The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using chemotaxis tool

1

Quantifying Chemotaxis of Dendritic Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDCs were mixed with collagen matrix to a final concentration of 3 × 106 cells/ml, and seeded into the narrow channel (observation area) of an μ-slide chemotaxis chamber (80326; Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany). The narrow channel separates the left and right reservoirs, one of which was supplemented with CCL21 (250-13; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, Connecticut, USA). For the duration of 2–4 h, pictures were taken at 2-min intervals by phase-contrast microscopy. Sixteen randomly selected cells were manually tracked in each assay, and cell migration tracks were analyzed using the ImageJ (NIH) software with the Manual Tracking plug-in and the Chemotaxis Tool plug-in from Ibidi.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Time-lapse Imaging of Cell Motility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were filmed in media containing Hoechst (50 ng/mL) using ImageXpress Micro XLS (Molecular Devices LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with the enviromental control active (humidity, temperature, CO2). Pixel size was 0.325 µm, and the image size was 702 × 702 µm. The images were taken with a 20× objective, binning 1, at 10 min intervals for 24 h. Thereafter, the trajectories were generated using the FIJI (https://fiji.sc/, [39 (link)]) “Manual Tracking” plug-in and quantified through the “Chemotaxis Tool” (http://ibidi.com/software/chemotaxis_and_migration_tool/, Ibidi GmbH, Martinsried, Germany) plug in. The quantities used here were the mean values of the instantaneous speed as well as the persistence (called the directionality), and defined as the ratio of the Euclidian length of the trajectory over its total length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sprague Dawley Rat Schwann Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Sprague Dawley rat SCs were ordered from the Cell Bank of Typical Culture Collection of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China), and being cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, Gibco, USA), which was supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sijiqing Inc., Hangzhou, China), 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin.
All the samples were sterilized with 75% ethanol. After washed with PBS, they were seeded with SCs (2 × 104 cells/cm2), and were observed by SEM 12 h later [17 (link)]. The adhesion SCs number on PLCL films was calculated based on the photos taken by a fluorescence microscope (IX81, Olympus, Japan) [17 (link)]. The elongated SCs was measured using the Image Pro Plus software.
The migration of SCs was determined according to the method reported previously [16 (link)]. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells/cm2 SCs were seeded on each film, which was placed in a small incubation chamber and observed in situ by a time-lapse phase-contrast microscope (DMI6000B, Leica). The reconstructed trajectories, migration distance and rate of SCs were obtained by NIH Image J software and Chemotaxis Tool (Ibidi, Germany). The migration rates in parallel (V//) directions, and the net displacement of SCs were calculated respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cell Polarity and Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polarity and focal adhesion number and size (represented as cellular adhesive area) were quantified as described elsewhere [33 (link)]. Briefly, to quantify cell polarity (axis ratio), cells were fixed, stained and images acquired in the Leica SP8 confocal microscope as described before. For each individual cell, the axis ratio was calculated dividing the length of the long, migration-defined axis by the perpendicular axis passing by the nucleus of the cell. For adhesion analysis, we obtained images as before. We then used ImageJ [53 (link)] to subtract background, applied the CLAHE (Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization) algorithm to create a high-contrast image that was subject to the threshold command of ImageJ and quantified using the Analyze Particles ImageJ built-in feature. % of adhesive areas was obtained by dividing the adhesive area of the cell determined as described above divided by the total area of the cell determined manually.
For migration assays, the centroids of migrating cells were determined using the “Manual Tracking” plugin for ImageJ, transferred and plotted using Chemotaxis tool from Ibidi. Velocities were determined using the same software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fibroblast Adhesion and Migration Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblasts were seeded with a cell density of 10 6 cells (in 4 mL per well) onto non-TCP (previously functionalised with pluronic F127 and already patterned with fibronectin as described above) and left two hours for adhesion to the substrate. A media lacking in fetal calf serum (FCS) was used to avoid any interaction between the fibronectin and the other proteins present in the media. After two hours cells were washed abundantly with PBS and then the media replaced. Time-lapsed fluorescent micrographs images were taken at 24 h, which were subsequently analysed with the Chemotaxis tool (ibidi) for Image J (National Institute of Heath).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neutrophil chemotaxis analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemotaxis was analyzed with neutrophils resuspended in HBSS supplemented with 15mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and 0.05% fatty acid and endotoxin-free BSA. For integrin-dependent chemotaxis, neutrophil migration on a glass bridge was monitored by time lapse-imaging for 30 minutes in Dunn chambers (Hawksley, Lancing, UK). Dunn chambers were assembled as previously described (21 (link)) with 300nM fMLF as the chemoattractant. For integrin-independent chemotaxis, neutrophils were mixed with a 3D collagen matrix (A1048301, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), which was prepared as per manufacturer’s instructions, and left to polymerize in a humidified incubator at 37°C at 5% CO2 before cells were allowed to migrate towards 300nM fMLF in Chemotaxis μ-slides (Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany). Images were acquired on a Leica IRB inverted microscope with temperature-controlled chamber, automated stage (Prior, Cambridge UK), Orca camera (Hamamatsu, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and Micromanager image acquisition software (Fiji). Paths of individual cells were tracked using the manual tracking plug-in into Image J and tracks analyzed using the Chemotaxis Tool (Ibidi) plug-in into Image J as described (19 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neutrophil Chemotaxis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For chemotaxis assays, neutrophils were resuspended in HBSS supplemented with 15 mM HEPES pH 7.4 and 0.05% fatty acid and endotoxin-free BSA. Dunn chambers were assembled as described (21 (link)), and chemotaxis assays were carried out with MIP2 (R&D Systems) as chemoattractant. Cells were monitored by time-lapse imaging for 30 min using an inverted RMDIB microscope (Leica) equipped with temperature-controlled chamber, automated stage (Prior), Orca camera (Hamamatsu), and Micromanager image acquisition software (Fiji). Paths of all individual neutrophils were tracked using the manual tracking plug-in into ImageJ. Tracks were subsequently analyzed using the Chemotaxis Tool (Ibidi) plug-in into Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CTHRC1 Regulates Murine Fibroblast Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Murine NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were plated on collagen type I-coated μ-slides (IBIDI USA Inc., Madison, WI) and incubated for 4 hours at 37 °C in 5 % CO2/95 % air in complete DMEM media supplemented with 10 % FBS to insure complete cell adhesion on a bridge. Subsequently, rhCTHRC1 protein (Sino Biological Inc., Beijing, China) was added at 1000 ng/ml, and imaging has been performed for 14 hours in a serum-containing medium at 37 °C using time-lapse phase contrast microscopy with a Cell Observer microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). Recorded stacks of images were transferred to ImageJ [19 (link)] and further analyzed with the MTrackJ plugin and Chemotaxis Tool (IBIDI USA Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The trajectories of individual cells were evaluated for accumulated distance migrated (Ad) and for cell velocity. Directness was calculated as a ratio of Euclidean distance (Ed) to the accumulated distance (Ed/Ad) (Fig. 6). Additionally, elongated morphology cell shape was studied (horizontal polarization), which was defined as maximal cell dimension using linear approximation. In preliminary experiments, we found that pro-motile and polarization effects of the CTHRC1 treatment were pronounced in the time window from 4–12 hours, and thereafter all calculations were performed for this time period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Neural Crest Cell Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual neural crest cells located at the edge of explants were tracked using Manual Tracking plug-in in FIJI. Tracks were analysed using Chemotaxis Tool plug-in from IBIDI to retrieve individual cell’s speed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Neutrophil Migration Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration assays were performed as described previously (45 (link)), with modifications. Briefly, Millicell EZ SLIDE 8-well glass (Millipore) or 35-mm glass-bottom dishes were coated with mouse ICAM-1 (1 or 5 μg per well, respectively; Sino Biological) and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. Naïve mouse neutrophils were isolated and placed on the slide in L-15 medium containing glucose (2 mg/ml; CellGro). Cells were allowed to adhere to the bottom of the slide, and nonadherent cells were washed off. Cells were preincubated with inhibitors for 15 to 20 min, treated with the compounds of interest, and then imaged every 10 s for 25 min. Image acquisition was conducted on a DIC-enabled microscope (Nikon or Olympus) coupled to a Hamamatsu or CoolSNAP HQ (Roper Scientific) camera. Themagnification used was ×10, ×20, or ×60. The cells were tracked with the manual tracking functionality in ImageJ software, and the tracked cells were analyzed with the Chemotaxis tool (ibidi). All cells that appeared healthy were tracked, and no thresholding criteria were applied. Velocity for each cell was calculated by dividing the total distance moved by the total migration time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!