16 hours with 5%CO2 and 37°C climate control. For the IncuCyte® and Opera Phenix™ dead cells were identified by propidium iodide (PI; 0.25 μg/ml) staining and for the Opera Phenix™ all cells were stained with 250nM of SiR-DNA (Spirochrome, Switzerland). Dyes were added to the cells 2 hours before imaging and compounds were added 10 minutes before the start of imaging. For the Opera Phenix™, images were analysed using the server based Columbus 2.8.0 software (PerkinElmer, USA) to identify nuclei based on SiR-DNA staining and dead cells using PI staining. Results were exported as counts per well to be processed and graphed using R Studio (https://www.R-project.org/) with the tidyverse package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Time-lapse Imaging of Cell Death

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Percentage cell death was assayed every 30-45 mins by time-lapse imaging using the IncuCyte® live cell analysis imaging (Essenbioscience) or the Opera Phenix™ High Content Screening System (PerkinElmer, USA) for 16 hours with 5%CO2 and 37°C climate control. For the IncuCyte® and Opera Phenix™ dead cells were identified by propidium iodide (PI; 0.25 μg/ml) staining and for the Opera Phenix™ all cells were stained with 250nM of SiR-DNA (Spirochrome, Switzerland). Dyes were added to the cells 2 hours before imaging and compounds were added 10 minutes before the start of imaging. For the Opera Phenix™, images were analysed using the server based Columbus 2.8.0 software (PerkinElmer, USA) to identify nuclei based on SiR-DNA staining and dead cells using PI staining. Results were exported as counts per well to be processed and graphed using R Studio (https://www.R-project.org/) with the tidyverse package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Optimizing mRNA Delivery for CRISPR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For optimization of mRNA delivery, cells were seeded at ∼70% confluency and reverse transfected with indicated concentrations of mRNA-Cas9-HA containing 5-methoxyuridine (5moU) or mRNA-eGFP 5moU (TriLink) in MessengerMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were fixed either 6 or 24 h after transfection and processed for immunofluorescence. Cas9 expression was monitored by the intensity of the HA signal, which was quantified using Columbus 2.9.1 (Perkin Elmer). Unless stated otherwise, the concentration of mRNA-Cas9-HA was fixed at 40 ng per well of a 384-well plate. Cells were reverse transfected with mRNA-Cas9-HA coupled with 1% (vol/vol) MessengerMAX in OptiMEM for 6 h prior to crRNA transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimizing mRNA-Cas9 Delivery and Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For optimisation of mRNA delivery, cells were seeded at ~70% confluency and reverse transfected with indicated concentrations of mRNA-Cas9-HA containing 5-methoxyuridine (5moU) or mRNA-eGFP 5moU (TriLink) in MessengerMAX (Thermo Fisher) or RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher). Samples were fixed either 6- or 24-h post-transfection and processed for immunofluorescence. Cas9 expression was monitored by the intensity of HA signal, which was quantified using Columbus 2.9.1 (Perkin Elmer). For screening and all other experiments, the concentration of mRNA-Cas9-HA was fixed at 40 ng per well of a 384-well plate. Cells were reverse transfected with mRNA-Cas9-HA coupled with 1% (v/v) MessengerMAX in OptiMEM for 6 h prior to crRNA transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!