The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jasp software package

Manufactured by JASP Stats

JASP is an open-source statistical software package. Its core function is to provide users with a comprehensive set of statistical analysis tools, including descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, regression, and more. JASP offers a user-friendly interface and supports a variety of data formats.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using jasp software package

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analyses were conducted using the JASP software package (Version 0.14.1, JASP Team, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Student's t-test was used to determine significant differences between two groups, and one-way ANOVA with the least significant difference test was performed to compare more than two groups. All data are presented as mean ± SD, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bayesian Statistical Analysis of Neurosurgical Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using ANOVAs within a Bayesian framework using the JASP software package (V.0.14.1; (JASP Team, 2020 )). The ANOVAs used a uniform prior model probability, and the assumption of normality were visualized using a Q-Q plot of the residuals. For both the test–retest reliability and the spatial location analyses patient ID and neurosurgeon ID were included as nuisance variables. For the Dice coefficient and volumetric analysis, the patient ID was included as a nuisance variable. The implementation of the Bayesian ANOVA in JASP relies on the R package BayesFactor (V.0.9.10–2; (Morey and Rouder, 2015 , Rouder et al., 2012 (link))). The resulting Bayes Factors (BF) are interpreted in light of assumptions proposed by (Jeffreys, 1998 ) and adapted by (Wetzels et al., 2011 (link)). Note that the analyses regarding the test–retest reliability, Dice coefficient and volume are based on values calculated in native space whereas the spatial location analysis is based on values in MNI space.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Investigating Arithmetic Skill Correlates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analyses, the JASP software package (JASP Team, 2017 ) was used to calculate Pearson correlations and their corresponding Bayes Factors between the results of the TTA and the extracted mean values of the ROIs. The Bayesian approach has the advantage to quantify the evidence that data provide for one hypothesis over another (Andraszewicz et al., 2015 ). Accordingly, Bayes factors (BF10) of 1, 1–3, 3–10, 10–30, 30–100, or > 100 respectively point towards no, anecdotal, substantial, strong, very strong, or decisive evidence for the hypothesis of an association between two variables (Jeffreys, 1961 ). The results of the frequentist approach to statistical testing are also reported. For these analyses, the Bonferroni method of controlling for multiple comparisons (p = Target Alpha Level/number of ROIs; p = .05/42 = 0.001 for voxel-based morphometry and p = .05/78 = 0.0006 for cortical complexity) was implemented. Partial correlations were also calculated with IQ and motor reaction time simultaneously added as control variables. To test the specificity of the results, the significant correlations were also calculated with our reading measure as to check whether any observed associations with arithmetic are also observed with another symbolic academic skill (i.e., reading), measured in a similar, timed, way.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Assessing Knowledge and Emotions in Science Education

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analysed using the JASP software package (Amsterdam, 0.16.4.0). After application of the Shapiro-Wilk test, the conclusion was that the sample did not follow a normal distribution, so non-parametric statistics were used for data analysis.
Both questionnaires, pre and post-test, have been validated by five experts in Experimental Sciences Education, who read, corrected, and suggested improvements which were then incorporated. The questionnaire was in Spanish. The knowledge questionnaire used (pre-test and post-test) is a validated questionnaire published by Giraldo-Toro et al. (2015). The emotional questionnaire used is a validated questionnaire published by authors (Hernández-Barco et al., 2021b ). The value of McDonald's ω allowed us to know the questionnaire's reliability. The result was a value of ω = 0.814, which corresponds to acceptable reliability since it is between 0.70 and 0.90 (Ventura-León and Caycho-Rodríguez, 2017 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bayesian Analysis of Drug Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drug effects on model-free performance measures and fMRI parameter estimates extracted at specific peaks were analyzed via Bayesian repeated measures ANOVAs using the JASP software package (Version 0.16.3)64 (link). The normality of residuals was verified via Q-Q-plots, which showed no credible evidence for deviations from normality (see Supplemental Fig. S18).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!