The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software version 23.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows is a statistical analysis software package. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The software enables users to perform a variety of statistical procedures, including regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and data exploration.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

27 protocols using spss software version 23.0 for windows

1

Propensity Score Matching for Liver Disease Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To balance the confounding factors, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) using a logistic regression model for the following variables: sex and age. The two groups were matched 1:1 with a caliper of 0.001.
Normally distributed data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SDs). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Comparisons between multiple groups were made using ANOVA. The metabolism-related parameters, liver enzyme profiles, and FIB-4 scores of the study subjects were compared between SCr quartiles. We explored the correlates of HS through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis; that is, significant factors (p < 0.05) were included in the univariate regression and further validated in the multivariate regression. Covariables included sex, age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, lipid profile, and liver enzyme profile. All tests were two-tailed, and results p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov‐Smirnov test. The categorical variables are described as percentages and frequencies. Normally distributed data are presented as means ± SD unless noted otherwise. For non‐normally distributed data, median values with interquartile ranges (IQR) are shown. Data were analysed using Mann‐Whitney and Kruskal‐Wallis test for nonparametric variables and ANOVA and Student's t test for parametric variables. For categorical variables, chi‐square was used. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Factors Influencing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The filled questionnaires were checked for completeness, and responses were coded and entered into the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSSInc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics of participants' sociodemographic, disease, and CAM use characteristics were expressed in frequencies and proportions. Comparisons between CAM users and nonusers characteristics were conducted using chi-square. The association of each of those characteristics with CAM use was assessed using simple logistic regression, with CAM use as outcome variable. In order to evaluate the correlates of CAM use, a multiple logistic regression model was used. In this model, variables were included if they were significantly associated with the outcome in the univariate analysis. Odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals were computed. Statistical significance was detected by a p value less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Galectin-3 Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as means±standard deviation or medians and 25th-75th percentile values (normally and non-normally distributed, respectively). To compare continuous variables, the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Using Cox’s proportional hazards model, univariate and multivariate analyses for survival differences were performed. Survival was calculated from the diagnosis of the patient to either the date of death from any cause or the date of the last follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff value for serum Galectin-3 levels (6.94 ng/mL). The median cumulative survival probability was calculated using the product-limit method of Kaplan-Meier. Differences in survival between groups were determined using the log-rank test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics, including absolute and relative frequencies, means, standard deviations (SDs), and minimum and maximum values were used to describe the study population and questionnaire responses. Statistical comparisons were performed between subjects who had undergone screening and those who had not. We evaluated differences between subgroups using Pearson's chi-square tests. The differences between the ages of group members according to participation were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.
Potential predictor variables for participation in screening (demographic characteristics and sources of information regarding CRC screening) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, history of CRC in family, letter of invitation and sources of information. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. A P of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used for the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All outcome data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA), and statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Data was described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The repeated measures analysis of variance process of the general linear model in SPSS was used before comparing the preoperative and the postoperative data. Statistics were performed as bivariate analyses of the combined mean polar values with calculation of 2-dimensional confidence ellipses and determination of Hotelling T2, as previously detailed [10 (link)]. All P values were two-sided and were determined to be statistically significant when the values were less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis Methodology for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., USA). The results of groups with normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD, and the median was used to present results that showed abnormal distribution. Categorical variables were presented as percentages. To determine significant differences between the groups, the t-test was used for data with normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for data with non-normal distribution. To determine the relationship between the variables, for each group, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the best cut-off value. P-values < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Etanercept for Acute Ocular Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistics were calculated using SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Spearman's rank correlation was used to present the association between Sotozono's acute and chronic grading score. Correlation coefficients (ρ) were also calculated. Student's t-test was used to compare the difference in demographics, follow-up duration, acute and chronic grading scores between patients treated with or without additional etanercept, and chronic grading scores in patients receiving AMT before or beyond 7 days after onset. Chi-squared test was used to compare distribution of causative medications between patients treated with or without additional etanercept. A p < 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Celiac Disease Serological Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, and maximum were used to analyze quantitative parameters. Absolute and relative frequency were used to analyze qualitative parameters. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated from frequency of VA and positivity ofaTTG and aDGP and were reported with their 95%CI. To quantify antibody titers (aTTG IgA, aTTG IgG, aDGP IgA, aDGP IgG) receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the best cutoff values with highest total sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were calculated for these new cutoff values. The Mann–Whitney test or Fisher’s exact test were used for comparison of aTTG and aDGP positive and negative patients as well as for comparison of patients according to the persistence of VA. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used for the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Dental Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Co., Chicago, IL, USA), at a 5% significance level. Data regarding operation time was normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test, p>0.05) and homoscedastic (Levene's test, p>0.05); thus, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was employed for the comparison among groups. The post-hoc Games-Howell test was used to analyze the other variables that presented heterogeneous variance (volume and percentage of initial and residual filling, and dentin removal).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!