The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using nanodrop

1

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from cells or pieces of liver was purified by the Rneasy Mini Kit from Qiagen according to manufacturer's instructions. Concentration and purity were measured on the Nanodrop (Eppendorf). cDNA was generated using the Quantitect® Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real‐time RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) was performed on an ABI StepOnePlus cycler using TaqMan probe sets purchased from Applied Biosystems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Coffee Leaf DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The young growing leaf tips of all the seven coffee species were collected and total genomic DNA was isolated using the modified CTAB protocol described by Mishra et al. (2020) (link). The DNA quality was tested by separating it on 0.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml) and quantified using Nanodrop (Eppendorf). The DNA samples were diluted to a working concentration of 10 ng/μl and stored at −20°C for future uses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Alu Repeat DNA Labeling via PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was labeled using PCR. PCR template was human Alu repeat material cloned in pUC19, this repeat encompassed the start and the end of tandemly repeated AluJ and AluY (NCBI: AC002400.1, 53494–53767). Standard M13 primers were used for amplification. PCR purification was done by standard phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation using ammonium acetate as a salt. DNA concentration and incorporation of dUTP-TAMRA were measured using Nanodrop (Eppendorf) and calculated by comparing the signal before and after PCR re-precipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Gene Expression in Muscle Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right PMM was collected in RNAlater (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and stored at −80°C until further processing (Zammit et al., 2006 (link); Gu et al., 2022 (link)). RNA was extracted using RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and RNA quality was determined using the Nanodrop (Eppendorf, Enfield, CT). cDNA was synthesized using the iScript reverse transcriptase kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Specific primers for candidate genes (MYF5, MRF4, FGF2, FGF4, IGF1, IGF1R, MYOD, and MYOG) were selected from published literature (Mitchell et al., 1999 (link); Zammit et al., 2006 (link); Al-Musawi et al., 2011 (link); Davis et al., 2015 ; Harding et al., 2016 (link)). RT-qPCR was performed on the StepOnePlus platform using the SYBR green assay (Applied Biosystems, CA) under custom thermal cycling conditions. Duplicate samples were run from each biological sample and a total of 8 to 10 biological replicates from each treatment group were included in the assay. Data were normalized to the endogenous control (GAPDH), and comparative quantification (2−ΔΔCT) was carried out to detect changes in relative gene expression between the treatment and control samples (Bookout and Mangelsdorf, 2003 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Gut Microbiome Analysis via Fecal DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice from different groups were separated for feces collection. The total genomic DNA from each fecal sample (200 mg) was extracted using a TIAamp DNA stool mini-kit according to the manufacturer's instructions, resuspended in 40 ml of TE buffer (pH 8.0) and quantified with an Eppendorf Nanodrop. These samples were analyzed with the qPCR assay (primers used were listed in Table S1), and the Ct values were used to calculate the proportion of bacterial taxa in the feces as described previously (Yang et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Oomycetes DNA Extraction and PCR Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Oomycetes genomic DNA was isolated following the protocol of the Sarkosyl method (Sambrook and Russel, 2001). The quality of extracted DNA was checked in 1% agarose gel and quantified using Nanodrop (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The ITS1 primer including forward and reverse primers were used for amplification- and confirmation-specific site of A. invadans isolate located in the ITS1 region using thermal cycler Gene Amp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) (Table 1). The PCR mixture consisted of 25 pM of each primer, deoxynucleoside triphosphate at the concentration of 2.5 mM, 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase and 20 ng of A. invadans genomic DNA for a total of 50 µL reaction volume to the following cyclic condition: 95 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C each, 56 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 2.5 min and 72 °C at 5 min for the final extension. The agarose gel electrophoresis analyzes the PCR product and the target product is 234 bp (Figure 2) (Vandersea et al. 2006). The PCR products are sequenced in forward and reverse direction and contig was prepared by aligning forward and reverse sequences using DNA baser 7.0.0. Afterward, the sequence was compared with available sequences in species of Oomycetes and fungal family in the NCBI GenBank with BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) accessed on 14 June 2022.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA was extracted from 1.0 g leaf material following CTAB method35 and then purified by using the Thermo Scientific GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (# K0722). DNA quality was examined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose and quantified with a Nanodrop (Eppendorf, USA). The purified genomic DNA was stored at − 20 °C for PCR amplification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Amplification of Mouse nDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
nDNA was isolated from liver tissues of mice used for immunotoxicity studies, as per the manufacturer's protocol (Sigma, USA). The quantity and quality of the isolated nDNA were estimated (nanodrop, Eppendorf, Germany). nDNA isolated from in vivo experimental groups was amplified using mouse β actin specific forward primer (f-GCGTGGGGACAGCCGCATCTT) and reverse primer (r-ATCGGCAGAAGGGGCGGAGA) (Eurogentec, Belgium, Accession number HQ675031.1) at a concentration of 100 ng/μL per reaction mixture. PCR of nDNA was carried out as per standard conditions [30 (link)] in Eppendorf master cycler; Germany. Purity and integrity of the amplified products were checked by purity factor (260/280 nm) and agarose gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PCR Labeling of Alu Repeats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was labeled using PCR. PCR template was human Alu repeat material cloned in pUC19, this repeat encompassed the start and the end of tandemly repeated AluJ and AluY (NCBI: AC002400.1, 53494–53767). Standard M13 primers were used for amplification. PCR purification was done by phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation using ammonium acetate as a salt. DNA concentration and incorporation of dUTP-TAMRA were measured using Nanodrop (Eppendorf) and calculated by comparing the signal before and after PCR re-precipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genomic DNA Extraction and Barcoding for Eryngium Genotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from the fresh leaf tissues of the two Eryngium genotypes using a plant gDNA extraction kit (GSure® Plant Mini Kit with WLN Buffer, GCC Biotech Pvt Ltd., Kolkata, India) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The gDNAs were quantified using a nanodrop (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and checked on 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis (Tarson, Kolkata, India). The gDNA concentration was adjusted to 50 ng µL−1, and was used for PCR amplification with the DNA barcode primers, matK, Kim matK, rbcL, and ITS, as recommended by the Consortium of Barcode of Life–Plant Group [14 (link)]. The details of the barcode primers are presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!