The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Sourced in United States

The F8807 is a laboratory centrifuge designed for general-purpose applications in scientific research and clinical settings. It offers variable speed control, digital display, and a compact benchtop design.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using f8807

1

Characterization of Point Spread Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As depicted in Supplementary Fig. 3a, the PSF was recorded by imaging fluorescent beads (Thermo Fisher, F8807) immobilized on the surface of a coverslip with Poly-L-Lysine coating (Sigma, P4707). The total scanning range of the lightsheet for PSF recording is 10 μm with a z-step size of 100 nm. The axial profile of the Beesel beam presented in Supplementary Fig. 3b was acquired by imaging the fluorescence of Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher, A30679) dissolved in PBS and ScaleView-A2. For the generation of the astigmatism defocusing model used in the super-resolution reconstruction, a cylindrical lens pair, as described in the methods, was inserted between the tube lens and camera. The step size was set as 20 nm for the fitting when using the defocusing model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Cell Mechanics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass coverslips were activated with 3-APTMS for 5 min and fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Hydrophobic coverslips were made by treatment with Sigmacote. Soft (792 Pa) polyacrylamide hydrogels were made by polymerizing (final concentrations of 5% acrylamide and 0.1% bis-acrylamide with 0.5% dark red fluorescent beads, 0.2 um; Thermo Fisher Scientific F8807) gel in a sandwich between the functionalized and hydrophobic coverslips. Gels were allowed to polymerize for 30 min at room temperature, the sandwich separated and washed. The surface of the gel was functionalized with 0.5 mg/mL sulfo-SANPAH in 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.2 under UV light for 10 min. Gels were extensively washed and then incubated with 50 ug/mL collagen 1 in 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.2 overnight at four degrees Celsius. The next day, gels were washed and equilibrated in DMEM. Cells were plated sparsely and allowed to adhere and spread overnight. During microscopy, cells were kept at 37 degrees and under 5% CO2 in an incubated plate holder. Images were taken before and after trypsinization, and bead displacements calculated with a Matlab program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Correlative Light-Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For correlative light-electron microscopy (CLEM) the samples were adsorbed to glow discharged carbon coated nickel grids (EMS 215–412-8400), washed 3× with PBS and fixed with 2.5% Glutaraldehyde in PBS. After 3× washes with PBS 0.2 µm latex beads (ThermoFisher F8807, diluted 1:100) were adsorbed to each grid, followed by 3× washing in PBS and fixation in 2.5% Glutaraldehyde. The grids were placed face down in water in glass bottom dishes (MatTek, 35 mm, No.1.5) and investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Fluorescence and DIC images were acquired with a Nikon A1+ confocal microscope with a 60×/1.4 oil immersion objective at Nyquist sampling rate (42 nm/pixel). Thereafter 20 iterations of Richardson-Lucy deconvolution (Nikon NIS-Elements v.4.51) were applied for image restoration. After CLSM the grids were stained with 1% uranyl acetate in water and investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The central grid area was used for re-localization in TEM. TEM images were acquired either with a SIS Veleta camera mounted on a FEI Tecnai G20 microscope or with a Gatan MSC794 camera mounted on a Philips CM120 microscope operated at 80 kV. Overlays and alignment were done manually in Photoshop CC 2015 (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Axial Calibration Using Fluorescent Nanospheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed axial calibration using red fluorescent nanospheres (F8807, Thermo Fisher). We scanned the nanospheres across a 2-µm axial range with an interval of 20 nm. Then, we used maximum likelihood estimation [28 (link)] to fit an anisotropic 2D Gaussian function to the image of the nanosphere in each frame. Finally, we plotted a calibration curve of the Gaussian sigma as a function of the nanosphere’s axial position relative to the objective lens (Fig. S1B.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Substrate Preparation for Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass or polystyrene culture dishes were coated with 10‐µg/ml fibronectin with or without the addition of 50‐µg/ml TTR fibrils or native tetramer in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) solution. Dishes were coated for 2 h in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator before cell plating.
Microgrooved substrates were prepared by molding 400 kPa polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) from a parylene template to produce spaced grooves as done previously, with grooves 10‐µm wide, 5‐µm high, and ridges 10‐µm wide (Motlagh, Senyo, et al., 2003 (link)). Before coating with fibronectin or TTR fibrils, PDMS microgroove substrates were functionalized with 3‐aminopropyl triethoxysilane (Sigma‐Aldrich cat# 440140).
Polyacrylamide (PAA) substrates with a stiffness of 10 kPa were prepared as previously described (Li et al., 2016 (link)). Before polymerization, fluorescent microspheres (Invitrogen cat# F8807) were included in substrates for later traction force microscopy (Broughton et al., 2016 (link); Ribeiro et al., 2017 (link)). PAA substrates were functionalized with Sulfo‐Sanpah (Thermo Fisher cat# 22589) before coating with fibronectin or TTR fibrils.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Silicone Gel Substrate with Fluorescent Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A thin silicone gel substrate embedded with fluorescent microspheres was prepared, as described in detail elsewhere [35 (link)] with some modifications. Briefly, a pair of liquid silicones (CY52-276A and B; Dow Corning Toray, Japan) were mixed at a weight ratio of 6 : 5 and degassed. The mixture was spread on a 22 × 22 mm coverslip (Matsunami) using a spin coater (LH-D7; MIKASA, Japan). The thickness of the silicone layer was less than 50 μm. A 35 mm plastic dish with a hole (14 mm in diameter) at the bottom (Matsunami) was assembled with the silicone-coated coverslip by curing the silicone at 70°C for 30 minutes. Assembled silicone substrate-bottom dishes were kept in a hermetically sealed case with a 100 μL aliquot of liquid silane (3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane; Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Japan) for 1 h to attach the silane to the surface of the silicone substrate by vapor deposition. A 250 μL aliquot of a solution containing dark red fluorescent microspheres (0.2 μm in diameter, with peak excitation and emission wavelengths of 660 and 680 nm, resp., F-8807; Invitrogen, USA) diluted 400 times with distilled water was added to the solidified silicone. After approximately 10 minutes, the substrate was washed with distilled water. Young's modulus of the silicone substrate was typically 1.0 kPa [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Microtubule Width

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The best focus planes for isolated microtubules were manually selected from z-stacks. 2.5 μm lineplots were drawn across isolated microtubules in this single plane image using Fiji53 . Small rectangular background areas were manually drawn to obtain the background values around selected microtubule lines. Average background was subtracted from the lineplot values. Gaussian curves were fit to the background-subtracted values and FWHM was calculated based on the fits and average values were obtained by analyzing 30–45 lineplots from 5 images per condition using a Python script. A similar calculation was performed for 200 nm dark red fluosphere beads (Invitrogen #F8807). Distributions were displayed as box plots. Lineplots with multiple discernible peaks were discarded. Two-sample t-test was performed to check for statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Microtubule Width

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The best focus planes for isolated microtubules were manually selected from z-stacks. 2.5 μm lineplots were drawn across isolated microtubules in this single plane image using Fiji53 . Small rectangular background areas were manually drawn to obtain the background values around selected microtubule lines. Average background was subtracted from the lineplot values. Gaussian curves were fit to the background-subtracted values and FWHM was calculated based on the fits and average values were obtained by analyzing 30–45 lineplots from 5 images per condition using a Python script. A similar calculation was performed for 200 nm dark red fluosphere beads (Invitrogen #F8807). Distributions were displayed as box plots. Lineplots with multiple discernible peaks were discarded. Two-sample t-test was performed to check for statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!