The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

79 protocols using transbond xt

1

Comparison of Lingual Bracket Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A full-size preformed lingual straight archwire was used to align the 7G and STb brackets at the origin position; these brackets were then bonded to the lingual tooth surface by curing Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA).7 (link)10 (link)24 (link) Then, 0.016-inch copper nickel-titanium (Cu-NiTi) preformed straight lingual archwires (STb straight wire small, 204–2101; Ormco) were inserted for the experiment. After Incognito brackets were bonded using their own incisal or occlusal rest and Transbond XT, a customized bent 0.016-inch superelastic NiTi archwire (SE-NiTi; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was inserted for the experiment (Table 1 and Figure 2).5 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ceramic Bracket Bonding Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The buccal surface of the crown of each tooth was then divided to mesial and distal sides by a hypothetical center line. Eighteen monocrystalline ceramic brackets (Radiance, American orthodontics, USA) were bonded randomly on mesial or distal sides (6 sides, either mesial or distal, remained free) by curing a Transbond XT composite resin (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) with LED (Demi, kerr Co., USA) for 40 s (10 s for each side of bracket) [Figure 1] after removing the excess resin. Surfaces had been etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel (Transbond XT, Eching Gel, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) for 15 s, rinsed for 20 s, and then dried by moisture- and oil-free air before bonding the brackets. The samples were then kept in distilled water bath set at 37°C for 24 h. Following thermocycling for 1000 cycles and temperatures between 5°C and 55°C, the brackets were divided into 3 groups of 6 (control, 1w, and 3w power laser), randomly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Orthodontic Bracket Bonding Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All teeth were cleaned with water and fluoride-free pumice for at least 30 s and then dried with an oil-free air syringe. The enamel was then etched for 30 s with 37% orthophosphoric acid (etching gel, 3M, Monrovia, CA, USA), and the Primer (Transbond XT, 3M, Monrovia, CA, USA) was applied with a small brush and spread with oil-free compressed air. The composite (Transbond XT, 3M, Monrovia, CA, USA) was applied on the bracket base, and the attachment was positioned on the tooth surface. Composite excess was removed with a probe before polymerization. The composite was polymerized with a LED lamp (Opticore L3; Marslev Byvej, Denmark) for 80 s per bracket (20 s for side: mesial, distal, occlusal and gingival).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibacterial Adhesive Formulations Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The three antibacterial monomers have been synthesized using a method similar to the previously reported.13 The structures of the monomers are shown in Figure 1. They contain the same polymerizable group (methacrylate) and alkyl-dimethyl-benzyl ammonium fluoride, a quaternary ammonium salt (QAS), but different lengths of aliphatic chain between the two functional groups.
Structures of antibacterial monomers. Source: Reynolds<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17"><sup>17</sup></xref>, 1975.To formulate the experimental adhesives, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, CA, USA) was mixed with three different monomers, which resulted in four experimental groups, replacing 5% of the Transbond XT: 5%C11, 3.5%C11+1.5%C2, 5%C16, 3.5%C16+1.5%C2. Transbond XT (TBXT) was used as the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bonding Ceramic Brackets to Composite Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ceramic brackets (Dentsply GAC International, NY, USA) were bonded to the surface of composite discs using an orthodontic adhesive. A thin layer of adhesive primer (Transbond XT; 3 M Unitek®, Monrovia, CA, USA) was applied on the surface in all groups that had already been etched with 37% phosphoric acid. Adhesive paste primer (Transbond XT, 3 M Unitek®, Monrovia, CA, USA) was applied on the base of the bracket, and the bracket was centered on the disc surface. While adjusting the bracket, a constant pressure was applied to minimize the resin thickness. A dental explorer was used to remove excess resin around the brackets. The adhesive was then light-cured (Woodpecker, China), with a light intensity of 850 mW/cm2 through the bracket for 5 s. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 48 h prior to the SBS test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Enamel Sealant Comparison for Orthodontic Bonding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixty freshly extracted first premolars were collected, which were mainly extracted for orthodontic purpose and having intact buccal surface. Teeth with heavy restorations, caries and pre-treated with any chemical agent were discarded. All the teeth were stored in a solution of 0.1% (wt/vol) thymol.
All the 60 teeth were randomly divided into two groups:

Group 1 (Control group) – included 30 premolars

Group 2 (Experimental group) – included 30 premolars.

After cleaning the buccal surface of all the 60 premolars with pumice powder and dried with oil – free air source, they were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel for 30 s.
On premolars in the control group a thin layer of primer (3M Transbond XT) was applied on enamel and bracket base, whereas on premolars in the experimental group a thin layer of Pro Seal was applied on enamel and bracket base. Pro Seal is a highly filled light cured sealant with following contents, ethoxylated bisphenol A diacrylate (10-50%), Urethane acrylate ester (10-40%) and plyethyleneglycoldiacrylate (10-40%) and a proprietary catalyst. The exact percentages of the products are a trade secret. The adhesive (3M Transbond XT) was then applied on the bracket base of both groups (3M Unitek – 0.022” Roth prescription) and bonding done with light cure for 20 s using light-emitting diode source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Enamel Etching Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Group I – Control Group: 60 teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. Teeth were etched for 40 seconds, rinsed and air-dried. A thin layer of Transbond XT primer (3M Unitek) was applied to the enamel surface and light-cured for 10 s. Brackets were bonded onto the center of the buccal surface of teeth with Transbond XT (3M Unitek), a light-cured composite adhesive. Before curing, the excess resin material is removed with a sharp probe without disturbing the bracket position; the adhesive was light-cured for a total of 40 seconds, following the manufacturer's instruction.
Group – II – Experimental Group: 60 teeth were etched and primed by using self-etching primer that is Transbond Plus (3M Unitek), which contains both the acid and the primer and it is applied on the enamel surface of 60 teeth for 3 s and gently evaporated with air, according to the manufacturer's instructions. For activation, the two components are squeezed together, and the resulting mix is applied directly on the tooth surface. It contains a black (largest) reservoir were squeezed into white (middle) reservoir and then into purple (smallest) reservoir of the blister package using control pressure. The brackets were bonded using Transbond XT adhesive (3M Unitek) and light-cured for 40 s, in the same manner as in Group I.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Composite Material with Ag@SiO2 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The organic matrix was prepared with BisGMA (2.2bis [4-(2-hydroxy-3-metacryloxpropoxy) - propane, ESSTECH Technology Inc., Essington, PA) and TEGDMA (2-methyl 2-propoic acid, ESSTECH) at 1:1 (mol). Photoinitiators DMAEMA (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., USA) and camphorquinone (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Germany) were added at 0.5 wt%. Barium glass was added at 70 wt% in the experimental composite without Ag@SiO2 NPs, to achieve a similar filler content of the commercial material (Transbond XT, 3M ESPE, USA). The silver nanoparticles coated with silicon dioxide were synthesized and characterized according to Rodrigues et al,20 and added to this polymeric matrix at concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, and 3% by weight. The barium glass content was adjusted accordingly, to obtain 70 wt% of the filler content for all groups. As a comparison standard, a commercial composite was also tested (Transbond XT, 3M ESPE, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bracket Bonding with Different Curing Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were prepared for bracket bonding according to the following procedures: 37% phosphoric acid gel (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) was used to etch the teeth for 30 sec. The teeth were then rinsed with water from a 3-way syringe for 30 sec and dried with an oil-free air source for 20 sec. Subsequently, the liquid primer Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) was applied to the etched surface. MBT premolar stainless-steel brackets (Victory series 3M Unitek) were bonded to teeth with Transbond XT light cure adhesive paste. Excess resin was removed with an explorer before it was polymerized and cured with the following varying procedures:
Group 1: 15 teeth were cured by conventional method of bonding by curing labially for 40 sec
Group 2: 15 teeth were cured for 50 sec by transillumination
Group 3: 15 teeth were cured labially for 20 sec followed by 30 sec of transillumination
Group 4: 15 teeth were first cured by transillumination for 30 sec followed by labial curing for 20 sec.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Enamel Etching and Bracket Bonding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
37% phosphoric acid gel (Sina Co, Iran) was placed on the enamel surface for 15 seconds, washed with water spray for 30 seconds, and dried to a chalky white appearance. The primer solution, Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif), was then applied on the etched surface, and then it was light-cured for 5 seconds. Transbond XT composite resin (3M Unitek, South Peck Road, Monrovia, California, USA) was placed on upper premolar metal brackets (Standard-022, Dentaurum, Germany); the bracket was bonded to the tooth surface perpendicular to the long axis of the buccal surface with approximately 250 g force using a manual force gauge (Tension and Compression Gauge, Dentaurum, Germany). In all groups, the brackets were light-cured by LED light-curing unit (Valo, Ultradent, USA) at a light intensity of 1000 mW/cm2 for a total of 20 seconds, with the light beam directed for 10 seconds at each of the mesial and distal faces.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!