The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

114 protocols using portable stadiometer

1

Biomarker Profiling in Insulin Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
hsCRP is an inflammatory marker that is found to be high in the setting of insulin resistance and depression. hsCRP was measured by Quest Laboratories using an immunoturbidimetric assay.
For descriptive purposes only we also assessed lipids and anthropometrics over time. High density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TGL), and total cholesterol were measured in mg/dL by Quest Laboratories with a spectrophotometry assay from Beckman Coulter. LDL was calculated using the Martin–Hopkins calculation31 (link). Weight was measured using a calibrated electronic Seca (Chino, California) digital scale. Height was measured with the Seca portable stadiometer, with the participant’s head positioned in the Frankfurt horizontal plane. Waist circumference was measured at the umbilicus with an inelastic tape. Blood pressure was measured twice with calibrated digital sphygmomanometer (Omron, Hoffman Estates, IL)32 (link). For all measurements, discrepant values of two trials exceeding a predetermined allowance triggered a third measurement and the two closest values were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Health Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The general information questionnaire was obtained by interviewing and filling out information including age, marital status, family income, vitamin D and calcium supplementation, smoking, and alcohol consumption. The midwifery questionnaire was filled with questions about the number of deliveries, the years spent after menopause, breastfeeding history, and history of injectable contraceptives. Weight and height were measured without wearing shoes with light clothing. Weight was measured using digital scales (Seca, Germany) with an accuracy of 0.1 kg. Height was measured using a stadiometer (Seca portable stadiometer) with a measurement accuracy of 0.1 cm. BMI was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by square of height (m). The international valid physical activity questionnaire‐Short Form (IPAQ‐S), which has been validated and approved in Iran, was used to measure physical activity (BashiriMoosavi et al., 2015 ) and the rate of metabolic equivalent of task (MET)‐min/week was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anthropometric Measurements of Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Research staff use standard techniques for measuring height, weight, and waist circumference of consented children [75 ]. The research staff member conducting measurements sets up equipment in a space visible to, but located away from the main activities. Children who assent come to the area to be measured one at a time. Height is measured using a SECA portable stadiometer to the nearest 8th of an inch. Weight is measured using a Tanita digital scale to one decimal place. Waist circumference is measured to the nearest 8th of an inch by holding a standard tape measure around the child’s waist parallel to the floor at the top of their right ilium according to the CDC NHANES protocol [76 ]. The series of three measurements is repeated a total of 3 times and averaged for each child.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assessment of body mass, stature and sitting height was completed with participants barefoot and in light clothing. Body mass was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg (Tanita electronic scale; Tanita Corp, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) and both stature and sitting height were recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm (Seca Portable Stadiometer; Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Right calf circumferences were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, using an anthropometric tape, following the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry protocol (Norton & Olds, 1996 ). Body composition (fat mass and fat‐free mass) was assessed from a whole‐body dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan (Horizon DXA System, Hologic Canada ULC, Mississauga, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The participant’s body weight was assessed in duplicate using a Tanita digital scale (Arlington Heights, IL) wearing light clothing and no shoes. Height was measured in duplicate using a seca portable stadiometer (Issaquah, WA). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2. Waist circumference was measured on bare skin in duplicate at the level midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest, with the participant breathing out gently. Body fat was assessed via Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). A whole-body DXA scan allowed us to quantify the amount of adipose tissue in the abdominal area and throughout the entire body. The DXA measurements were conducted using the DXA GE iLunar Body Composition Scanner (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Anthropometric Measurements and BMI Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height and weight were measured using a Seca portable stadiometer (Seca North America, Chino, CA) and InBody 270 scale (InBody USA, Cerritos, CA), with a person standing without shoes or heavy clothing. Results were reported in inches and pounds (lbs), respectively.
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight × 703/(height)2 and reported in kg/m2. Overweight was defined as BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2, and obesity as BMI > 30 kg/m2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Clinical and Anthropometric Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient characteristics, i.e., gender, date of birth (age), underlying disease, the main affected organ, comorbidity, the number of different prescriptions per day, and history of ICU stay and surgery were recorded. The length of hospital stay was calculated for discharged patients from the date of admission and date of the survey. Body weight was measured by standard Seca scale (Seca 620, Germany) in light clothes to the nearest 1 kg. Body height was assessed by Seca portable stadiometer (Seca 213, Germany) to the nearest 1 cm. Mid-arm circumference (MAC) was measured in mid-acromion and olecranon process interval at the non-dominant relaxed arm with a non-stretchable tape measure to the nearest 0.1 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Standardized Anthropometric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured on a hard floor surface using a calibrated electronic Seca (Chino, California) digital scale, after removing heavy clothing, pocket items, and shoes. Height was measured with the Seca portable stadiometer, with the participant’s head positioned in the Frankfurt horizontal plane, after removing shoes. Waist circumference was measured twice at the umbilicus with an inelastic tape. Following recommended procedures [61 (link)], blood pressure was measured twice with calibrated digital sphygmomanometer (Omron, Hoffman Estates, IL). For all measurements, discrepant values exceeding a predetermined allowance triggered a third measurement and the two closest values were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized Anthropometric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weight was measured on a hard floor surface using a calibrated electronic Seca (Chino, California) digital scale, after removing heavy clothing, pocket items, and shoes. Height was measured with the Seca portable stadiometer, with the participant’s head positioned in the Frankfurt horizontal plane, after removing shoes. Waist circumference was measured twice at the umbilicus with an inelastic tape. Following recommended procedures [61 (link)], blood pressure was measured twice with calibrated digital sphygmomanometer (Omron, Hoffman Estates, IL). For all measurements, discrepant values exceeding a predetermined allowance triggered a third measurement and the two closest values were averaged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Anthropometric and Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body height and weight were objectively measured using Seca portable stadiometer and digital scale with a precision of 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg. Body height was measured in bare or stocking feet standing upright against a stadiometer and body weight with wearing light clothes with no shoes. Body mass index was calculated (weight [kg]/height [m]2). Waist circumference was measured using anthropometric tape placed horizontally midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest at the end of normal expiration, while the participant was standing still [25 (link)]. Waist-to-height ratio was calculated by dividing waist circumference with body height (in cm). To assess fat mass and fat-free mass, we used bioelectrical impedance analysis (Omron BF500 Body Composition Monitor, Omron Medizintechnik, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The device uses eight electrodes and pre-programmed equations to determine fat mass. The participant was required to stand on metal footpads barefoot and grasp a pair of electrodes fixed on a handle with arms extended in front of the chest [26 (link)]. Sex and age were self-reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!