The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Milkoscan 203

Manufactured by Foss
Sourced in Denmark

The Milkoscan 203 is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis of milk and dairy products. It is a compact and user-friendly device that utilizes infrared spectroscopy technology to measure the composition of various milk components, such as fat, protein, and lactose, with high accuracy and reliability.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using milkoscan 203

1

Milk Yield and Composition Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milking was conducted at 07·30 h each morning and 15·30 h each evening. Milk yield per cow (kg) was recorded at each milking and milk composition (fat, protein and lactose concentrations) from each cow was measured twice weekly on a successive morning and evening milking using a Milkoscan 203 (Foss Electric DK-3400, Hillerød, Denmark). Solids-corrected milk yield was calculated using the equation of Tyrell & Reid (1965 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dairy Cow Milk Production Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cows were milked twice daily at approximately 0700 and 1530 h. Weekly milk production was derived from individual milk yields (kg) recorded at each milking (Dairymaster, Causeway). Milk fat, protein, and lactose concentrations were determined once weekly from a consecutive evening and morning milk sample for each cow and tested using infrared spectrophotometry (Milkoscan 203, Foss Electric). Milk solids yield per cow (kg fat + protein; MSo) and solids-corrected milk (SCM; Tyrrell and Reid, 1965) (link) were also calculated. Cows were weighed in the week before, during the week of, and in the week after the DMI measurement period, upon exit from the parlor after morning milking using an electronic scale (Tru-Test Ltd.) . Body condition score was assessed on the same timeline as cow BW, by the same individual throughout the study on a scale of 1 to 5 in increments of 0.25 (where 1 = emaciated, 5 = extremely fat) as outlined by Edmonson et al. (1989) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dairy Cow Lactation Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cows were milked twice daily throughout lactation across the 3 yr of the study. Milking took place at 0700 and 1530 h daily. Weekly milk production was derived from individual cow milk yield (kg) recorded at each milking (Dairymaster, Causeway, Co. Kerry, Ireland). Milk fat, protein, and lactose concentrations were determined in successive evening and morning samples of milk each week using Milkoscan 203 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) and weekly fat, protein, and lactose yields were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dairy Cow Milk Production Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cows were milked twice daily at approximately 0700 and 1530 h. Weekly milk production was derived from individual milk yields (kg) recorded at each milking (Dairymaster). Milk fat, protein, and lactose contents were determined once weekly from a consecutive p.m. and a.m. milk sample for each cow and tested using infrared spectrophotometry (Milkoscan 203, Foss Electric) . Milk solids (kg of fat + protein; MSo) yield per cow and solids-corrected milk (SCM; Tyrrell and Reid, 1965) (link) were also calculated. For the purpose of this experiment, only milk production data relating to the weeks of the DMI measurement periods are presented. Full-lactation milk production results can be found in McClearn et al. (2019) . Cows were weighed in the week before, during the week of, and in the week after the DMI measurement period upon exit from the milking parlor using an electronic scale (Tru-Test Ltd.). Body condition score was assessed, in a similar manner, by the same individual throughout the study on a scale of 1 to 5 in increments of 0.25 (where 1 = emaciated and 5 = extremely fat) as outlined by Edmonson et al. (1989) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dairy Cow Milking and Body Condition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cows were milked twice daily at 0700 and 1530 h. Individual yields (kg/cow) were recorded at each milking (Dairymaster, Causeway, Ireland). Milk composition was measured weekly from one successive evening and morning milking. The concentrations of protein, fat, and lactose were determined using a Milkoscan 203 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) .
Body weight and BCS were measured on a weekly basis. All cows were weighed using an electronic portable weighing scale and Winweigh software package (Tru-Test Limited, Auckland, New Zealand). Body condition score was recorded weekly and was scored by an experienced independent observer using a 1 to 5 scale (1 = emaciated and 5 = extremely fat) with 0.25 increments (Edmonson et al., 1989) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Milk Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Duplicate bulk tank milk samples and duplicate milk line samples were analyzed daily for fat, protein and lactose composition and SCC using a Milkoscan 203 (Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark) .
Duplicate bulk storage tank milk samples were submitted for wet chemistry analysis of nitrogen fractions after storage for 0, 48 and 96 h. The percentage total protein, NPN, and noncasein nitrogen content of the milk samples were determined using the Kjeldahl method [methods 20-3 (IDF, 2004b ), 20-4 (IDF, 2001 ), and 29-1 (IDF, 2004a) , respectively] using a Tecator Digestor Auto and Kjeltec 8400 distiller (Foss Electric).
The protein composition of duplicate bulk storage tank milk samples was quantified daily (0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) by HPLC using the method described by Mounsey and O'Kennedy (2009) . Briefly, 200 μL of milk was diluted in 3,800 μL of dissociating buffer (7 M urea and 20 mM Bis-Tris propane, pH 7.5), to which 5 μL of 2-mercaptoethanol was added, before filtering through a 0.22-μm filter. Separation of the milk protein fractions was achieved in reverse-phase mode, using an Agilent Poroshell 300SB C18 column (2.1 × 75 mm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The HPLC equipment consisted of an Agilent 1200s with quaternary pump and multi-wavelength detector. Gradient elution and peak detection were performed according to the method of Mounsey and O'Kennedy (2009) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!