The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti cftr

1

CFTR and COX Antibody Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti-CFTR antibodies used were sc-10747, anti-CFTR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas TX), and anti-CFTR MAB3484 (Millipore, Etobicoke, ON Canada). The COX1 antibody used was the anti-COX1 antibody EPR5866 (AB109025 Abcam Cambridge, UK), and the COX-2 antibody used was the anti-COX-2 antibody EPR12012 (AB179800 Abcam Cambridge, UK) and hemagglutinin tag (H-9658 Sigma St. Louis, MO) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histopathological Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin embedded tissues were sliced and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. For each animal, ten randomly chosen microscopic fields were investigated under a light microscope. For quantification of oedema, necrosis and leucocyte infiltration, a modified histopathologic score adapted from Kyogoku et al 39 was used, that scored 0 for absent, 1 for less than 20%, 2 for 20%‐50% and 3 for more than 50% as previously described.40 Immunohistochemistry was performed from paraffin embedded tissue samples as previously reported. The following primary antibodies were used in a dilution of 1 to 200: anti‐CFTR (Clone: A‐3, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc‐376683), p67‐phox (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc‐374510) and anti‐CD11b (abcam, ab133357). For immunofluorescence staining of CFTR snap‐frozen tissue embedded with Tissue‐Tek® OCTTM compound (Sakura Finetek, Alphen aan den Rijn) was cut into 1‐ to 2‐µm‐thick slices, fixed with 20% acetone and washed with PBS. The anti‐CFTR antibody (Clone: M3A7, DLN‐06996, Dianova) was used in a 1:100 dilution in 20% FCS, and incubation was performed over night at 4°C. An anti‐rat IgG FITC‐labelled antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) served as a secondary antibody. Nuclei were stained by DAPI and slides were mounted with DACO mounting medium (Agilent Technologies Inc) for immunofluorescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Monitoring Intracellular pH Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and forskolin were purchased from Sigma. pH-sensitive fluorescent dye, 2′,7′-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxy-fluorescein acetoxymethyl ester (BCECF-AM), was from Invitrogen. Anti-CFTR, anti-SLC26A6, anti-P38, anti-phospho-P38, and anti-β-actin antibodies were from Santa Cruz. All other chemicals in solutions were obtained from Sigma and Calbiochem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CFTR and PTH1R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caco-2 or T84 cells were grown on coverslips in 6-well plates for 7 days. Culture medium was removed from the wells, and cells on coverslips were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed with iced-cold 100% methanol for 5 min. Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS followed by 5-min washing with PBS. Non-specific bindings were blocked by 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS for 2 h. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies, i.e., 1:20 rabbit polyclonal anti-CFTR (catalog no. Sc-10747; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or 1:20 rabbit polyclonal anti-PTH1R (catalog no. Sc-20749; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C. Thereafter, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with secondary antibody, i.e., goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with biotin (catalog no. Sc-2040; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), for 1 h at room temperature, followed by 1 h incubation with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (catalog no. SA10001; Invitrogen, CA, USA). Finally, cells were incubated with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine chromogen (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and were visualized by a light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!