The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 13.0 statistics software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 13.0 is a comprehensive software package for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The core function of SPSS 13.0 is to enable users to perform various statistical tests, including regression analysis, factor analysis, and hypothesis testing, among others. The software is designed to handle large data sets and offers a user-friendly interface.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

16 protocols using spss 13.0 statistics software

1

Quantifying LIN28A and RUNX2 Correlation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental data are presented as the mean ± SD and all experiments were repeated at least three times. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 13.0 Statistics Software (SPSS, Inc.). An unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze results between two groups and one-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey's post hoc test was applied to analyze results among ≥ three groups. Pearson's correlation analysis was utilized to confirm the correlation between LIN28A and RUNX2. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Apoptosis Regulation in Tissue Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are shown as mean value ± standard deviation (μ±±SD). The differences between 2 samples, such as expression of Bax, Bcl-2, Bax/Bcl-2, TGF-β1 type III Collagen, were analyzed by using the t test. ANOVA was used for comparison among multiple groups. The association between 2 samples of Bax/Bcl-2, TGF-β1, and Type III collagen was analyzed by means of linear correlation. All statistical analysis was done using SPSS 13.0 statistics software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p<0.05 was considered as statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was performed to compare the differences among the 5 groups with post hoc LSD test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Survival Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD, and categorical data were presented as frequency. Continuous data analysis was performed using the independent t test for parametric variables. Multiple groups were compared using ANOVA, which pairwise comparisons using LSD method. Nonparametric variables analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney test. Categorical data were calculated using Pearson Chi-square test.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared by employing the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional-hazard model. The cut-off point of each continuous parameter was determined through receiver-operating characteristic curve and Youden index, using PFS as the classification status. The Kaplan–Meier was used for univariate analysis. The Cox proportional-hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 13.0 statistics software was used for statistical analysis.
The correlation of each 2 parameters was calculated and compared. The correlation coefficient (R value) = 0.21–0.40 for the poor consistency, R value = 0.41–0.60 for the general consistency, R value = 0.61–0.80 for the good consistency, and R value = 0.81–1.00 for the excellent consistency. P < .05 were assumed to indicate significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Robust Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and processed with SPSS 13.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Differences between 2 groups were assessed by Student t test, and 1- or 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey post hoc test was used for multiple comparisons. Differences were analyzed using ANOVA. A value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy of Compound X

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data are expressed as mean ± SD, where the error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. Student’s t test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to calculate the statistical significance. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc, U.S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Unigene Coding Region Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The open reading frames (ORFs) in each unigene sequence were predicted by searching against protein databases using BLASTX (E-value ≤1e−5) in the following order: Nr, SwissProt, KEGG, and COG. Sequences having hits in the former database did not go to the next round of searching against a later database. The coding regions were then extracted according to the best BLASTX match with a custom Perl script. CodonW (http://codonw.sourceforge.net/) (Peden 1999 ) was used to analyze RSCU and GC3 of ORFs (≥150 nt). Perl scripts were used to process the output files of CodonW. We used SPSS 13.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for correlation analysis.
NC and CAI were calculated by DAMBE (Xia 2013 ) using the Delia antiqua ribosomal proteins codon usage table as the reference when calculated CAI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Cytotoxicity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. The data were performed by SPSS13.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The significance of differences between groups was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extracting and Analyzing ORFs from Unigene Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ORFs in each unigene sequence was predicted by BLAST against protein databases using BLASTX (E-value < = 1e-5) in the following order: Nr, SwissProt, KEGG, COG. Sequences with hits in former databases would not go to next round search against later database. The coding regions were then extracted according to the best BLASTX match with a custom perl script. We analyzed GC content and codon usage bias of ORFs longer than 150 nt by CodonW (http://codonw.sourceforge.net/), and processed the output files of Codonw with a perl script. The correlation analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 statistics software (http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis Methodology in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS13.0 statistics software was used for analysis. Measurement data were expressed with x̄±s, and independent t test was used for intra-group comparison. Enumeration data were expressed with frequency and percentage, and χ2 (link) test was adopted for inter-group comparison. P<0.05 means differences have statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!