The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using cd45 alexa fluor 700

1

Characterization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electroporated CD34+ HSPCs were stained with CD45-AlexaFluor700 (BioLegend, clone H130), CD34-PE/Cy7 (BioLegend, clone 581), CD44-BV421 (BioLegend, clone IM7), and CD29-APC (BD Pharmingen, clone MAR4 (RUO)). Mouse BM cells were stained with CD45-AlexaFluor700 (BioLegend, clone H130), HLA-A,B,C-PE/Cy7 (BioLegend, clone W6/32), CD33-PE (BioLegend, clone WM53), and CD19-BV605 (BD Biosciences, clone SJ25C1). All antibodies were used in the concentration recommended by the manufacturer. Dead cells and debris were excluded by forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC), DAPI or 7-AAD staining (1:100 dilution prior to analysis). The flow cytometry analyses were performed with BD LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences) or BD LSRFortessa instrument (BD Biosciences). To analyse the data, the software FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation of Mouse Colonic Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surgically removed fresh 1-cm mouse colon tissues were opened and washed with cold PBS to remove the fecal contents. The tissues were quickly transported to the centrifuge tube containing 10 mL 1640 medium (10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S), 1 mM EDTA) on an orbital shaker at 300 rpm for 30 min at 37°C. After washing, the colons were finely minced and digested with 15 mL of HBSS containing 10% FBS, 1.5 mg/mL Type-VIII Collagenase (C2139; Millipore, Sigma), and 40 μg/mL DNase I at 300 rpm for 15 min at 37°C. After the digestion, the digested colonic lamina propria cells were filtered through a 100-μm strainer, centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C, and resuspended in 2 mL PBS for flow cytometric analysis.82 (link)The antibodies as follows: (1) CD45-Alexa Fluor 700 (103,128, Biolegend), MHCII-APC (107,613, Biolegend), CD11c-PE (117,307, Biolegend), F4/80-FITC (123,108, Biolegend), CD11b-Percp-Cy5.5 (101,227, Biolegend); (2) CD45-Alexa Fluor 700, CD3-FITC (100,203, Biolegend), CD25-APC (101,909, Biolegend), NK1.1-PE (108,707, Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were stained in a staining buffer containing 2% heat-inactivated rat sera, 1 μg anti-mouse CD16/32 (clone: 93, BioLegend), and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies in the dark for 20 minutes at 4°C. Eosinophils were identified using CD45 Alexa Fluor® 700 (clone: 30-F11, BioLegend), CD11b Brilliant violet (BV) 421™ (clone: M1/70, BioLegend), Ly6C FITC (clone: HK1.4, BioLegend), Ly6G APC Cy7 (clone: 1A8, BioLegend), and Siglec-F PE (clone: S17007L, BioLegend). ILC2s were characterised using CD45 Alexa Fluor® 700 (clone: 30-F11, BioLegend), lineage cocktail PE (CD3ϵ clone: 145-2C11, Ly-6G/Ly-6C clone: RB6-8C5, CD11b clone: M1/70, CD45R/B220 clone: RA3-6B2, TER-119 clone: Ter-119, BioLegend), IL-7Rα (CD127) PE Cy7 (clone: A7R34, BioLegend), ICOS APC (clone: C398.4A, BioLegend), ST2 (IL-33Rα) BV421™ (clone: DIH9, BioLegend), and KLRG1 BV510™ (clone: 2F1/KLRG1, BioLegend). 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) staining was used to identify non-necrotic (‘Live’) cells. Cells were acquired on an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and FACS Aria I (BD Biosciences) for cell sorting. Single-stained and unstained controls were used to compensate for spectral overlap. Data were analyzed using FlowJo© V10 (Treestar, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of CD34+ HSPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD34+ HSPCs were stained with CD45-AlexaFluor700 (BioLegend, clone H130), CD34-PE/Cy7 (BioLegend, clone 581) and CD44-BV421 (BioLegend, clone IM7). All antibodies were used in the concentration recommended by the manufacturer. Debris and dead cells were omitted by forward scatter (FSC), side scatter (SSC), DAPI or 7-AAD staining (1:100 dilution prior to analysis). The flow cytometry analyses were performed using the BD LSRFortessa instrument (BD Biosciences) and cells were sorted using BD FACSAria IIu (BD Biosciences). The software FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC) was used to analyse the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiac Single-Cell Suspension and Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heart single-cell suspension and flow cytometry was prepared as previously described [30 ]. Briefly, hearts were perfused, extracted, finely minced, and then incubated with digestive enzymes at 37 °C on a rocking shaker at 50 rpm for 45–60 min. Samples were homogenized with a 40 μm cell strainer. Red blood cells were lysed using ammonium-chloride-potassium (ACK) lysis buffer. Next, samples were centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was then suspended with FACS buffer. Cells were immune-stained with the following anti-mouse antibodies: CD45-Alexa Fluor®® 700 (BioLegend, 103128, San Diego, CA, USA), CD11b-PerCP (BioLegend, 101228, CA, USA), F480-PE (BioLegend, 123110, CA, USA), CD206-BV421 (BioLegend, 141717, CA, USA), CD64-APC (BioLegend, 161006, CA, USA), Ly-6G- Brilliant Violet 510™ (BioLegend, 127633, CA, USA), Ly-6C-PE/Cyanine7 (BioLegend, 128018, CA, USA), Propidium iodide (Sigma, 25535-16-4, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells were incubated (30 min, 4 °C) with the antibody mixture in a staining buffer (PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% sodium azide) and then washed twice with a staining buffer. Cells were acquired using a LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were analyzed using FlowJo V.10 software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of PD-1, cells were washed in serum-free PBS and stained with a fixable viability dye, eFluor506, CD4-PerCPCy5.5, PD1-PECY7, CD8-APCeFluor780 (eBioscience), incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, and then washed in PBS buffer containing 1% FBS and sodium azide. Cells were stained for Treg cell markers using a FoxP3 staining buffer set (eBioscience) and accompanying protocol. Treg cell markers included CD39-FITC, FoxP3-PE, CD73-PerCPeFluor710, CD25-PECY7, CTLA-4-APC, CD127-APCeFluor780, Ki67-eFluor450 (eBioscience), and CD4-V500 (BD Biosciences). An intracellular staining kit (Fix and Perm kit, Invitrogen) was used to analyze cytokine production after restimulation with PMA/ionomycin. Cells were stained with IL-17A-AlexaFluor488, IL-10-PE, TNF-α-PerCPCy5.5, CD45RA-PECY7, CD8-APCeFluor780, FoxP3-eFluor450 (all eBioSciences), CD45 AlexaFluor700 (BioLegend), IFN-γ-APC, CD3-V500, and IL-2-PE-CF594 (BD Biosciences). Due to PMA/ionomycin-mediated reduction in CD4 expression, CD4+ T cells were identified as CD3+CD8 T cells for cytokine analysis. Cells were acquired on a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo software (Flowjo LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total blood cells or leukocytes from the liver or spleen were incubated with Fc block (eBiociences, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 minutes at 4-8°C. Surface staining was performed for 20 minutes at 4-8°C and always included Fixable Viability Dye (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for exclusion of dead cells. The following conjugated anti-mouse mAbs (and respective clones) were used: CD3 PerCP-Cy5.5 (145-2C11), CD4 APC or Brilliant Violet (BV) 510 (GK1.5), CD8 BV711 (53-6.7), CD62L FITC (MEL-14), CD19 PE (1D3), CD25 APC (3C7), CD44 PE-Cy7 (IM7), CD45 Alexa Fluor 700 (30-F11), CD69 BV650 (H1.2F3), CD127 PE-Dazzle 594 (A7R34), NK1.1 PE-Cy5 (PK136), KLRG1 PE (MAFA), CXCR3 APC (CXCR3-173), TCR γδ BV421 (GL3), all from either BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA) or Sysmex (Kōbe, Hyōgo, Japan). Cells were acquired in a BD LSR Fortessa X-20 cytometer and analyses were performed within live, single (based on FSC-A vs. FSC-W parameters) CD45+ leukocytes using FlowJo v10 (FlowJo, BD). For the clustering and visualization of high-dimensional data, equivalent numbers of live, single CD45+ cells from each condition were concatenated. Clustering was performed using X-shift (number of clusters determined by the algorithm) and data are presented using the dimensionality reduction method TriMAP (large-scale dimensionality reduction using triplets).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The efficiency of gene transfer to total CD34+ cells and the CD45RA subset thereof was determined after staining the cells with the following anti-human-specific antibodies (all from eBioscience, unless noted otherwise): CD34-APC (clone 8G12, STEMCELL Technologies), and CD45RA-APC780 (clone HI100).
For phenotypic analysis of human cells from NSG mice, flow-cytometric analysis was performed on freshly collected BM cells. Cells were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (STEMCELL Technologies), washed, and incubated with a blocking reagent (PBS with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 5% human serum, and anti-CD16/CD32 antibody [2.4G2]). The cells were then stained with the following anti-human-specific antibodies: CD45-Alexa Fluor 700 (clone HI30, BioLegend), CD33-PECY7 (clone WM-53, eBioscience), CD19-PE (clone HIB19, BioLegend), CD20-PE (clone L27, StemCell Technologies). A minimum of 200,000 BM cells were analyzed per mouse. A negative control was set on non-transplanted mouse BM. In some cases, we utilized a fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) gating strategy to overcome the ambiguity created by artifacts that could be introduced by simultaneously compensating different fluorochromes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD45 Alexa Fluor 700 (30-F11, Biolegend), CD19 PerCP/Cy5 (6D5, Biolegend), CD3ε Brilliant Violet 650 (17A2, Biolegend), CD4 PerCP-Cy5.5 (GK1.5, Biolegend), CD49b PE-dazzle 594 (DX5, Biolegend), CD8a Brilliant Brilliant Violet 510 (53–6.7, Biolegend), FoxP3 Alexa 647 (3G3, Thermo-Fisher), and CD285 PE (TLR-5) (ACT5, BD Biosciences) (Supplementary Table 10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Xenograft Tumor Development Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight- to ten-week-old NOD/SCID IL2Rγ−/− mice were intravenously injected with 1*105 MOLM-13 cells. Beforehand, AML cells were cultured alone or in the presence of either purified ECAR or control vector modified T cells at an E:T ratio of 5∶1 for 4 h. Prior to the experiment, T cells were irradiated at 5 Gy to prevent xenograft reaction in recipient mice [50] . Mice were sacrificed when visible tumors developed at injection site and single-cell suspensions from bone marrow obtained from femur and tibia of the left hind leg were prepared. Erythrocytes were removed by lysis and nucleated cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45.1/PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, clone A20), anti-human CD3/APC-eFluor780 (eBioscience, clone SK7), CD19/APC (BD Bioscience, clone HIB19), CD33/PE (eBiosience, clone HIM3-4), and CD45/AlexaFluor700 (Biolegend, clone HI30) mabs. Doublet discrimination was routinely carried out and dead cells were excluded by 4, 6 diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-staining (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). All measurements were performed on a BD LSRII FACS machine (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was realized using FlowJo-software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!